Joanna Roman wrote:
How are virues like IRC.LXD.A, IRC.Gadez.A encountered
Probably distributed to recipients through a Trojan-Downloader or Worm.
? When a user submit a virus, how do clamav team know
that they are of IRC types ??? Just curious .
Naming is often based on what other av-products may
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:14:08PM -0400, Tim Boyer wrote:
> Is there any centralized spam scanner available for Linux, a la
> Symantec Corporate? I'm using clam on my incoming mail servers, and
> the Symantec product protecting the desktops. But it's the only
> Windows server app I still have -
On 4/30/05, Tim Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, good time to ask my question.
>
> Is there any centralized spam scanner available for Linux, a la
> Symantec Corporate? I'm using clam on my incoming mail servers, and
> the Symantec product protecting the desktops. But it's the only
> Wi
Hello Scott Henderson @ Bunzl Phoenix,
> > 1. Upgrade to clamav-0.84rc2 - it is very stable.
> > Run freshclam to get a new copy of the viruses db.
> Thank you. I've never upgraded clam. Is there a white paper or HOWTO
> on this? I don't see one on the clamav.net site documentation. The
> ver
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:10:09 +0100, Rob MacGregor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 4/30/05, Tim Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> OK, good time to ask my question.
>>
>> Is there any centralized spam scanner available for Linux, a la
>> Symantec Corporate? I'm using clam on my incoming mail
Tim Boyer wrote:
> I'm running 3.0.3 on a couple of mail servers.
>
> Here's the nice thing about Symantec. I've got it set up on a central
> server. It polls the Symantec virus server, pushes the results down
> to the user's desktops, and updates. Without any user intervention.
The download
On Sun, 1 May 2005 03:19:13 +0100, Matt Fretwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> I'm running 3.0.3 on a couple of mail servers.
>>
>> Here's the nice thing about Symantec. I've got it set up on a central
>> server. It polls the Symantec virus server, pushes the results down
>>
On Sun, 1 May 2005 03:19:13 +0100, Matt Fretwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> I'm running 3.0.3 on a couple of mail servers.
>>
>> Here's the nice thing about Symantec. I've got it set up on a central
>> server. It polls the Symantec virus server, pushes the results down
>>
