Re: [Clamav-users] Building clamav-0.96 and requirements

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 12:32 AM, Alex wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build 0.96 on Linux with an older compiler what version? and glibc, and wondered what the minimum system requirements were? Is this documented somewhere? Yes, in docs/clamdoc.pdf It appears g++ may be too old, as it builds libclamav/

[Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hello list, Is FreeBSD (8.0-STABLE) to blame for this one? 6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o check_clamav-check_bytecode.o `test -f 'check_bytecode.c' || echo './'`check_bytecode.c CCLD check_clamav CC check_clamd-check_clamd.o cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -DSRCDIR=\"/usr/ports/securi

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 12:39 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Hello list, Is FreeBSD (8.0-STABLE) to blame for this one? 6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o check_clamav-check_bytecode.o `test -f 'check_bytecode.c' || echo './'`check_bytecode.c CCLD check_clamav CC check_clamd-check_clamd.o cc -DHAV

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
2010/4/12 Török Edwin > On 04/12/2010 12:39 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> Is FreeBSD (8.0-STABLE) to blame for this one? >> >> >> 6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o check_clamav-check_bytecode.o `test -f >> 'check_bytecode.c' || echo './'`check_bytecode.c >> CCLD check_clam

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 01:43 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: 2010/4/12 Török Edwin On 04/12/2010 12:39 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Hello list, Is FreeBSD (8.0-STABLE) to blame for this one? 6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o check_clamav-check_bytecode.o `test -f 'check_bytecode.c' || echo './'`check_b

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
2010/4/12 Török Edwin > On 04/12/2010 01:43 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> 2010/4/12 Török Edwin >> >> On 04/12/2010 12:39 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>> >>> Hello list, Is FreeBSD (8.0-STABLE) to blame for this one? 6 -fno-strict-aliasing -c -o check_clamav-c

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 03:49 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Okay, here are the details from unit_tests/test-suite.log: ClamAV 0.96: unit_tests/test-suite.log 1 of 7 tests failed. (5 tests were not run). .. c

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
2010/4/12 Török Edwin > On 04/12/2010 03:49 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> Okay, here are the details from unit_tests/test-suite.log: >> >> >> >>ClamAV 0.96: unit_tests/test-suite.log >> >> >> 1 of

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 03:57 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: 2010/4/12 Török Edwin On 04/12/2010 03:49 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Okay, here are the details from unit_tests/test-suite.log: ClamAV 0.96: unit_tests/test-suite.log

Re: [Clamav-users] FreeBSD install of 0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Odhiambo Washington
2010/4/12 Török Edwin > On 04/12/2010 03:57 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> 2010/4/12 Török Edwin >> >> On 04/12/2010 03:49 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >>> >>> Okay, here are the details from unit_tests/test-suite.log: C

[Clamav-users] SafeBrowsing signature removal.

2010-04-12 Thread Adam Stephens
Anyone know the policy on removing signatures from safebrowsing.cld? I've just been contacted by someone who was having trouble mailing us because their domain triggers the signatures - but they claim they were only listed by google for a few hours on March 20th, which seems to be true. Adam

Re: [Clamav-users] SafeBrowsing signature removal.

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 05:04 PM, Adam Stephens wrote: Anyone know the policy on removing signatures from safebrowsing.cld? Should get removed automatically. I've just been contacted by someone who was having trouble mailing us because their domain triggers the signatures - but they claim they were on

Re: [Clamav-users] SafeBrowsing signature removal.

2010-04-12 Thread Adam Stephens
Török Edwin wrote: On 04/12/2010 05:04 PM, Adam Stephens wrote: I've just been contacted by someone who was having trouble mailing us because their domain triggers the signatures - but they claim they were only listed by google for a few hours on March 20th, which seems to be true. Which ha

Re: [Clamav-users] SafeBrowsing signature removal.

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/12/2010 05:58 PM, Adam Stephens wrote: Török Edwin wrote: On 04/12/2010 05:04 PM, Adam Stephens wrote: I've just been contacted by someone who was having trouble mailing us because their domain triggers the signatures - but they claim they were only listed by google for a few hours on M

[Clamav-users] HostID

2010-04-12 Thread Chris
I'd like to set this up for my home system, what format does a HostID need to be in? -- KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clam

Re: [Clamav-users] HostID

2010-04-12 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/13/2010 01:57 AM, Chris wrote: I'd like to set this up for my home system, what format does a HostID need to be in? You get the HostID by following the steps described here: http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20100322.160036.f73182fc.en.html Best regards, --Edwin __