On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:30:11 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lanfranco Fabriani) wrote:
> Is this necessary? In the years I never run freshclam before
> restarting clamd and the software always ran very well. The server
> of mine is a little mail server, so usually I try to switch off mimedefang
>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:30:11 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lanfranco Fabriani) wrote:
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> >
> > Lanfranco Fabriani wrote:
> > ...
> > > clamd stop
> > > make uninstall 0.92.1
> > > make install 0.93
> > > ldconfig
> > > clamd restart
> >
> > I would run freshclam before sta
Hello *,
my "freshclam.conf" contains
OnUpdateExecute /usr/ClamAV/bin/freshclam.mail
and the refenced "/usr/ClamAV/bin/freshclam.mail" reads
| #!/bin/sh
|
| cd /usr/ClamAV/data
| DIFF="/tmp/clamav-signatures.$$" ; /bin/rm -f $DIFF
|
| MAIL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
|
| /bin/mv signatures sign
Frank Elsner wrote:
> Why this? Is sigtool broken? Is my procedure broken in respect to version
> 0.93?
> From the log freshclam obviously does the job, but ...
>
Please try the patch from here:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=938
Best regards,
--Edwin
___
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-NetKnow-InComing-4694-2-MailScanner-Watermark:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] by digitalanswers.org
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:48:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: Cron Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:30:11 +0200 (CEST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lanfranco Fabriani) wrote:
>
>> Is this necessary? In the years I never run freshclam before
>> restarting clamd and the software always ran very well. The server
>> of mine is a little mail server, so usually I tr
George R. Kasica wrote:
>> George R. Kasica wrote:
>>
We have the same issue. I'd take a guess that it's because we're running
zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2 which is the latest offered by RHEL 4.
>>> Ditto error here with zlib 1.2.3 and I've made sure there are no
>>> dup
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:08:41 +0300 Török Edwin wrote:
> Frank Elsner wrote:
> > Why this? Is sigtool broken? Is my procedure broken in respect to version
> > 0.93?
> > From the log freshclam obviously does the job, but ...
> >
>
> Please try the patch from here:
> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Peterson wrote:
| So I currently have a main.cvd and a daily.cld, both files. Is this what
| 0.93 uses or will main.cvd be swapped out with a cld container at some
| point?
|
| dp
Yes, when there is finally an update to main.cvd...
I believe th
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> So I currently have a main.cvd and a daily.cld, both files. Is this what
> 0.93 uses or will main.cvd be swapped out with a cld container at some
> point?
And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
performance or whatever? I had assumed that t
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:49:59 +0100
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
> performance or whatever? I had assumed that the change to using .inc
> directories allowed various different signatures to be held in separate
>
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> So I currently have a main.cvd and a daily.cld, both files. Is this what
>> 0.93 uses or will main.cvd be swapped out with a cld container at some
>> point?
>
> And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
> performanc
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:49:59 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And might someone explain what this change is about, how it improves
>> performance or whatever? I had assumed that the change to using .inc
>> directories allowed various different signature
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:38:05 +0100
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the unsigned .cld file mean that an attack vector could be to edit
> the .cld file and thus corrupt it? I can see that the cdiff signing
> protects the path between the database servers and freshclam, but that
>
I need to temporarily quarantine all messages from a particular IP address.
I have written a custom virus signature before but it will not trap what I need.
I am getting messages looping that have no From address (they show up in
maillog as:
<"">... User address required
I am working with the de
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:38:05 +0100
> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does the unsigned .cld file mean that an attack vector could be to edit
>> the .cld file and thus corrupt it? I can see that the cdiff signing
>> protects the path between the database server
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:38:05 +0100
>> Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does the unsigned .cld file mean that an attack vector could be to edit
>>> the .cld file and thus corrupt it? I can see that the cdiff signing
>>> protects the pat
I need to temporarily quarantine all messages from a particular IP address.
I have written a custom virus signature before but it will not trap what I need.
I am getting messages looping that have no From address (they show up in
maillog as:
<"">... User address required
I am working with the de
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Yes, I realise that. I run clamd under user clamav, hence it's probably
>> easier to access /var/lib/clamav/* than it would be if owned by root.
