On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:31, Mike Sanchez wrote:
> I run clamd .80 on Solaris 2.7 and call File::Scan::ClamAV from perl to scan
> messages.
>
> With .80 top shows clamd < 5%, but on occasion once or twice a week climbs
> to 20% - 30%. Really bogs down the system until clamd is restarted.
>
>
On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
>
> I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
> clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It outputs the
> following in debug mode:
>
> LibClamAV de
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It outputs the
following in debug mode:
LibClamAV deb
Well, I've finally got all of the code working with PHP without
crashing FreeBSD or Mac OS X and it even seems to like ClamAV 0.85.
http://www.daleenterprise.com/info.php
and
http://www.daleenterprise.com/clamav_info.php
I've tried it on several different version of PHP from 4.3.2 to 5.0.4
and
On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
> > On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
> >>
> >>I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
> >>clamd started fine
On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
> > On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
> >>
> >>I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
> >>clamd started fine
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
clamd started fine but clamav-milte
On Friday 13 May 2005 11:34, George Chelidze wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
> > On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
> >
> >>Nigel Horne wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Hello,
>
> System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
>
George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It outputs the
following in debug mode:
LibClamAV debug: Running as user clamav (UID 101, GID 11)
Lib
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 11:34, George Chelidze wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this mor
On Friday 13 May 2005 11:52, George Chelidze wrote:
> George Chelidze wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
> >
> > I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
> > clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It outputs the
> > fol
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 11:34, George Chelidze wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 10:56, George Chelidze wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I t
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Friday 13 May 2005 11:52, George Chelidze wrote:
George Chelidze wrote:
Hello,
System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It outputs the
following in deb
On Friday 13 May 2005 01:43, Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Gotcha.. :) I thought it was more of a "the creator of rar 3 wasn't
> allowing anyone to create unrar programs without paying him tons of
> cash" type thing.. :)
Not. libunrar available as ftp://ftp.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-.tar.gz
It have on
All,
I found a different Freshclam result in Linux RH 9 and OpenNA Linux 1.0. In
OpenNA Linux 1.0, I *always* cannot run Freshclam with DNS (always fall to
HTTP Mode), even I use same hardware, ISP and DNS Server.
Does someone have same experience and solution of this issue?
Thx & Rgds,
Awie
George Chelidze said:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
>> On Friday 13 May 2005 07:21, George Chelidze wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>System: RH 7.3, kernel: 2.4.24, gcc 2.96
>>>
>>>I tried to upgrade to 0.85 this morning. Everything compiled just fine,
>>>clamd started fine but clamav-milter doesn't start. It out
Even though it's been a few weeks, I wanted to follow up to my problem.
When upgrading to 0.84 I ran into a problem where one of my
machines would no longer send mail notifications to postmaster. This turned
out to be my own fault. I built the binary on a machine that had a link
for sendmail
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:51:51AM -0400, Christopher X. Candreva said:
>
> Even though it's been a few weeks, I wanted to follow up to my problem.
>
> When upgrading to 0.84 I ran into a problem where one of my
> machines would no longer send mail notifications to postmaster. This turned
> ou
At 03:50 PM 5/12/2005, René Berber wrote:
>You wrote "Solaris 2.7" that's Solaris 7, I haven't seen it in a long
> time (I>use 8 and 9, haven't tried 10), does it even support multiple
CPUs?
Just for the benefit of the readers, Solaris 2.7 is synonymous to Solaris 7,
2.8 as Solaris 8 etc...
Mike
Hi all.
I am not sure if this has been asked in the past but I was wondering if
there is a way to get YUM to update/upgrade clamav.
Something along the lines of
yum update clamav
I am running FC3 with all the updates and Clamav 0.84
Cheers
___
http://lu
Follow the detailed instructions at qmailrocks.org !
Make certain to read each section, even if you don't need to perform
those operations, since you get the overall perspective.
In order to patch qmail, you stop the service, make it, restart it,
and you're good to go. One option that didn't wor
Sergio fernandez wrote:
I am not sure if this has been asked in the past but I was wondering if
there is a way to get YUM to update/upgrade clamav.
