On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:12:39 -0400 Nathan Gibbs
wrote:
> It appears that if an OnErrorExecute Event can fire, that an OnOutdatedExecute
> Event won't fire even if it could.
>
> For instance a Clamav Installation with
> Engine0.96.2
> DB Version11991
>
> 1. I cycle the freshcl
Hello,
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:03:44 +0300
From: T?r?k Edwin
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] can?t compile 0.96.3
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Message-ID: <20100921100344.133d4...@deb0>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:26:01 +0200
Florian Schaal
Hello,
I have resolved the situation ... your note to set debugging helped to see that
the last install did work correctly.
Some observations:
I downloaded from the SourceForge site, the download that came labeled 0.96.3
is the one that gave me the bzip2 message, even though it seemed like it w
* Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 9/21/10 9:55 PM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
>>
>> Now will the REAL C CODERS PLEASE STAND UP! Do it right and show me how
>> its done. Better yet, just do it right the first time, and I won't say a
>> thing.
>
> Got your ECR submitted? Has change board seen it, approved i
On 9/22/10 6:58 AM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
Those guys could do this better than me any day of the week. They could code
circles around me, but so far they won't. what does that tell you?
They have higher priorities.
dp
___
Help us build a comprehensi
All I can ask after messing with 50+ boxes here to get 0.96.3 running is
hat ever happened to the RELEASE CANDIDATE for 0.96.3it would have
sure helped to see that announcement and get a trial run at it.
This is NOT the first time we've had bumpy releases in the last year and
we're donating
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:56:18 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
> All I can ask after messing with 50+ boxes here to get 0.96.3 running is
> hat ever happened to the RELEASE CANDIDATE for 0.96.3it would have
> sure helped to see that announcement and get a trial run at it.
>
> This is NOT the first
* Nathan Gibbs wrote:
>
> In Conclusion
> I can think of at least three more CLmaAV events that it would be nice to be
> notified on.
> However, I feel that it is important to decide how to do one common task
> before covering new ground.
>
> Final opinion about how to do the common task.
> Use e
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:56:18 -0500
George Kasica wrote:
> All I can ask after messing with 50+ boxes here to get 0.96.3 running
> is hat ever happened to the RELEASE CANDIDATE for 0.96.3it would
> have sure helped to see that announcement and get a trial run at it.
>
> This is NOT the first
Tomaz:
Typical issues as in the past...first no clue it was coming out(no release
candidate no announcement)...it just appeared, no idea it would have
issues with bzip2, and STILL no fix to bzip2 RPMs for the Fedora Core 13
platform (we had to compile from a tar.gz for the others) except RHEL4/
Edwin:
Then you need to look at the tests, something isn't making it...the stuff
build but there were errors/warnings at the end of configure about bzip2
and Don't rely on this build, etc. Also ULIMIT complaints.
If you're just looking at little green lights on a web page we have a
serious pr
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:18:09 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
> Then you need to look at the tests, something isn't making it...the stuff
> build but there were errors/warnings at the end of configure about bzip2
> and
These warnings inform you that your bzip2 library has security bugs and
can be ex
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:14:57 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
>
> Tomaz:
>
> Typical issues as in the past...first no clue it was coming out(no
> release candidate no announcement)...it just appeared, no idea it would
> have issues with bzip2,
0.96.3 is a security release, which fixes an integer over
I am running clamav on my dev laptop which is Snow Leopard, running FreeBSD.
The bzip2 warning if I don't have to worry about it -- that's fine. But if I
wanted to fix the issue, I don't think it's obvious how to go about it. I would
rather ran the software without the warning -- warnings are th
Wendy
Download the bzip2 security release and compile. I have to go back to my
office to check what compile settings are necessary as the dedault make file is
nor good enough.
Tom
On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Wendy J Bossons wrote:
> I am running clamav on my dev laptop which is Snow Leopar
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:59:48 -0400
Wendy J Bossons wrote:
> I am running clamav on my dev laptop which is Snow Leopard, running
> FreeBSD. The bzip2 warning if I don't have to worry about it --
> that's fine.
You don't have to worry about the ulimit warning.
