On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:55:05 +0600 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Prasad"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
> Pl. help me if somebody knows that.
It's a warning that the DNS lookup didn't work, fresh
Try as I might I cannot reproduce your problem.
Please send me a copy of the mail which reproduces
the error when you scan it.
-Nigel Horne
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bernhard
> Erdmann
> Sent: 06 December 2004 05:51
> To: ClamAV u
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 07:25 +0100, Bernhard Erdmann wrote:
> > I should have said that you will need to do this with the
> > current version from CVS - my mistake!
>
> Here's another segfault using clamd-devel:
I can't understand this, unless your clamd-devel is not the latest.
> #0 parseMime
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy
> Kitchen
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:51 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] RE: Re: This is how I use ClamAV
>
>
> On Friday 03 December 2004 09:44 am, Kiril Todorov wr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matias Lopez
> Bergero
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 2:40 PM
>
>
> > We use Sendmail 8.13.0 (since 8.12.11) + Clamav-milter + Clamd.
> > No quarantine, no postmaster/sender/recipient notice, just
> reje
Thanks .. that was just what I needed.
Sergey wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2004 12:01, Søren Schimkat wrote:
Im using Clamav with sendmail, and i've chosen to quarantine infected
mail. My question is - what can I do with the files / emails that has
been quarantined? Could they be resend someho
Søren Schimkat wrote:
Thanks .. that was just what I needed.
Sergey wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2004 12:01, Søren Schimkat wrote:
Im using Clamav with sendmail, and i've chosen to quarantine
infected mail. My question is - what can I do with the files /
emails that has been quarantined? Could
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:57:24 +0700 (WIT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I send myself an easy email virus [one of the bagel variants] as an
> > attachment, and voila! clamav doesn't catch it.
>
> And when i move it from inbox to another mail folder
> (/var/spool/mail/christopher to /home/christopher
> I use Clam AV on a linux server to scan all incoming email. The email is
> then passed on to my Exchange server which also scans all emails for
> viruses using Panda AV.
>The problem is that every day I get a lot of emails getting through the
>clam scanning and then the viruses are picked up on t
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 03:52:51 +1000
"Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you haven't stated how you call clamav I'm not sure if it's
> relevant, but I used to have the same problem.
> I run on a windows box and call clamscan (not clamdscan) on each
> email. If I didn't use the --mbox option those
Hi guys,
I'm way too lost in the installation process of ClamAV and ClamAV-milter.
I've downloaded ClamAV 0.80 and ClamAV-milter 0.80 in RPM packages; iv'e
been told to read on the clamav-milter/INSTALL file to know how to install
both packages and get it fine tuned with OpenWebmail. I'm lost.
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>If you do ls -l in /tmp you'll be able to see the socket if it exists.
>And check the permissions on /tmp from /, it needs to be 666 I think.
Most people use mode 1777 for /tmp directory.
--
Regards... Todd
OS X: We've been fighting the "It's a mac
Sasa Stupar wanted us to know:
>Guys, how do you make this stats? I am running Sendmail 8.13.1 on FC3
>with clamav-milter. Is there some settings on sendmail or Clamav?
cat /var/log/clamav/clamd.log | showviruses.pl
The showviruses.pl is attached to this email. It's very very simple, no
error c
#0 parseMimeHeader (m=0x84b0ba0,
cmd=0x85356ae ";
name=\"/usr/local/apache/htdocs/ftp/www.pressedienst.saarland.de/prd/anhaenge/anhang_6781.pdf\"",
rfc821Table=0x84aa5c8, arg=0x0)
at string2.h:1092
#1 0x4002faac in parseEmailHeader (m=0x84b0ba0,
line=0x85356a0 "Content-Type", rfc821
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Lyons wrote:
| Sasa Stupar wanted us to know:
|
|
|>Guys, how do you make this stats? I am running Sendmail 8.13.1 on FC3
|>with clamav-milter. Is there some settings on sendmail or Clamav?
|
|
| cat /var/log/clamav/clamd.log | showviruses.pl
|
| T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasa Stupar wrote:
| Todd Lyons wrote:
| | Sasa Stupar wanted us to know:
| |
| |
| |>Guys, how do you make this stats? I am running Sendmail 8.13.1 on FC3
| |>with clamav-milter. Is there some settings on sendmail or Clamav?
| |
| |
| | cat /var/log/cl
Hello, my question is simple and i hope someone can tell me the answer :).
