Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I upgraded ClamAV from 0.91.2 to 0.93.1 and found out that the
> > PhishingRestrictedScan option is gone.
> >
> > I have always used PhishingRestrictedScan=no, how can I have the same
> > behaviour in 0.93.1? I don't mind some FPs because of this setting.
>
> I
On 2008-07-08 10:29, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>>> I upgraded ClamAV from 0.91.2 to 0.93.1 and found out that the
>>> PhishingRestrictedScan option is gone.
>>>
>>> I have always used PhishingRestrictedScan=no, how can I have the same
>>> behaviour in 0.93.1? I don
T?r?k Edwin wrote:
> >
> >>> I upgraded ClamAV from 0.91.2 to 0.93.1 and found out that the
> >>> PhishingRestrictedScan option is gone.
> >>>
> >>> I have always used PhishingRestrictedScan=no, how can I have the same
> >>> behaviour in 0.93.1? I don't mind some FPs because of this setting.
>
On 2008-07-08 12:08, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> T?r?k Edwin wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
> I upgraded ClamAV from 0.91.2 to 0.93.1 and found out that the
> PhishingRestrictedScan option is gone.
>
> I have always used PhishingRestrictedScan=no, how can I have the same
> behaviour
T?r?k Edwin wrote:
> >>>
> > I upgraded ClamAV from 0.91.2 to 0.93.1 and found out that the
> > PhishingRestrictedScan option is gone.
> >
> > I have always used PhishingRestrictedScan=no, how can I have the same
> > behaviour in 0.93.1? I don't mind some FPs because of
Brian Morrison wrote:
Folks,
A problem has been found in 0.93.2 and it has to be withdrawn. Please do
not use it. We are working on a fix as a top priority.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
So what was the problem Nigel, 0.93.3 is working here now,
The problem related to a 3rd party library
Nigel Horne wrote:
>> So what was the problem Nigel, 0.93.3 is working here now,
>
> The problem related to a 3rd party library used to load some of the
> signatures used by ClamAV in its database.
OK, at least it was a short lived problem.
>
> I am pleased that 0.93.3 is working for you.
So
Hi!
After first # freshclam
the# /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g
work without any problem.
# ll
total 15788
-rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 930977 Jul 8 10:17 daily.cvd
-rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 15200793 Jul 8 10:17 main.cvd
-rw--- 1 clamav clamav 52 Jul 8 10:17 mirrors.da
Sim wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After first # freshclam
> the# /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g
> work without any problem.
>
> # ll
> total 15788
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 930977 Jul 8 10:17 daily.cvd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 15200793 Jul 8 10:17 main.cvd
> -rw--- 1 clamav clamav
Sim wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After first # freshclam
> the# /var/qmail/bin/simscanmk -g
> work without any problem.
>
> # ll
> total 15788
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 930977 Jul 8 10:17 daily.cvd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 15200793 Jul 8 10:17 main.cvd
> -rw--- 1 clamav clamav
I've been reviewing our clamav configuration and noticed that we have:
PhishingScanURLs no
while the default in 0.93.1 is yes
What exactly does this test do? How many of you have it turned on and off?
--
Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Help u
I believe it follows links in HTML to see if they are phishing scams or not.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Roberto Ullfig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been reviewing our clamav configuration and noticed that we have:
>
> PhishingScanURLs no
>
> while the default in 0.93.1 is yes
>
> What
Roberto Ullfig wrote:
> PhishingScanURLs no
> while the default in 0.93.1 is yes
> What exactly does this test do?
It uses heuristics to attempt to detect Phishing scams. I don't believe
it actually follows the links as was suggested by another poster.
We keep PhishingScanURLs turned off for a
Noel Jones wrote:
>> Where is "daily.cvd" ?
>
>
> When incremental updates (the *.cdiff files) are applied, the
> *.cvd file is replaced with a *.cld file. This replaces some
> previous methods used for managing updates.
I'm finding I end up with both a main.cld and a main.cvd file, and clam
Hello,
I get this in my daily scan reports:
"LibClamAV Warning: Bad compression in flate stream"
Could you please advise what is causing this?
ClamAV 0.92.1
Debian Lenny 2.6.21-2-686
--
Regards,
Veselin Kantsev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Campbell-Lange Workshop
__
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
>>> Where is "daily.cvd" ?
>>
>> When incremental updates (the *.cdiff files) are applied, the
>> *.cvd file is replaced with a *.cld file. This replaces some
>> previous methods used for managing updates.
>
> I'm finding I end up with both a main.c
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:01:57 +0100
Veselin Kantsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I get this in my daily scan reports:
> "LibClamAV Warning: Bad compression in flate stream"
>
> Could you please advise what is causing this?
>
>
> ClamAV 0.92.1
That's from the pdf handler, upgrade to 0.9
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:08:26 -0500
Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have both a .cld and .cvd, just remove whichever is
> older (likely the .cvd). Or remove them both and run freshclam.
>
> This probably happened during a version upgrade. (Seems like
> the install script should t
Thank you much Tomasz.
Veselin
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 18:01:57 +0100
> Veselin Kantsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I get this in my daily scan reports:
> > "LibClamAV Warning: Bad compression in flate stream"
> >
> > Cou
19 matches
Mail list logo
