Hi
I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: resolv.h:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 03:10, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote:
Hi
I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the Auto
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:16:53 -0400
Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1
--
Korchmenuk Nickolay
19 Oct 2004 10:23:50
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
when i enter 'clamd -V' i get a version line reflecting the i get a
version line indicating the current database version, eg .../535/...,
currently.
the clamav-milter X-Virus-Scanned lines, however, seem to reflect the
version feedback of clamd when the milter was started, not the current
one
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in exim
log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket (No such file or directory)
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net (mail.blarg.net)
[206.124.128.8]:56990 F=<
Hello together
Iam a new ClamAV user. I have installed it a few days ago on my win2k
windows PC.
I have an scheudled update every hour. but now i always got this warnings
here:
---
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
WARNING: Current functionality level = 2
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm still searching the archives, but if anyone can point me in the
> right direction it would help
Have a look at the thread about Exim entitled "Upgrading to 0.80rc3
breaks Exim malware acl".
T
Graham Dodd wrote:
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in exim
log
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd: unable to
read from socket (No such file or directory)
2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net (mail.blarg.net)
[206.12
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:00:41 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Hübler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask you: What is
> this? Are my hourly updates not enough? How can i solve this problem?
> I have the Clamwin 0.35.2 running. IT IS the latest
Michael Hübler wrote:
I have an scheudled update every hour. but now i always got this warnings
here:
---
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update immediately !
WARNING: Current functionality level = 2, required = 3
---
I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask you
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
> problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
Or even 4.43 with exiscan-acl-28.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
--> So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following
--> error in exim
--> log
-->
--> 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition:
--> clamd: unable to
--> read from socket (No such file or directory)
--> 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 H=floyd.blarg.net (mail.b
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
[ ... ]
> exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
> problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
Or use the newest exim-4.43/exiscan-acl-4.43-28 combination.
Works great with ClamAV 0.80.
--Frank Elsner
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
>> problem. Use exim 4.41 instead.
>
> Or use the newest exim-4.43/exiscan-acl-4.43-28 combination. Works
> great with
Quoting Michael Hübler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I couldnt find something about it on the net. So i ask you: What is this?
> Are my hourly updates not enough? How can i solve this problem?
> I have the Clamwin 0.35.2 running. IT IS the latest release. What is
> "Outdated" then?
As people have alrea
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:23:04 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:03:13 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >> exim 4.24 (the exiscan patch of it, to be exact) seems to have that
> >> prob
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same result.
Any clue??
Best Regards,
Kareem Mahgoub
___
Hi,
First let me apologize if this is way off the mark, but it has aroused
my curiosity. When you say "freshclam fails", do you get a return
value of 1? I only ask because we have two Web Proxies in the office,
one is a Novell box and the other is Squid/Debian. I built the
Squid/Debian box as f
PERFECT!
> --
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:23:37 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED ?
> To: ClamAV users ML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; c
All,
I stuck to use clamd of version 0.80 with daemontools (I used this scheme
very nicely for older version). Does anyone know how to do it?
Thx & Rgds,
Awie
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:24:07 +0300, Korchmenuk Nickolay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:16:53 -0400
> Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p1
Update your ports and install from there.
--
Please keep list traffic on the list
* Kareem Mahgoub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-19 10:32]:
> Hello list,
> I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
> after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
> I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
> qmail-scanner.pl -g ,
On 10/19/2004 10:32 AM +0200, Kareem Mahgoub wrote:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanner.pl -g , with the same r
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error in
> exim log
>
> 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd:
> unable to read from socket (No such file or directory)
It's tryi
Thanks for the quick help.
I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it should
really go to QS mailing list ) my apology.
For hitting reply on a previous thread,
I thought it won't harm anybody, but it seems to be something bad. It will
be my last time.
Best Regards,
Kareem
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
"Kareem Mahgoub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick help.
> I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought, it
> should really go to QS mailing list ) my apology.
> For hitting reply on a previous thread,
> I thought it won't harm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
> "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error
>> in exim log
>>
>> 2004-10-19 09:20:52 1CJoIe-0002Ut-E3 malware acl condition: clamd:
>> unable to read from socke
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:00:03 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
> > "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following error
> >> in exim log
> >>
> >> 20
On 10/19/2004 10:54 AM +0200, Awie wrote:
All,
I stuck to use clamd of version 0.80 with daemontools (I used this scheme
very nicely for older version). Does anyone know how to do it?
Thx & Rgds,
Awie
I use daemontools to run clamd.
I didn't change a thing when upgrading from 0.75.1
to 0.80rc-serie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:00:03 +0200
> "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:42:23 +0200
>>> "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
So I made the leap from 0.75.1 to 0.80 and get the following er
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Until 0.80 this worked
Oh, I remember that issue. But this is due to an improvement in ClamAV
and not a bug!
