On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 22:11 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> One follow-up question: I currently use clamav-milter to integrate
> clamav w/ sendmail. Would I be better served by using amavisd-new, or
> does clamav-milter cover the ground good? It sounds to me, based on
> your comments above, that a
I thought I upgraded to version .86 a few weeks ago but when I view
the headers of a message that has been run through clamav I find the
following.
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84rc2, clamav-milter version 0.84e
on mymail.mydomain.com
I checked the clamav tab in webmin and I found this
Clam
The version intsall is zlib-devel 1.2.1.2-1.1. Is that where my problem is?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 15, 2005 12:57 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] AES-256 Encryption?
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 11:40 -0700, Johnny Stor
On 18/07/05, Tim Macrina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I upgraded to version .86 a few weeks ago but when I view
> the headers of a message that has been run through clamav I find the
> following.
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84rc2, clamav-milter version 0.84e
> on mymail.mydomain.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 18, 2005, at 6:42 AM, Tim Macrina wrote:
> I thought I upgraded to version .86 a few weeks ago but when I view
> the headers of a message that has been run through clamav I find the
> following.
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84rc2, clama
