"James Miller" schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav.
It is (and was) here:
| 2006-01-18 09:34:18 [...] H=p54a7c5f6.dip.t-dialin.net (amd2)
[84.167.197.246] F=[...] rejected after DATA: This message contains a virus
(Worm.VB-8).
"Worm.VB-8" is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PRO
Thomas Hochstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "James Miller" schrieb:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not be picked up by clamav.
>
> It is (and was) here:
>
> | 2006-01-18 09:34:18 [...] H=p54a7c5f6.dip.t-dialin.net (amd2)
> [84.167.197.246] F=[...] rejected after DATA: This message contains a virus
> (
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Thomas Hochstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Worm.VB-8" is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the
> > advisories I read.
> I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On 2/16 and
Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is f
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 06:11:13PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> She doesn't have version 1245, as explained earlier. She probably has
> a
> DNS server returning the wrong version, and she should look into why
> that is. Maybe one of her forwarders caches too long or something.
But she was using
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Thomas Hochstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Worm.VB-8" is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the
advisories I read.
I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On 2/16 and
Not true. Th
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53 EST on Jan 17 .
> That all depends on your time zone. EST in Australia may be different to EST
> somewhere else. Let's not get into a fight over this.
I mean GMT-0500 . I wasn't aware there were a
Bill Maidment wrote:
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote:
Thomas Hochstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Worm.VB-8" is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the
advisories I read.
I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Bill Maidment wrote:
Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53 EST on Jan 17 .
That all depends on your time zone. EST in Australia may be different to EST
somewhere else. Let's not get into a fight over this.
I mean GMT-050
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:34:26 +1100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (My state is "oh dear I need another beer")
A man has to believe in something, and I believe I'll have another beer.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http:
Bill Maidment wrote:
> (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of
> the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different
> from/than everyone else).
> Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh
I'm not entirely sure, either. Instinctually, DD-MM- seems just as
funky to
> Probably we should all start using ISO-8601 -MM-DD format since
> otherwise half the dates in the year are ambiguous. Call it a friendly
> compromise.
Actually, DD-MM-YY is standard in the U.S. military, as is 24-hr time.
But I like JT's suggestion - It makes it OH SO EASY to sort-by-date.
On 1/19/06 7:41 AM, "JT Justman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Probably we should all start using ISO-8601 -MM-DD format since
> otherwise half the dates in the year are ambiguous. Call it a friendly
> compromise.
Which is what we started using in-house several months ago.
What's wrong with
Is there a way to rewrite subject line and include name of a virus in it?
Chris
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
veral months ago.
I would describe today as "2006/1/19", myself, rather than "2006-1-19", but the
ISO standard date format using hyphens is fine.
Big-endian timestamps are unambiguous and sort numerically into proper
cronological order, ie, 20060119 is before 2006020
> > (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of
> > the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different
> > from/than everyone else).
> > Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh
It's written as it's spoken, I think. Today's date is 'January 19th, 2006,'
not '19 January
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:16:38 -0500 (EST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is there a way to rewrite subject line and include name of a virus in it?
To do so would be a function of your MTA, it is not within the remit of
ClamAV to do this as it only returns the fact of a det
On 1/19/2006 5:16 PM +0100, Krzys wrote:
Is there a way to rewrite subject line and include name of a virus in it?
Chris
No, perhaps your mail filtering software (which calls clamav) can.
regards,
Niek
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.
On 1/19/2006 1:13 PM +0100, Payal Rathod wrote:
But she was using her own dns server without any forwarder at all.
With warm regards,
-Payal
ok
regards,
Niek
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
- Original Message -
From: "Shayne Lebrun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of
> the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different
> from/than everyone else).
> Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh
It's written as it's spoke
On 1/19/2006 5:46 PM +0100, M.S. Lucas wrote:
It's written as it's spoken, I think. Today's date is 'January 19th,
2006,'
not '19 January, 2006' or '2006, January, 19.'
In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like
15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three'
Yeh and we say meters not 3 fee
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:46:21 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "M.S. Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like
> 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three'
That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal
shorthand for half *past* four whereas t
All Americans is a pretty broad finger to point. North America alone consist of
Canada, the US and Mexico. I think that you should limit your frustration to
the US alone.
Jerry K
(I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of
the day -- it makes no logical sense oth
Brian Morrison wrote:
> M.S. Lucas wrote:
>
> > In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like
> > 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three'
>
> That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal
> shorthand for half *past* four whereas the Dutch (and German IIRC) is
> more liter
I recently installed ClavAV on my FreeBSD 5.4 system. I am running
Sendmail as my MTA.
Clam seems to be working fine except for one small thing.
First, this is the entry I have in my /etc/rc.conf file for Clam.
clamav_clamd_enable="YES" # Enable ClamAV
clamav_freshclam_enable="YES" # Ena
Hello,
First time posting to the list here. Perhaps this should have gone to the
developers list though - not sure.
Some of us over at the logwatch list have noticed that freshclam syslog
entries were not being detected by the logwatch filters. The cause of this
turned out to be that entries to
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Brian Morrison wrote:
M.S. Lucas wrote:
In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like
15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three'
That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal
shorthand for half *past* four whereas the Dutch (and German IIRC) is
mor
26 matches
Mail list logo