>
> Why would that be? It is no more work to crack the root account than any
> other account. Nor any less. Hopefully too yo
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:28:58 +0100
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I realise that. I run clamd under user clamav, hence it's probably
> easier to access /var/lib/clamav/* than it would be if owned by root.
Only freshclam needs a write access to the database directory so you can
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>>> Yes, I realise that. I run clamd under user clamav, hence it's probably
>>> easier to access /var/lib/clamav/* than it would be if owned by root.
>> Why would that be? It is no more work to crack the root account than any
>> other account. Nor
So it appears my installed version is too old to update the database and
I need to upgrade from 0.90.3 to the latest version. I don't know who or
how this version of clamav was installed on this rhel4.6 es server but I
downloaded the tarball since clamav is not a supported rpm available
from Re
People who may have problems compiling ClamAV 0.93 with the FreeBSD
ports on 4.11 may need to patch the port Makefile as I had to. I am
not sure if it affects other FreeBSD versions or not, I didn't try it.
--- Makefile.orig Wed Apr 16 10:59:51 2008
+++ MakefileWed Apr 16 11:37:41 2008
Carlos Williams wrote:
> So it appears my installed version is too old to update the database and
> I need to upgrade from 0.90.3 to the latest version. I don't know who or
> how this version of clamav was installed on this rhel4.6 es server but I
> downloaded the tarball since clamav is not a s
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
> rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
> see if the current version is availble?
>
I had no idea YUM was even installed on this server. I thought YUM was
only availabl
Carlos Williams wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
>> rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
>> see if the current version is availble?
>>
> I had no idea YUM was even installed on this server. I
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
> rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
> see if the current version is availble?
I am getting the following error when running "yum update"
--> Processing Dependency: lib
Carlos Williams wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> It looks like earlier versions were installed as RPM packages from
>> rpmforge using yum, not the RH repository. Have you tried using yum to
>> see if the current version is availble?
> I am getting the following error when running "yum update"
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
> archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
>
> libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
>
I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
resolving this dep. issue.
When I go t
Lyle Giese wrote:
> Looks like we are having an intermitant problem with 0.93
>
> I built it from source on a SuSE 10.2(64bit), 2.6.18.2-34-default #1 SMP
> kernel on an AMD Athlon 64 processor. I compiled with no configure options.
>
> About 3 or 4 times since I updated on the 14th, I am getting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| People who may have problems compiling ClamAV 0.93 with the FreeBSD
| ports on 4.11 may need to patch the port Makefile as I had to. I am
| not sure if it affects other FreeBSD versions or not, I didn't try it.
|
| --- Make
Quoting John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
>> So why am I dissecting that list like this? Just to show that blocking
>> or not blocking certain unusal characters in mail addresses is indeed a
>> policy decision which should not be forced by a piece of software, but at
>> most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carlos Williams wrote:
| I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
| resolving this dep. issue.
|
| When I go to search the archives manually, I went to
| http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html and I get a blank page
|
Looks like we are having an intermitant problem with 0.93
I built it from source on a SuSE 10.2(64bit), 2.6.18.2-34-default #1 SMP
kernel on an AMD Athlon 64 processor. I compiled with no configure options.
About 3 or 4 times since I updated on the 14th, I am getting where
clamdmon.sh is findi
James Kosin wrote:
> ~ SPARC Options
> ~-
> ~ -pthreads
> ~ Add support for multithreading using the POSIX threads library.
> ~ This option sets flags for both the preprocessor and
> linker. This
> ~ option does not affect the thre
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:21:17 -0400, Carlos Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
>> archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
>>
>> libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
>>
>
>I searched Googl
James Kosin wrote:
>
> The -pthread should only be needed on IBM RS/6000 and PowerPC platforms.
> SPARC has their own option and everyone else should follow into the -l
> category.
>
I suppose I should clarify the architecture. This was done on an x86.
Steven
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> James Kosin wrote:
>
>
>> The -pthread should only be needed on IBM RS/6000 and PowerPC platforms.
>> SPARC has their own option and everyone else should follow into the -l
>> category.
>>
>>
>
> I suppose I should clarify the architecture. This was done on an x
On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> Manpages indicate to use -pthread to link.
