Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Nigel Horne
Run "clamscan --debug " and look for the message Deal with message number -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Adjudicator, Arranger, Band Trainer, Composer, Tutor, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ___

[Clamav-users] clamav error - please help

2007-10-02 Thread K.Deepak
Hi, I am running clam version 0.91.2 in CentOS 5 . For the past 24 hours, I am getting tons of errors of this message Tue Oct 2 10:08:17 2007 -> ERROR: accept() failed: à óÿ¿^? Tue Oct 2 10:08:17 2007 -> ERROR: ScanStream 31440: accept() failed. Tue Oct 2 10:08:17 2007 -> ERROR: ScanStrea

Re: [Clamav-users] No Support for Digital Signatures

2007-10-02 Thread Paul Arnone
Thanks. I updated the GMP library using portupgrade and then I installed ClamAV-0.91.2 from source code. When I run pkg_info -r clamav-0.91.2 I get "can't find package 'clamav-0.91.2' installed or in a file" and when I run portupgrade -fR clamav-0.91.2 I get "no such installed package". Paul Arn

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Micah
> > You want to use clamscan for something it was not designed to do, it was > designed to detect viruses and that's all. > Yes, I do want to use clamscan for something it was not (quite) designed to do. However, given the fact that the designers built in the ability to parse multi-message email

Re: [Clamav-users] No Support for Digital Signatures

2007-10-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
Paul Arnone wrote: > Thanks. I updated the GMP library using portupgrade and then I installed > ClamAV-0.91.2 from source code. When I run pkg_info -r clamav-0.91.2 I get > "can't find package 'clamav-0.91.2' installed or in a file" and when I run > portupgrade -fR clamav-0.91.2 I get "no such in

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nigel Horne wrote: > Run "clamscan --debug " and look for the message > Deal with message number > > -Nigel I have to say, that is about the worst way I've seen yet to nail down a positive as there is a lot of debris to wade through, and there's no indication in the output that a virus has b

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Christoph Cordes
Am 02.10.2007 um 19:24 schrieb Dennis Peterson: > Can anyone offer a reason why the OP found a virus in the mbox file > but not in the > split out maildir messages? That kind of inconsistency is unsettling. Just read my reply to one of your mails. -- Best regards, Christoph _

[Clamav-users] Clamav disabling and problems

2007-10-02 Thread James Nunnerley
Major problems with exim and clamav. I've recently, and I think, mistakenly tried to update my FC6 to FC7 using yum, and now all my mail has broken. Exim would seem to be working fine, but I can't work out why Clamav isn't. Firstly, can someone give me a quick idea how I can disable cla

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christoph Cordes wrote: > Am 02.10.2007 um 19:24 schrieb Dennis Peterson: > >> Can anyone offer a reason why the OP found a virus in the mbox file >> but not in the >> split out maildir messages? That kind of inconsistency is unsettling. > > Just read my reply to one of your mails. I don't see

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav disabling and problems

2007-10-02 Thread René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 James Nunnerley wrote: [snip] > Firstly, can someone give me a quick idea how I can disable clamav from the > exim config? In /etc/exim.conf comment or change the line that starts with: av_scanner = ... to #av_scanner = ... av_scanner = > Secon

Re: [Clamav-users] No Support for Digital Signatures

2007-10-02 Thread Paul Arnone
After I first upgraded ClamAV and discovered the issue regarding digital signatures, I used portupgrade to get the latest GNU MP library and then re-installed ClamAV. I'm not sure what "make reinstall" would do at this point. Thanks for your help. Paul Arnone Network Administrator --

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting line numbers

2007-10-02 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 10:24 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Can anyone offer a reason why the OP found a virus in the mbox file but not > in the > split out maildir messages? That kind of inconsistency is unsettling. Rather easy I guess, given your analysis of the RE earlier. :) Caveat: I have