On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:34:15 -0400
Jason Parsons wrote:
> [r...@c1-delltest2 temp]# egrep ':54$' daily.*
> daily.ftm:1:*:255044462d??2e*737461727478726566*2525454f46:PDF:CL_TYPE_ANY:CL_TYPE_PDF:54:54
> daily.ftm:1:*:257064662d??2e*737461727478726566*2525454f46:PDF:CL_TYPE_ANY:CL_TYPE_PDF:54:54
> d
Dear List,
I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail has got
identified as virus: Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain, with internal
reference code as ' 02103-11/QCZxxtAvePMy'. I don't know what exactly is the
meaning of internal reference code.
We are not quaranti
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:35:40 +0530
ANANT S ATHAVALE wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail has
> got identified as virus: Heuristics.Phishing.Email.SpoofedDomain,
> with internal reference code as ' 02103-11/QCZxxtAvePMy'.
That reference code
Hi there,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 ANANT S ATHAVALE wrote:
> I have got a complaint from one of our users that, a genuine mail
> has got identified as virus:
> ...
> But, it looks like this is a false positive as the recipient has
> confirmed with the bank that such mails are being sent.
I personally
- Message from edwinto...@gmail.com -
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:46:40 +0300
From: Török Edwin
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Fwd: Important mail marked as spam
To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: a...@isac.gov.in, RAKESH KUMAR , RAJIV
RATAN CHETWANI
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
>
> I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in the greeting,
> the envelope addres
Chris wrote:
> So, I wrote a nice little script, and it would work fine too, except
> that the 4th argument (the "destination", which I took to mean the
> "recipient") is always "UNKNOWN". So, the message always fails. Maybe
> destination isn't supposed to mean recipient -- if that is so, what do
Dear List,
>That reference code is not coming from ClamAV, it has no reference
>codes. Its probably some reference code of some 3rdparty app that uses
>ClamAV for scanning.
This is an amavisd-new reference code.
I've seen false positives with genuine messages from other banks. I would be
good t
I think you're doing it right.
You only need to configure sendmail to fill in those macroes, which, by
default, it leaves blank.
It's generally only a matter of adding the following line to your .cf:
define(`confMILTER_MACROS_EOM', `{msg_id}, {mail_addr}, {rcpt_addr}, i')
HtH,
aCaB
Thanks for
Chris wrote:
> I am not sure I follow your logic here though, because I thought it was
> clamav-milter that passes those 7 arguments (not sendmail), all of which
> look good, except the 4th: "destination".
That's correct. But clamav-milter is just a stupid streaming bridge
which knows nothing abou
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
I reject mail which uses the word 'bank' anywhere in t
On 9/9/2010 10:13 AM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
>> G.W. Haywood articulated:
>>
>>> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
>>> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, and about banks.
>>>
On 17 Jun 2010, at 5:24 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Here is a new patch for Mac OS X/PPC:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1333
It reverts my previous patch, and applies my patch from LLVM PR5201
(which isn't finished, but appears to work
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:01:28 +0100
Mark Allan wrote:
>
> On 17 Jun 2010, at 5:24 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
> >
> >> Here is a new patch for Mac OS X/PPC:
> >> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1333
> >>
> >> It reverts my previous patch
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:13:03 -0700
JD articulated:
> On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
> > G.W. Haywood articulated:
> >
> >> I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
> >> to be from a bank. I know too much about email, a
On 9 Sep 2010, at 8:11 pm, Török Edwin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:01:28 +0100, Mark Allan wrote:
On 17 Jun 2010, at 5:24 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Here is a new patch for Mac OS X/PPC:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1333
It reverts m
On 9 Sep 2010, at 9:53 pm, Mark Allan wrote:
On 9 Sep 2010, at 8:11 pm, Török Edwin wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:01:28 +0100, Mark Allan wrote:
On 17 Jun 2010, at 5:24 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török Edwin wrote:
Here is a new patch for Mac OS X/PPC:
https://wwws.clamav.net
On 09/09/2010 01:32 PM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:13:03 -0700
JD articulated:
On 09/09/2010 05:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:10:37 +0100 (BST)
G.W. Haywood articulated:
I personally would never accept nor rely on any email which claimed
to be from a bank. I know t
* Chris wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have recently upgraded to clamav 0.96, and I noticed that there have
> been some major changes to clamav-milter.
>
> I am trying to get recipient notification to work with clamav-milter,
> but I fail to see how this is done. I have looked at the man page, and
> the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 22:17:07 +0100
Mark Allan wrote:
>
> On 9 Sep 2010, at 9:53 pm, Mark Allan wrote:
> > On 9 Sep 2010, at 8:11 pm, Török Edwin wrote:
> >> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:01:28 +0100, Mark Allan wrote:
> >>> On 17 Jun 2010, at 5:24 pm, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Török
20 matches
Mail list logo
