Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Török Edwin wrote: >> Please run 'make VERBOSE=1', and paste the output. > > llvm[3]: Compiling version.c for Release build Thanks, please 'git pull' and try building again. Best regards, --Edwin

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Shaw
At 10:45 AM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Török Edwin wrote: Please run 'make VERBOSE=1', and paste the output. llvm[3]: Compiling version.c for Release build Thanks, please 'git pull' and try building again. Edwin,

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/02/2010 04:44 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 10:45 AM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: >> On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: >>> At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Török Edwin wrote: Please run 'make VERBOSE=1', and paste the output. >>> >>> llvm[3]: Compiling version.c for Release build >> >>

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Shaw
At 4:46 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 04:44 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 10:45 AM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Török Edwin wrote: Please run 'make VERBOSE=1', and paste the output. llvm[3]: Compiling

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/02/2010 05:33 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 4:46 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: >> On 05/02/2010 04:44 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: >>> At 10:45 AM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Török Edwin wrote: >> Please run '

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Shaw
At 6:07 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 05:33 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 4:46 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 04:44 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 10:45 AM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: On 05/02/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: At 10:52 PM +0300 5/1/10, Törö

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Shaw
At 6:07 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: We're getting closer. T Thanks, Edwin. That worked. Installed and tried to get version but got: $ /usr/local/clamav/bin/clambc-compiler -v clang -cc1 version 1.1 based upon llvm 2.7 hosted on i386-apple-darwin9 re2c: error: cannot re-open error: re2

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/02/2010 06:21 PM, Tom Shaw wrote: > At 6:07 PM +0300 5/2/10, Török Edwin wrote: >> We're getting closer. >> T > > Thanks, Edwin. That worked. Installed and tried to get version but got: > > $ /usr/local/clamav/bin/clambc-compiler -v Please use --version. > clang -cc1 version 1.1 based upo

Re: [Clamav-users] Resources for integrating with spamassassin+amavisd

2010-05-02 Thread Alex
Hi, >> Why are some of the databases duplicated in the clamav root dir and >> also in the unofficial-dbs/ss-dbs directory, such as >> winnow_malware.hdb? > > The rsync protocol only downloads the changes between the local and remote > files, so the local file much be available comparison.  The > u

Re: [Clamav-users] Resources for integrating with spamassassin+amavisd

2010-05-02 Thread Bill Landry
On 5/2/2010 9:59 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, Why are some of the databases duplicated in the clamav root dir and also in the unofficial-dbs/ss-dbs directory, such as winnow_malware.hdb? The rsync protocol only downloads the changes between the local and remote files, so the local file much be availab

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 5/2/10 8:14 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: Trying now let you know in about 10 10.5.8 right now. 10.6 after we get this working Tom I was able to compile .96 in Snow Leopard with no modification. dp ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit h

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/02/2010 10:27 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 5/2/10 8:14 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: > >> >> Trying now let you know in about 10 >> >> 10.5.8 right now. 10.6 after we get this working >> >> Tom > > I was able to compile .96 in Snow Leopard with no modification. He was having trouble compiling the

Re: [Clamav-users] Resources for integrating with spamassassin+amavisd

2010-05-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 5/2/10 9:59 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, Why are some of the databases duplicated in the clamav root dir and also in the unofficial-dbs/ss-dbs directory, such as winnow_malware.hdb? The rsync protocol only downloads the changes between the local and remote files, so the local file much be available

Re: [Clamav-users] byte code compiler configure issues

2010-05-02 Thread Tom Shaw
At 12:27 PM -0700 5/2/10, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 5/2/10 8:14 AM, Tom Shaw wrote: Trying now let you know in about 10 10.5.8 right now. 10.6 after we get this working Tom I was able to compile .96 in Snow Leopard with no modification. Thanks Dennis. I had no problems for ClamAV (did h

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrading System for latest ClamAV version

2010-05-02 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 06:36:51AM -0400, Jerry (clamav.u...@seibercom.net) wrote: > Or, to put it in simpler terms, "It's better to light a candle than > curse the darkness." THAT is not a "simple term" ;-) "It's better to light a (someones) candle than (to let them) curse the darkness."

[Clamav-users] freshclam, updates and EOL.

2010-05-02 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Hi. I have been following the thread about "EOL" and "Move to next version of clamav" which stopped a few mailservers ... I do not want to take sides here, this is NOT what this email is about. This is a suggestion. Simply to make sure that everyone gets the message NEXT time wouldn't it be p

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrading System for latest ClamAV version

2010-05-02 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:52:40AM -0400, Jerry (clamav.u...@seibercom.net) wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:05:40 +0100, Simon Hobson > articulated: [snip] > > Still, it would be better still if someone didn't break in and snuff > > our candles out to force us to switch to electricity ! > >

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

2010-05-02 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
Until a few months ago I had 2(!!!) Redhat 7 servers in full flight running compiled versions of sendmail and clamav (amongst other things). I never had any problems to get the latest versions compiled Jobst On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:22:53PM +0300, Török Edwin (edwinto...@gmail.com) wrot