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200 "Graham Dodd" wrote:
[ ... ]
> av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310
That means your clamd listems for TCP connections on port 3310
> And in check_data have the following:
>
> # Check for Virus/virii exiscan
> deny message = This message contains malware ($ma
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:48 +1000
Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my servers is giving these warnings. What causes this and is it
>
> anything to worry about?
>
>
> freshclam daemon 0.80 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i686)
> ClamAV update process started at Tue Oct 19 14:3
> I use daemontools to run clamd.
> I didn't change a thing when upgrading from 0.75.1
> to 0.80rc-series, and 0.80 final.
>
> My run script and clamd.conf attached.
>
> Regards,
> Niek
> --
Hello Niek,
I used your script and clamd.conf. The readproctitle said error in
Library..bla.. bla...
The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200
> "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Until 0.80 this worked
>
> Oh, I remember that issue. But this is due to an improvement
> in ClamAV and not a bug!
Well some people would say bug . :-)
What happened to backward
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:54:14 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well some people would say bug . :-)
>
> What happened to backward compatibility ?
What do you call a backward incompatibility? The bug in exiscan? ;-)
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:23:21 +0200 "Graham Dodd" wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310
>
> That means your clamd listems for TCP connections on port 3310
>
>> And in check_data have the following:
>>
>> # Check for Virus/virii exiscan
>> de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:54:14 +0200
> "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well some people would say bug . :-)
>>
>> What happened to backward compatibility ?
>
> What do you call a backward incompatibility? The bug in exiscan? ;-)
I wonder what Tom wo
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:01:13 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, and now that I've switched back to 0.75.1 it's running fine.
>
> I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the
> system and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
Sounds like a laziness. Rem
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:06:44 +0200
"Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's see.
>
> Exim 4.24 exiscan-acl patch rev. 12 ClamAV 0.75.1 - works
> Exim 4.24 exiscan-acl patch rev. 12 ClamAV 0.80 - doesn't work
>
> What changed ?
Session handling has been improved in ClamAV and t
Graham Dodd wrote:
I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the system
and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct parameter
during compile?
I compiled one successfully, but I never did use the LDAP lookups for
Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced by
/etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm, because this will
effect my upgrade procedures.
Alex Laslavic
Havertys Tech Services
__
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:12:31 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
>
> It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced
> by/etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm,
Confirmed. But next time pl
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:12:31 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to upgrade to .80 on SuSE Linux PPC distro, from 0.75.
>
> It looks like /etc/clamav.conf in the .75 release, has been replaced by
> /etc/clamd.conf in the 80 release. Can anyone confirm, because this will
> effect my upgrade proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> Graham Dodd wrote:
>
>> I have no way to upgrade Exim from 4.24 to 4.43 as I inherited the
>> system and it has custom patches to work with LDAP.
>>
>>
>>
> Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct
If only I had a standard Exim, or the source a
> Hi
>
> I'v got next errors and warnings whe try configure clamav 0.80:
>
> configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
> configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
> configure: WARNING: resolv.h: see the Autoconf documentation
> configure: WARNING:
Dear Sirs ,
I've seen quite strange behavior of new clamd:
I try to send a message with virus:
If old clamd 0.6 used:
>clamd.log
> Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004 -> +++ Started at Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004
> Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004 -> Log file size limited to 1048576 bytes.
> Tue Oct 19 07:25:47 2004
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:34 am, Meni Shapiro wrote:
> > Two or more scanners from different vendors are recommended in these
> > days...
>
> OK, but the more is NOT the marrierthe more you got the more
> problems you have with interacting with the sendmail.
Either find a better mailer, o
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:46:21 -0500
Jeff Smelser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for
> > guarantees, just striving for perfection
> > All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the
> > mailing list!!) and is it going to be f
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 08:49 am, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Jeff Smelser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I KNOW thatand i still work clamAV...I'm not looking for
> > > guarantees, just striving for perfection
> > > All I ment to say is that I learned of a problem (through the
> > > mailing l
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:32:08 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Graham Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Won't standard exim work with LDAP, assuming you set correct
>
> If only I had a standard Exim, or the source and patches.
>
> > parameter during compile? I compiled one successfully, but
I'
Alex Pleiner wrote:
* Kareem Mahgoub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-10-19 10:32]:
Hello list,
I have upgraded from clamav 075.1 to clamav-80 using the rpm for FC2.
after the upgrade, qmail-scanner ( 1.23 ) is not detecting clamav.
I have recompiles qmail-scanner, ran qmail-scanner.pl -z and
qmail-scanne
On Tuesday 19 Oct 2004 08:32, christian laubscher wrote:
>
> when i enter 'clamd -V' i get a version line reflecting the i get a
> version line indicating the current database version, eg .../535/...,
> currently.
