I get this error with sendmail 8.13.1 (Deferred 451 4.3.2 Please try again
later ), when I have in clamd.conf USER clamav specified, but don`t know
why.
Without setting USER it`s OK, but I don`t like this warning in log :
spamd[835]: info: setuid to root succeeded
spamd[835]: Still running as root:
not a bug, but maybe a samll wish for a small feature:
being a devout user of clamav-milter, and changing my clamav package
ever so often upon the current recommendations of the development team,
i always try to shutdown sendmail, calamav-milter, freshclam, and clamd
prior to replacing the cla
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:51:25 -0600 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark
Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # freshclam
> freshclam: relocation error: freshclam: undefined symbol: cli_strtok
>
> What means this and how do I correct it? Google is silent on the
> whole thing.
Not sure, but it might be th
christian laubscher wrote:
not a bug, but maybe a samll wish for a small feature:
being a devout user of clamav-milter, and changing my clamav package
ever so often upon the current recommendations of the development team,
i always try to shutdown sendmail, calamav-milter, freshclam, and clamd
On Sunday 24 Oct 2004 09:02, Břetislav Kubesa wrote:
> I get this error with sendmail 8.13.1 (Deferred 451 4.3.2 Please try again
> later ), when I have in clamd.conf USER clamav specified, but don`t know
> why.
What lines do you get above that message (say the previous dozen)?
What operating syst
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:36:52 +0100
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 24 Oct 2004 09:02, BÅetislav Kubesa wrote:
> > I get this error with sendmail 8.13.1 (Deferred 451 4.3.2 Please try
> > again
> > later ), when I have in clamd.conf USER clamav specified, but don`t
> > know
> > w
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 02:23:10PM +1000, Robert S said:
> Thanks. That's exactly what I did. When I try to stop clamav-milter in
> supervised mode, clamav-milter remains in memory. When I try to restart it
> I get the following:
>
> Oct 24 14:19:14 debian clamav-milter: clamav-milter: fatal:
Okay, it appears the Mandrake Linux update system hasn't caught up with
developers yet. Urpmi offers only ver. 061. I upgraded from 0.61, when
notified a few days ago that it was outdated, to the packages in
"clamav-0.80-1mdk.1bcr.i586.rpm" from ftp.neocat.org. I had to force
the installati
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:13:41 -0600
Mark Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, it appears the Mandrake Linux update system hasn't caught up
> with
> developers yet. Urpmi offers only ver. 061. I upgraded from 0.61,
> when
> notified a few days ago that it was outdated, to the packages in
>
On 10/24/2004 6:13 PM +0200, Mark Adams wrote:
Okay, it appears the Mandrake Linux update system hasn't caught up with
developers yet. Urpmi offers only ver. 061. I upgraded from 0.61, when
notified a few days ago that it was outdated, to the packages in
"clamav-0.80-1mdk.1bcr.i586.rpm" from
On Oct 24, 2004, at 06:30, Joe Maimon wrote:
i guess it would be simpler for a lot of users if'kill `cat
/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.pid`
would get honoured.
On FreeBSD 4 that works fine. However, because sendmail-milter is
integrated with sendmail, it has a fair amount of cleanup that is
I recently noticed the "installation is OUTDATED" messages showing up in my 0.7 installs of Clam. I downloaded and installed 0.80rc4, but when I run freshclam, I'm still seeing:WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !WARNING: Current functionality level = 2, requi
Tom Kreiner wrote:
>-V to confirm the version. It returned:
>
>ClamAV 0.80rc4/548/Sat Oct 23 20:50:33 2004
>
>Is there something else that I need to do?
Upgrade to 0.80?
Ralph
--
Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .."Text processing has made it possible
Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:52:13PM -0400, Tom Kreiner said:
>
> I recently noticed the "installation is OUTDATED" messages showing up in
> my 0.7 installs of Clam. I downloaded and installed 0.80rc4, but when I
> run freshclam, I'm still seeing:
>
>
> WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATE
Niek wrote:
On 10/24/2004 6:13 PM +0200, Mark Adams wrote:
Okay, it appears the Mandrake Linux update system hasn't caught up
with developers yet. Urpmi offers only ver. 061. I upgraded from
0.61, when notified a few days ago that it was outdated, to the
packages in "clamav-0.80-1mdk.1bcr.i58
Mark Adams wrote:
Niek wrote:
On 10/24/2004 6:13 PM +0200, Mark Adams wrote:
Okay, it appears the Mandrake Linux update system hasn't caught up
with developers yet. Urpmi offers only ver. 061. I upgraded from
0.61, when notified a few days ago that it was outdated, to the
packages in "clamav-
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >> Use the source Luke.
> >
> >
> > I've got a bad feeling about this.
> >
>
> If you have a reasonably well configured system (for dev work - gcc,
> etc) it will compile and install quickly. Read the dox - clamav.conf is
> gone, replace by clamd.conf. Freshclam has a
Matt wrote:
What's the worst that can happen? It fails to compile, and you still need
to find a packaged version. You'll be no worse off than you are now.
The worst that can happen? I descend once again into dependency hell
and spend hours loosing my mind over this. I totally alienate my sens
>Tom Kreiner wrote:>> -V to confirm the version. It returned:>> >> ClamAV 0.80rc4/548/Sat Oct 23 20:50:33 2004>> >> Is there something else that I need to do?>Upgrade to 0.80? >RalphThanks Ralph. For some reason, I thought an "rc" was an update to a recent release. I guess if I had taken the time t
Hi
> For some reason, I thought an "rc" was an update to a recent release.
No.
RC is "Release Candidate" and therefor better than beta, but not stable for
sure yet.
Regards,
Steffen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
http://l
Tom Kreiner wrote:
Thanks Ralph. For some reason, I thought an "rc" was an update to a
recent release. I guess if I had taken the time to look at the time
stamps on the files, I would have realized otherwise. It now appears to
be working.
Yeah, there are s many acronyms! FYI, 'rc' refers to
Yes - I do have "Foreground" specified.
I can only assume that there is something wrong with my version of "daemon".
I compiled it from the original source from http://www.libslack.org/daemon/
. According to the debian website it is only available in "testing" and
"unstable". Because my serv
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:39:08AM +1000, Robert S said:
> Yes - I do have "Foreground" specified.
>
> I can only assume that there is something wrong with my version of "daemon".
> I compiled it from the original source from http://www.libslack.org/daemon/
> . According to the debian website
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:51:25 -0600 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark
Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# freshclam
freshclam: relocation error: freshclam: undefined symbol: cli_strtok
What means this and how do I correct it? Google is silent on the
whole thing.
Not sure, but i
I have ClamAV 0.80 (via FreeBSD ports) installed.
I just sent someone a file.tar.gz that had some patches included (along
with *.orig files). I saw this in the logs:
Oct 25 00:51:26 forrie MailScanner[4303]: ProcessClamAVOutput:
unrecognised line "webuserprefs-0.5/ChangeLog". Please contact the a
Dear all,
I'm currently running clamav + amavisd-new for some time, and having read
through the arguments on notification here:-
http://lists.clamav.net/lurker/thread/20040922.180416.24842818.en.html
I decided to enforce this notification policy in amavisd-new (slight
modification from amavisd-n
26 matches
Mail list logo