You do have to worry about the bzip2
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:14:57 -0500
George Kasica wrote:
> Tomaz:
>
> Typical issues as in the past...first no clue it was coming out(no
> release candidate no announcement)...it just appeared, no idea it
> would have issues with bzip2
There is a problem with security updates and release candida
* Nathan Gibbs wrote:
>
> In Conclusion
> I can think of at least three more CLmaAV events that it would be nice to be
> notified on.
> However, I feel that it is important to decide how to do one common task
> before covering new ground.
>
> Final opinion about how to do the common task.
> Use e
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, TR Shaw wrote:
Wendy
Download the bzip2 security release and compile. I have to go back to
my office to check what compile settings are necessary as the dedault
make file is nor good enough.
There is, of course, more than one way to get to the same result. But
first I
Edwin:
I've been around the 'net quite some time (1983), please excuse me if I'm
expecting too much.
I think releasing the clamav item before there were bzip2 libraries out
there to compile against for major distros (Fedora Core 13, RHEL4 and
RHEL5 are not small install bases) and many if not
Hi, all--
On Sep 22, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Larry Stone wrote:
>> Download the bzip2 security release and compile. I have to go back to my
>> office to check what compile settings are necessary as the dedault make file
>> is nor good enough.
>
> There is, of course, more than one way to get to the
* Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 9/22/10 6:58 AM, Nathan Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Those guys could do this better than me any day of the week. They
>> could code
>> circles around me, but so far they won't. what does that tell you?
>
> They have higher priorities.
>
Obviously, which leaves me with the c
Nathan Gibbs wrote:
> Here is my working "test" implementation for the milter
>
> http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/clamfi.c
Hi Nathan,
awsome spirit!
I'd love to say "awesome code" too but I haven't had a chance to look at
it yet.
I'll certainly do that before monday.
Cheers,
--aCaB
Just my 2 cents but since this is Open Source software, what you did is
the correct thing. You wanted a feature added, the ability to have commandline
arguments on virusaction script. Since this is a feature request, it almost
always gets low priority if it gets scheduled for implementation
>
> So, what did I lose?
> 1. %v functionality
> Which I'll fire up my chainsaw and fix if the real surgeons don't show up.
>
> In summary, I'm not the person to be doing this job, but somebody needs to.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Nathan Gibbs
>
> Systems Administrator
> Christ Media
> http://ww
George Kasica wrote:
> In any case its a past event and something to keep in mind next time
> probably.
Hi George,
thanks for sharing your thoughts and sorry for any trouble we might have
caused.
There are just a copuple of things I'd like to add.
The bzip bug was circulating among all the invo
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:08:32 -0500 George Kasica
wrote:
> Edwin:
>
> I've been around the 'net quite some time (1983), please excuse me if I'm
> expecting too much.
>
> I think releasing the clamav item before there were bzip2 libraries out
> there to compile against for major distros (Fedora
I am running clamav 0.96.3. I checked and I do not have any old
executables around. I ran all relevant binaries with -V option and they
all report correct version.
Yet this is what I have in my log:
freshclam: ClamAV update process started at Wed Sep 22 14:26:03 2010
freshclam: Your ClamAV inst
On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Frank Bures wrote:
> Yet this is what I have in my log:
>
> freshclam: ClamAV update process started at Wed Sep 22 14:26:03 2010
> freshclam: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
> freshclam: Local version: 0.96.2 Recommended version: 0.96.3
>
> What gives?
Perhap
* Jim Preston wrote:
> Just my 2 cents but since this is Open Source software, what you did
> is the correct thing. You wanted a feature added, the ability to have
> commandline arguments on virusaction script.
Actually aCaB adjusted my opinion on that. I came around to seeing it his
way, b
* aCaB wrote:
> Nathan Gibbs wrote:
>> Here is my working "test" implementation for the milter
>>
>> http://www.cmpublishers.com/oss/clamfi.c
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> awsome spirit!
> I'd love to say "awesome code" too but I haven't had a chance to look at
> it yet.
You probably won't say that even af
Wendy,
Download the source from bzip, open the make file and insert
CFLAGS=-Os -arch i386 -arch x86_64 $(BIGFILES)
or
CFLAGS=-Os -arch ppc $(BIGFILES)
depending on which processor you need and then
sudo make install
Tom
On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Wendy J Bossons wrote:
> I am running clam
32 matches
Mail list logo