I have my postfix with amavis-new. The problem that i have is that
one of the email went to the /var/virusmail folder that is the one
configured for quarantine virus emails. Im sure that the email is 100
% secure so i want
#0 parseMimeHeader (m=0x84b0ba0,
cmd=0x85356ae ";
name=\"/usr/local/apache/htdocs/ftp/www.pressedienst.saarland.de/prd/anhaenge/anhang_6781.pdf\"",
rfc821Table=0x84aa5c8, arg=0x0)
at string2.h:1092
#1 0x4002faac in parseEmailHeader (m=0x84b0ba0,
line=0x85356a0 "Content-Type", rfc821
Nigel Horne wrote:
Try as I might I cannot reproduce your problem.
Please send me a copy of the mail which reproduces
the error when you scan it.
Don't know how to get a copy. The mail is scanned before accepting it.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
__
I've got clamd running on TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 and TCPSocket 3310 as a
requirement and I need to test it by sending something to it and
checking for some kind of response, the docs that came with ClamAV
offer no help.
-- Dale
___
http://lists.clamav.net/
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:42:38 -0500
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got clamd running on TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 and TCPSocket 3310 as a
> requirement and I need to test it by sending something to it and
> checking for some kind of response, the docs that came with ClamAV
> offer no help.
Try with
http://www.testvirus.org/
You´ll be able to test you antivirus.
Good Luck
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:44:30 +0100, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:42:38 -0500
> Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got clamd running on TCPAddr 127.0.0.1 and TCPSocke
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:50:21 -0800 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>
> >If you do ls -l in /tmp you'll be able to see the socket if it
> >exists. And check the permissions on /tmp from /, it needs to be 666
> >I think.
>
> Most people
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:05:24 +
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:50:21 -0800 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
> >
> > >If you do ls -l in /tmp you'll be able to see the socket if it
> > >exists
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 23:13:15 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Fair enough, I meant to say _at least_ 666
>
> a) 666 wouldn't allow to enter the directory
> b) 777 would allow all users to remove files owned by others
>
> Only 1777 is proper for _public
>> Could someone offer me some assistance so I can find out where this is
>> breaking for me?
I use the unofficial port, and it works great.
I had to do some pthread and lib fiddling to get it to build natively
on my 3.6 machines.
Benny
--
"... i want to be a farting burping maniac."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:59:37 -0600 (CST)
"C. Bensend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the unofficial port, and it works great.
>
> I had to do some pthread and lib fiddling to get it to build nativel
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 02:54:44PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Jan Pieter Cornet wanted us to know:
> >What I find really odd is your complete lack of Worm.Sober-I. Our stats for
> >Thu Dec 2:
>
> Good point. I had totally missed that too.
>
> >Top-5:
> >W32/Sober-I : 1078544
> >W32/Netsk
ed wanted us to know:
>Can you state what you did in both cases, I had to modify the headers to
>get past curl include.. but that didn't get me a build.
There are some environment variable that you can set to specify
arguments to gcc, such as additional include paths and additional
library paths.
Well I found a solution using telnet 127.0.0.1 3310 (STREAM) to get the
actual communication port, and in issuing a telnet 127.0.0.1 (paste data followed by the required EOF) and it appears to work.
-- Dale
On Dec 06, 2004, at 15:44, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:42:38 -0500
Dale Wals
> There are some environment variable that you can set to specify
> arguments to gcc, such as additional include paths and additional
> library paths. Something like:
> CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib"
>
> I don't often have to specify them, so I can't remember exactly what
> they
> We (the users) don't want your signature. We want you to submit an
> infected file, so the maintainers can develop a signature. The reason
> is simple: we don't trust you. It would be too easy for a malicious
> person to contribute a signature that would cause false positives.
>
> Damian Mens
Dale Walsh wrote:
Well I found a solution using telnet 127.0.0.1 3310 (STREAM) to get the
actual communication port, and in issuing a telnet 127.0.0.1 (paste data followed by the required EOF) and it appears to work.
-- Dale
Telnet to that port and type in:
SCAN (or RAWSCAN) /path_to_file_or_dir
33 matches
Mail list logo
