What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for not
having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then?
I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile()
could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING when appropriate :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per Jessen wrote:
What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for not
having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then?
I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile()
could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING when appropriate :-)
It has always been p
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for
>> not having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then?
>> I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile()
>> could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING when appr
Hi
Like to say hello I am new to the list, I have a small question to ask. I
have setup clamav and amavisd on fedora core 5 every thing seems to be fine
but I would like to ask how do I modify the /etc/sysconfig/freshclam file? I
know it is pretty self explanatory but just to make sure where it say
Per Jessen wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for
not having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then?
I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile()
could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING w
Hi
Now I have clamav and amavisd in and running is there a viable way of
testing the email system to check all is working ok?
Kind Regards Martyn
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Martyn Clark wrote:
> Hi
> Now I have clamav and amavisd in and running is there a viable way of
> testing the email system to check all is working ok?
>
> Kind Regards Martyn
>
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
--
Steve
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/l
Steve
Thanks for that very compressive tests
Kind Regards Martyn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Stern
Sent: 15 April 2006 23:18
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] testing clamav
Martyn Clark wrote:
> Hi
> Now I have cl
Hi
I just run mail tests form link Steve was kind enough to send me and only
one got through: this one
(Non-Virus): Attachment with a CLSID extension which may hide the real file
extension. This does not include the EICAR virus, however your mail server
should still block this since the CLSID tec
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:45:40PM +0100, Martyn Clark said:
> Hi
> I just run mail tests form link Steve was kind enough to send me and only
> one got through: this one
> (Non-Virus): Attachment with a CLSID extension which may hide the real file
> extension. This does not include the EICAR viru
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 23:45 +0100, Martyn Clark wrote:
> Hi
> I just run mail tests form link Steve was kind enough to send me and only
> one got through: this one
> (Non-Virus): Attachment with a CLSID extension which may hide the real file
> extension. This does not include the EICAR virus, how
Hi, I am running ClamXav with the 0.88 engine on a Powerbook G4.
I have just checked my provider with the webmail.us/testvirus set.
#5, #15, #22 and #23 went though into my account without ClamXav
Sentry showing any interest. A manual scan did not flag them up either.
How come? Is there anyt
Per Jessen wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for
not having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then?
I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile()
could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING w
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Here's a script that should work. Read the assumptions carefully and
> mind the emailer linewrapping in logger strings:
Thanks Dennis, just the sort of thing I was hoping for.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/
14 matches
Mail list logo
