Graeme Nichols schrieb:
> On 15/09/2007, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> John Rudd wrote:
>> > Graeme Nichols wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anyone any ideas please?
>> >
>> > Build and install from source?
>>
>> Works every time it's tried as the rpm creators have discovered.
>
> One option.
Hi,
I am using Debian. I have some problems with clamav.
This is my freshclam log:
Ignoring mirror 193.92.150.194 (too often connections with outdated version)
ERROR: getpatch: Can't download daily-4284.cdiff from database.clamav.net
WARNING: Incremental update failed, trying to down
Upgrading to 0.91.2 will help...
(:
Steve
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:13:06 +0300
Özgür Öçalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using Debian. I have some problems with clamav.
>
>
>
> This is my freshclam log:
>
>
>
> Ignoring mirror 193.92.150.194 (too often connections wi
Hello,
since yesterday I have a similar problem on OS 10.4.10 Server with
0.91.2 installed:
ClamAV update process started at Mon Sep 17 15:45:35 2007
Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
TTL: 286
Software version from DNS: 0.91.2
main.cvd version from DNS: 44
main.cvd is up to date (version: 44, sigs:
Hi,
I have been running clamAV 0.91.2 software on our Solaris email server
for a few weeks and all has been well, but I have noticed in the last
few days that "clamscan" does not end on a specific HTML email.
I have caught the email and run clamscan by hand on the file and this
what happens:
Forget to include debug output:
LibClamAV debug: Phishing: looking up in whitelist:
http://mail.sxdtdx.edu.cn/.eBay.com/link.php:http://cgi4.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?AccountConfirmco_partnerId=2&pUserId=&siteid=0&pageType;
host-only:0
LibClamAV debug: Looking up in regex_list:
http://mail.sx
Andrew Watkins wrote:
> I have been running clamAV 0.91.2 software on our Solaris email server
> for a few weeks and all has been well, but I have noticed in the last
> few days that "clamscan" does not end on a specific HTML email.
ClamAV's PhishingScanURLs regex code runs afoul of the Solaris
"Graeme Nichols" schrieb:
> 2. Why has there been a change in the packaging of clamav? Freshclam is
> essential to the operation of clamav and *should* be in the same package as
> clamav.
Not necessarily. There are other ways to update your signature
database; you may copy it from a host connecte