> Linux: man pthreads
> Compiling on Linux
> On Linux, programs that use the Pthreads API should be compiled
> using cc -pthread
>
> FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pthread&apropo
>
>
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> > This was discussed on the list the last couple of day - check the
> > archives to see what is suggested. Google this:
> >
> > libclamunrar_iface.so.3 site:clamav.net
> >
>
> I searched Google and could not find anything that was obvious to
> resolving this
Brian Morrison wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>>> Yes, I realise that. I run clamd under user clamav, hence it's probably
>>> easier to access /var/lib/clamav/* than it would be if owned by root.
>>>
>> Why would that be? It is no more work to crack the root account than any
>> other
I've been trying to compile clamav (0.93) on AIX 5.2, and I keep getting the
checking for libgmp... no
configure: WARNING: ** GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital
signature support will be disabled !
conflig.log shows the following:
configure:15256: checking for libgmp
configure:15286: cc -
Naomi Hospodarsky wrote:
> So I'm not sure where the disconnect is happening between the two
> programs; if anyone has any ideas, I'd be very glad to hear them!
I am not up to speed on AIX so I may have some wrong presumptions
but shouldn't your header files by in /usr/local/include and your
libra
In the output of the config.log I posted, you'll see that clamav is
looking for the libs in /usr/local/include (where GMP installed its
files), but for some reason doesn't see them. So it's not that clamav
is looking in the wrong location, exactly, but that it is, for some
reason, not seeing what's
Naomi Hospodarsky wrote:
> In the output of the config.log I posted, you'll see that clamav is
> looking for the libs in /usr/local/include (where GMP installed its
> files), but for some reason doesn't see them. So it's not that clamav
> is looking in the wrong location, exactly, but that it is, f
Okay, that makes sense. I tried copying the lib files over to
/usr/local/lib as you suggested, and am now getting this error in
config.log
configure:15256: checking for libgmp
configure:15286: cc -qlanglvl=extc89 -o conftest -g
-I/usr/local/include conftest.c /usr/local/lib/libgmp.a >&5
ld: 0711
Naomi Hospodarsky wrote:
> Okay, that makes sense. I tried copying the lib files over to
> /usr/local/lib as you suggested, and am now getting this error in
> config.log
>
> configure:15256: checking for libgmp
> configure:15286: cc -qlanglvl=extc89 -o conftest -g
> -I/usr/local/include conftest.c
Naomi Hospodarsky wrote:
> Okay, that makes sense. I tried copying the lib files over to
> /usr/local/lib as you suggested, and am now getting this error in
> config.log
>
> configure:15256: checking for libgmp
> configure:15286: cc -qlanglvl=extc89 -o conftest -g
> -I/usr/local/include conftest.
On 16/04/2008, at 4:33 AM, fchan wrote:
This part of clamav-0.92 and new fix of a bug.
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=613
And in short we need to get gcc4.1.1 or newer to get this work on
Macintosh 10.4.11 and xcode 2.5 which only has an gcc 4.0.1. However
Apple hasn't r
> Can I either(thru sendmail, clamav, or clamav-milter):
> Quarantine all messages from a particular IP ?
You can (thru sendmail). Append 'access' file from sendmail as follow:
Connect:aaa.bbb.ccc.dddQUARANTINE
Michael
___
Help us build a comprehensive
James Brown wrote:
>
>>
>>> John Rudd wrote:
Oh, and, while we're on the subject, what about 0.88.6? is that
version
vulnerable? (don't tell me to upgrade -- I haven't been able to get
newer versions to compile on Mac OS X 10.4.x)
>
> Frank & John, I've used ./configure --e
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>
John Rudd wrote:
> Oh, and, while we're on the subject, what about 0.88.6? is that
> version
> vulnerable? (don't tell me to upgrade -- I haven't been able to get
> newer versions to compile on Mac OS X 10.4.x)
>> Frank & John, I
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> James Brown wrote:
>>
> John Rudd wrote:
>> Oh, and, while we're on the subject, what about 0.88.6? is that
>> version
>> vulnerable? (don't tell me to upgrade -- I haven't been able to get
>> newer versions to compile on Mac
53 matches
Mail list logo
