[Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best side... Just my2 cents Tom ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://w

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

> Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with > the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best > side... Hi Tom, They use windows based version of software, as far as I can remember. Having said that... 0.94.2 is available for windows: http://hide

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

Steve Basford escribió: >> Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with >> the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best >> side... > > Hi Tom, > > They use windows based version of software, as far as I can remember. > > Having said that... 0.94.2

[Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File, but I would like to see a SafeBrowsin

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File, > but I would like to see a S

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 15:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamA

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. >>> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and s

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Török Edwin wrote: > > Try using for the URL. > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some of them may not know this :). dp ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.

[Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2

So I attempted an upgrade to .95rc2 last night and clamd started fine but the milter complained about --quiet and --max-children. Since I use about 6 flags, I decided to back rev and see if anyone else experienced the same. Ed ...

Re: [Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2

On 2009-03-17 17:10, Ed Kasky wrote: > So I attempted an upgrade to .95rc2 last night and clamd started fine > but the milter complained about --quiet and --max-children. > > Since I use about 6 flags, I decided to back rev and see if anyone > else experienced the same. > > Please read the up

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 17:07, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > > >> Try using for the URL. >> >> > > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some > of > them may not know this :). No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "http:

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 16:59 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > > >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeB

[Clamav-users] ATTN clamav.net webmaster: outdated ClamWin download link

Greetings ClamAV.net webmaster! The link on page http://www.clamav.net/download/packages/packages-win32 points to the outdated http://win32.clamav.net, which says that it is "no longer supported". Had me scared for a second there, then I remembered that the live site for ClamWin i

[Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

I've compiled the 0.95rc2 here on Solaris and when installed and I run the clamd I get the following error but its still running. # /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamd LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable I thought all I had to do was to have it commented out in

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

On 2009-03-17 18:43, George R. Kasica wrote: > I've compiled the 0.95rc2 here on Solaris and when installed and I run > the clamd I get the following error but its still running. > > > # /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamd > LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support > unavailable >

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. All seems well at this point, and you were correct, I wasn't looking to disable the feature. Why does this not occur in Red Hap ES4 but on Solaris? Also, I haven't needed to modify the env variables on any p

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

On 2009-03-17 20:02, George R. Kasica wrote: > I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. > > All seems well at this point, and you were correct, I wasn't looking > to disable the feature. > > Why does this not occur in Red Hap ES4 but on Solaris?

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

On 17 Mar 2009 at 13:28, Julio Canto wrote: > Steve Basford escribió: > >> Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with > >> the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best > >> side... > > > > Having said that... 0.94.2 is available for windows: >

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

>On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:07:19 +0200, you wrote: >On 2009-03-17 20:02, George R. Kasica wrote: >> I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. >> >> All seems well at this point, and you were correct, I wasn't looking >> to disable the feature. >> >>

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

On 2009-03-17 20:19, George R. Kasica wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:07:19 +0200, you wrote: >> > > >> On 2009-03-17 20:02, George R. Kasica wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the >>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. >>> >>> All seems well at this poin

[Clamav-users] Virus definitions cannot be updated (Mac OS X)

I use ClamXav 1.1.1 on a Mac G4 (PPC), OS X 10.4.11. In recent weeks I have more and more frequently received an error message when trying to update the virus definitions, and in the last week or so it has become impossible to update them. It is clear from the ClamXav discussion forums that man

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

Bug #1476 created with the requested info. >On 2009-03-17 20:19, George R. Kasica wrote: >>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:07:19 +0200, you wrote: >>> >> >> >>> On 2009-03-17 20:02, George R. Kasica wrote: >>> I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the LD_LIBR

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:59:42 - "Paul Whelan" wrote: > If anyone on the clamav team is going to respond to this thread, perhaps > now would be a good time to give an update on the progress of the promised > windows binary support. Hi Paul, out of the box windows support is planned for ClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems builing in solaris related to unrar libraries

George R. Kasica wrote: > I'm not sure how to use crle to do this, so I just added to the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting. > > All seems well at this point, and you were correct, I wasn't looking > to disable the feature. > > Why does this not occur in Red Hap ES4 but on Solaris? Also, I haven't > nee

Re: [Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2

>Author: Török Edwin >Date: 2009-03-17 08:122009-03-17 15:12 -700UTC >To: ClamAV users ML >Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Failed milter upgrade to .95rc2 >On 2009-03-17 17:10, Ed Kasky wrote: > > So I attempted an upgrade to .95rc2 la

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV and VirusTotal

Paul Whelan escribió: > On 17 Mar 2009 at 13:28, Julio Canto wrote: > >> Steve Basford escribió: Any particular reason why they are using 0.94.1 (and it appears with the most non aggressive settings)? You are not showing off your best side... >>> Having said that... 0.94.2 is avail