>
> the clamav-milter X-Virus-Scanned lines, however, seem to reflect the
> vers
I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and that
i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got this
message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
flagged as a virus / comment 1.
I upgraded to 0.80rc4 and the jpeg
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:07, Scott Ryan wrote:
> I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and that
> i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got this
> message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
> flagged as a
ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
version: 540
Submission: n/a
Sender: Trog
Updated: Exploit.JPEG.Comment.1
I dont know about anyone else, but this caused me huge issues...
Flagged every jpeg attachment as a virus on 0.80rc3.
Upgraded to 0.80rc4 and problem went away.
> I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and
> that
> i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I got
> this
> message i was inundated with users complaining that any jpeg attachment is
> flagged as a virus / comment 1.
> I upgraded to 0.80rc4 a
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:09:54 +0200
Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
> version: 540
>
> Submission: n/a
> Sender: Trog
> Updated: Exploit.JPEG.Comment.1
>
> I dont know about anyone else, but this caused me huge issues...
> Flagg
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
> You should leave your cave more often :-)
>
> -trog
. . This from someone calling himself trog ? :-)
-Chris
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Wes
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:49, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
>
> > You should leave your cave more often :-)
> . . This from someone calling himself trog ? :-)
>
Ohh, the irony :-)
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses these db
files for preliminary virus detection. The
--leave-temps flag, which wo
I recently switched from Fedora Core 1 to Fedora Core 2. At the same
time I upgraded to clamav 0.80. I have been using 'clamscan /' to scan
my system in cron.daily. I am now running the clamd daemon and have
changed from to 'clamscan /' to 'clamdscan /'.
I am getting "access denied" messages
On 10/19/04 17:26, Pete D wrote:
Hello all.
I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP that uses these db
files for preliminary virus detection.
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 16:34, Trog shaped the electrons to say:
> On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 15:07, Scott Ryan wrote:
> > I saw on my monitoring application just now that clamav was outdated and
> > that i must update immediately. I was running 0.80rc3, and the moment I
> > got this message i was in
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 16:38, Tomasz Kojm shaped the electrons to say:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:09:54 +0200
>
> Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ClamAV databases updated (2004.10.19 12:59 +): daily.cvd
> > version: 540
> >
> > Submission: n/a
> > Sender: Trog
> > Updated: Exploit.J
Thanks for the great tip! The sigtool command works
beautifully. However, it does make me wonder if there
is a bug with the leave-temps flag.
Thanks again.
--- aCaB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/19/04 17:26, Pete D wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Pete D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I just upgraded to the new ClamAV 0.80. I use the
> clamscan command along with the --leave-temps flag to
> generate the main.db and daily.db files. I am using a
> SMTP proxy spam program called ASSP tha
Just upgraded my FreeBSD 4.10 to exim 4.43 exiscan patch 28 and clamav
0.80 using ports.
I mow get the error
malware acl condition: clamd: connection to, 127.0.0.1, port 3310 failed
(Bad file descriptor)
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
Graeme
_
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:17:11 +0100 (BST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Graeme"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> malware acl condition: clamd: connection to, 127.0.0.1, port 3310
> failed(Bad file descriptor)
Can you post the av_scanner entry in your exim.conf file and the socket
entries from clamd.conf.
-
Tomasz,
I posted your response here to the ASSP forum. In the
ASSP documentation, it mentions that ASSP lacks the
ability to block all viruses (I guess that is what
they mean by "basic anti-virus filtering"). I use
ASSP in combination with a amavisd/clamd setup.
Whatever ASSP doesn't catch, the
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 11:38:17 -0400, Peter A Farago wrote:
> I recently switched from Fedora Core 1 to Fedora Core 2. At the same
> time I upgraded to clamav 0.80. I have been using 'clamscan /' to scan
> my system in cron.daily. I am now running the clamd daemon and have
> changed from to 'cl
All,
Tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 from 0.75.1. Failed to compile it.
~~~ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/clamav/0.80 's warnings -
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARN
Robin, Rob wrote:
All,
Tried to upgrade to ClamAV 0.80 from 0.75.1. Failed to compile it.
~~~ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/clamav/0.80 's warnings -
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: resolv.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
Odhiambo Washington said:
> * Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041019 19:18]: wrote:
>> Just upgraded my FreeBSD 4.10 to exim 4.43 exiscan patch 28 and clamav
>> 0.80 using ports.
>>
>> I mow get the error
>>
>> malware acl condition: clamd: connection
> > > http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/6E00G2ABFY.html
> > >
> > > Bit hard to say if this would impact ClamAV?
