Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
>>> removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) >> Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for >> them (without any actual announcement from them)? > Do you have any indication that MSRBL is still alive and that the > signature databases are being actively updated?

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
On 1/24/2010 12:43 AM, John Rudd wrote: removes MSRBL (as it's no longer being updated) Did they declare themselves to be defunct, or are you declaring it for them (without any actual announcement from them)? Do you have any indication that MSRBL is still alive and tha

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
> Then you don't have a clue and are obviously not qualified to make a > judgment call on this matter. They used to routinely have some signatures that would go weeks, even months, without updates. I used tolook at their signatures and see that they were a month or two old ... and a few months

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
John Rudd wrote: >> Then you don't have a clue and are obviously not qualified to make a >> judgment call on this matter. > > They used to routinely have some signatures that would go weeks, even > months, without updates. I used tolook at their signatures and see > that they were a month or two

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
>> Most recent update from them was 3 months ago. > > rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb > -rw-r--r-- 244643 2009/07/27 01:21:23 MSRBL-SPAM.ndb > > rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb > -rw-r--r-- 181337 2009/07/24 03:40:17 MSRBL-Images.hdb rsync rsyn

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread Bill Landry
John Rudd wrote: >>> Most recent update from them was 3 months ago. >> rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb >> -rw-r--r-- 244643 2009/07/27 01:21:23 MSRBL-SPAM.ndb >> >> rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb >> -rw-r--r-- 181337 2009/07/24 03:40:17 MSRBL-I

Re: [Clamav-users] Script updated: clamav-unofficial-sigs.sh (v3.7)

2010-01-24 Thread John Rudd
>> rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images-FULL-SoN.hdb >> -rw-r--r--    19030813 2009/10/07 15:50:05 MSRBL-Images-FULL-SoN.hdb > > Only the clueless would use that database. Which is irrelevant to the point. The point isn't "is it a reasonable/accurate/etc. database", the point i