Dennis Peterson wrote: > Per Jessen wrote: >> What's the current schedule for 0.90? And what are my options (for >> not having clamav consider phishing==virus) until then? >> I'm using libclamav programmatically - I don't suppose cl_scanfile() >> could be convinced to return CL_PHISHING when appropriate :-) > > It has always been possible to unpack the pattern files and remove the > parts you don't like. The various parts are clearly marked.
OK, thanks - I'll have to look into that. Any reference info you could point me to? Or just RTFM? /Per Jessen, Zürich _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