> >
> > Does clam skip the decompression if the local/global header contain a
> > zero filesize? It sounds like from the article that those of use who
>
> Yes, it does. Unfortun
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:59:02 +0100
"lnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have downloaded ver80 and now I'm not sure how to proceed. I've
> read the manual but I can't info on how to upgrade, is it best to
> remove the previous version or install over it.?
The first option.
--
oo.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Pete D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I posted your response here to the ASSP forum. In the
> ASSP documentation, it mentions that ASSP lacks the
Thank you!
> This is a bit off topic, but I noticed that there is a
> clamav-milter for sendmail. Would using
I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
> "Kareem Mahgoub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick help.
> > I thought it is something in clamav not QS ( on a second thought
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what is more obnoxious. Top posting a short response ...
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:39:44 +0200
> > "Kareem Mahgoub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for
Is there a reason that clamav comes with 777 modes in the tar? I would
hate for someone to change something while I'm compiling, even though my
parent directory is a bit more secure (700). Ideas?
--
Eric Wheeler
Vice President
National Security Concepts, Inc.
PO Box 3567
Tualatin, OR 97062
h
I have downloaded ver80 and now I'm not sure how to proceed. I've read the
manual but I can't info on how to upgrade, is it best to remove the previous
version or install over it.?
Lnx
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide o
Thanks Thomas..
It compiled just fine..
Rob Robin
Network Analyst
Green Apple, Inc.
740-653-9890
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.greenapple.com
Internet access, hosting and development solutions since 1995.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lamy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
several hours.
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
All cvd files seem to be up-to-date but why am I getting this?
Vernon
___
http://lists.clamav.net
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 02:58 pm, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
This was just asked and answered.. Its telling something is suspicious with
the dns update, so it is looking for updates the old way.
Now pay attention next time
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:58:56 -0500
"Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
> several hours.
>
> WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
>
> All cvd files seem to be up-to-date but why am
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:58:56 -0500
"Vernon A. Fort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been getting the following warning with freshclam for the last
several hours.
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
All cvd files seem to be
Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know:
>> WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
>> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
>Please read my today's post in this case.
Could I suggest different verbage:
WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours, falling back to HTTP GET.
Would get rid of the questions of "what d
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 04:29 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wanted us to know:
> >> WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hours.
> >> WARNING: Invalid DNS reply.
> >
> >Please read my today's post in this case.
>
> Could I suggest different verbage:
> WARNING: DNS record is older than 3 hour
I'm using Clam AV 0.80 with Qmail-Scanner 1.23 and receive the following lines in my
clamd.log:
Tue Oct 19 15:22:34 2004 ->
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/newmail01.readyhosting.com109821735148216078/1098217354.16090-1.newmail01.readyhosting.com:
Trojan.Dropper.JS.Zerolin-6 FOUND
Tue Oct 19 15:30:44
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook (or worse, OWA)
you have to open three levels of attachments to read the te
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 05:20:38PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald said:
> Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
>
> Content-Type: message/rfc822
>
> that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
> with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlo
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Am I the only one who sees several of the posters with embedded:
Content-Type: message/rfc822
that includes embedded text/plain attachments. Evolution opens them up
with only one extra step, but if I'm stuck with Outlook (or worse, OWA)
you have to ope
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
> Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
> from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
> broke his own claim, since his had the same issue.
Ah -- could this be people who PGP-sign thei
Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know:
>> Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
>> from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
>> broke his own claim, since his had the same issue.
>Ah -- could this be people who PGP-sign th
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 17:37, Jo Mills wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First let me apologize if this is way off the mark, but it has aroused
> my curiosity. When you say "freshclam fails", do you get a return
> value of 1? I only ask because we have two Web Proxies in the office,
> one is a Novell box and
All,
When will the version of ClamAV 0.75-1 be expired? I hope it will be after I
solve my problem of supervise clamd of new version.
Thx & Rgds,
Awie
- Original Message -
From: "Awie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:57 PM
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0700, Todd Lyons said:
> Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know:
>
> >> Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be
> >> from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages
> >> broke his own claim, sinc
Finally I can supervise new version of clamd. There are some parameter of
clamav.conf that no need anymore in clamd.conf. After editing some lines, it
works well.
However, Qmail-scanner still has unrecognize command that I sure it should
be OK.
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:50:22 EDT:4600: run
/usr/local/b
Hello,
Grant Supp wrote:
I'm using Clam AV 0.80 with Qmail-Scanner 1.23 and receive the following lines in my
clamd.log:
Tue Oct 19 15:22:34 2004 ->
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/newmail01.readyhosting.com109821735148216078/1098217354.16090-1.newmail01.readyhosting.com:
Trojan.Dropper.JS.Zerolin-6 F
99 matches
Mail list logo