Something along the lines of
yum update clamav
I am running FC3 with all the updates and Clamav 0.84
Cheers
Dag Wieers' APT/Yum repository includes C
On Fri, 13 May 2005 17:35:06 +0100
Sergio fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if this has been asked in the past but I was wondering
> if there is a way to get YUM to update/upgrade clamav.
> Something along the lines of
> yum update clamav
> I am running FC3 with all the updates
Matt Fretwell wrote:
Mark wrote:
I understood your point perfectly. Why upgrade, using
precious time, when another upgrade may be required very shortly,
requiring said time to again be used. I am just pointing out a
pitfall. There is always a good excuse not to do something. It is,
however, exac
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 10:11 -0700, Bill Taroli wrote:
> Matt Fretwell wrote:
> I completely agree with your point. But taken from a different
> perspective, this may be one reason to justify that such a product not
> be used in production IT environments. The point should *not* be missed
> that
Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not seen a
single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very strange to
me. I was getting 5-10 per hour up until that point.
Anyone else see this?
Bowie
___
http://lurker.clam
Sergio fernandez wrote:
Hi all.
I am not sure if this has been asked in the past but I was wondering
if there is a way to get YUM to update/upgrade clamav.
Something along the lines of
yum update clamav
I am running FC3 with all the updates and Clamav 0.84
0.84 is last, stable *working* version.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:20, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 10:11 -0700, Bill Taroli wrote:
> > Matt Fretwell wrote:
>
> > I completely agree with your point. But taken from a different
> > perspective, this may be one reason to justify that such a product not
> > be used in pr
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not seen a
single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very strange to
me. I was getting 5-10 per hour up until that point.
Anyone else see this?
Today: 5 (so far)
Yesterday: 5
5/
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:20, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 10:11 -0700, Bill Taroli wrote:
Matt Fretwell wrote:
I completely agree with your point. But taken from a different
perspective, this may be one reason to justify that such a product not
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:21 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not seen a
> single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very strange to
> me. I was getting 5-10 per hour up until that point.
>
> Anyone else see this?
Yes, exc
Scott Call wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not
seen a
single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very
strange to
me. I was getting 5-10 per hour up until that point.
Anyone else see this?
Today: 5 (
Bill Taroli wrote:
> I completely agree with your point. But taken from a different
> perspective, this may be one reason to justify that such a product not
> be used in production IT environments. The point should *not* be missed
> that something so crucial to one's infrastructure -- that you
The windows nasty business is a very dynamic world. The frequent releases
are mostly responses to these changes.
Thanks for a great job !
John Phillips
I remember when FLYING was FUN and TV was FREE.
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Bill Taroli wrote:
> Matt Fretwell wrote:
>
> > Mark wrote:
> >
> >
>
>Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not seen a
>single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very strange to
>me. I was getting 5-10 per hour up until that point.
I saw a drop at the time you noted, but also a huge temporary
increase on the morning of 10
Matt Fretwell wrote:
Bill Taroli wrote:
I completely agree with your point. But taken from a different
perspective, this may be one reason to justify that such a product not
be used in production IT environments. The point should *not* be missed
that something so crucial to one's infrastructu
On Fri, 13 May 2005 18:51:12 +0200
Kritof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.84 is last, stable *working* version.
> 0.85 is buggy. Wait until someone fix it.
No, 0.84 is buggy.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.
Kri?tof Petr wanted us to know:
>0.84 is last, stable *working* version.
>0.85 is buggy. Wait until someone fix it.
0.83 worked for me.
0.84 worked for me.
0.85 is working for me.
My systems are small to medium level systems (around 100K emails/day).
Clam ran stable with 0.80, 0.83, 0.84, and if
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:28:35PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:21 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Is it just me, or did this virus disappear completely? I have not seen a
> > single instance of Sober.P since 8pm on May 9. This seems very strange to
> > me. I was get
sorry for the bad wrapping. not sure how to make yahoo do better than
that
--- René Berber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> email builder wrote:
> [snip]
> > Respectfully (you sound like you know a hell of a lot more than I do
> about
> > these things), the OP presumably (hopefully?) does more th
on clamscan with option -i, clamscan only show files
that infected by virus, but what option/setting i must
use for clamdscan to do the same way?
on clamscan:
clamscan -i --no-summary /home/user/file.zip
how to do the same with clamdscan? i try this:
clamdscan -i --no-summary /home/user/file.zip
41 matches
Mail list logo
