Re: [Clamav-users] answer to PING while loading virus db

2007-01-25 Thread Aleksander
Noel Jones wrote: To make yours less sensitive to transient failures, you can change it to: if failed host 127.0.0.1 port 3310 type tcp protocol clamav timeout 30 seconds 2 times then restart I'm aware of the timeout and times options, I consider them to be workarounds as well. I was

RE: [Clamav-users] Trojan Peacomm?

2007-01-25 Thread Randal, Phil
Galactic wrote: > Seems it is already in the DB as something else, > Trojan.Downloader-6xx. > Norton was stripping the file from my email so I couldn't > read the headers > on it. Not sure why it was slipping past ClamAV however. When > I tried to > upload these 3 files postcard.exe, Full Clip.exe

[Clamav-users] scan performance

2007-01-25 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I recently noticed a mail problem and after crawling the logfiles I saw that one of the "performance killers" is clamd(scan). I have a (e.g.) PPT file with a size of 10M and clamdscan takes about 90 seconds to scan it. If I put the file to a ramdisk (OpenBSD, P4 2GHz, 1G of RAM) it still t

Re: [Clamav-users] scan performance

2007-01-25 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote: > I don't want to discuss about performance in general, I would just like to > know if this is "normal" and/or if there is a way to tune up that process. > > I use 0.88.7 Yes, it is normal for 0.88.x The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performan