[Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
Since the repeated advice has been to run CVS, I'm going to repeat the question - is there a recomended snapshot date that is more likely to run than others ? Would it be possible to pick a good date and publish a beta ? Something that may have problems, but at least is known to compile and ru

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* On 30/08/06 11:53 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: | | Since the repeated advice has been to run CVS, I'm going to repeat the | question - is there a recomended snapshot date that is more likely to run | than others ? | | Would it be possible to pick a good date and publish a beta ? Some

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Milter Woes...

2006-08-30 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 12:31:44PM -0700, .rp wrote: >> > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav',`S=unix:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock, >> > F=T, T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl >You use clamav as the milter? Is this better than using clamav-milter as the >milter? It's just a

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Milter + Postfix

2006-08-30 Thread Dan MacNeil
Jim Holland writes: You will need to check to see whether your version of Postfix is fully supported - I understand that there has been a recent code update to Postfix which might have introduced some incompatibilities with MailScanner. These will be sorted out by MailScanner's developer as soo

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread clamavusers
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:47:01PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > * On 30/08/06 11:53 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: [...] > | Would it be possible to pick a good date and publish a beta ? Something > that > | may have problems, but at least is known to compile and run at least for 10

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:32:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >oh well - i for one am too stupid to work with cvs code: >__cut__ >clamav-milter.o(.text+0x81f1): In function `main': >: undefined reference to `__res_query' >clamav-milter.o(.text+0x

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread clamavusers
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:47:34PM -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: [...] > >clamav-milter.o(.text+0x910a): In function `main': > >: undefined reference to `__dn_skipname' > > > Those headers are provided by glibc-devel on most rpm based systems. Do > you have that installed? Mine compiled with ./confi

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:22:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >btw: ./configure && make is working here, too; the --enable-milter part >is giving me difficulties... Yeah, I got the error too. I poked at it for a bit, but I didn't get any furth

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Andrzej Migdalski
Todd Lyons wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:22:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw: ./configure && make is working here, too; the --enable-milter part is giving me difficulties... Yeah, I got the error too. I poked at it for a bit, but I didn't get any further than you. A simple fix

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Stephen Gran
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:11:42PM -0700, Todd Lyons said: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:22:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >btw: ./configure && make is working here, too; the --enable-milter part > >is giving me difficulties... > > Yeah, I got the error too. I poked at it for a bit, bu

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread Stephen Gran
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:13:21AM +0100, Stephen Gran said: > -AC_CHECK_HEADER(resolv.h,[FRESHCLAM_LIBS="$FRESHCLAM_LIBS $resolv_lib"; > AC_DEFINE(HAVE_RESOLV_H,1,have resolv.h)], AC_MSG_WARN([** DNS support > disabled])) > +AC_CHECK_HEADER(resolv.h,[FRESHCLAM_LIBS="$FRESHCLAM_LIBS $

Re: [Clamav-users] high clamd CPU load on Solaris

2006-08-30 Thread David Blank-Edelman
Hi Nigel- On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: Repeating advice already given here: the engine in 0.88 is *old*. If performance is an issue upgrade to the code in CVS. Thanks for your response. We'll definitely look at doing that. Just to confirm: you would expect clamd processe

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread christian
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 02:11:42PM -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: [...] > Do this: > make # it will fail at the point you see > pushd clamav-milter; /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -lnsl -o > clamav-milter cfgparser.o output.o getopt.o memory.o misc.o network.o > clamav-milter.o ../libc

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread christian
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Andrzej Migdalski wrote: > I'd been getting the same error since about two weeks ago and had to > manually add -lresolv to clamav-milter LIBS. thank you. with LDFLAGS='-lresolv' ./configure it's working... > Just recently i found that it was triggered b

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Milter + Postfix

2006-08-30 Thread clamav-list
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Dan MacNeil wrote: > Jim Holland writes: > > You will need to check to see whether your version of Postfix is fully > > supported - I understand that there has been a recent code update to > > Postfix which might have introduced some incompatibilities with > > MailScanner. Th

Re: [Clamav-users] Recomended nightly snap, or beta version ?

2006-08-30 Thread christian
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:13:21AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > --- > diff -Nru clamav-devel-latest/configure.in > clamav-devel-latest.new/configure.in > --- clamav-devel-latest/configure.in2006-08-26 02:30:04.0 +0