On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0700, Todd Lyons said: > Christopher X. Candreva wanted us to know: > > >> Yes, I'm seeing them, and they're annoying as hell. Most of them seem to be > >> from Trog, thought the other poster that said they were forwarded messages > >> broke his own claim, since his had the same issue. > >Ah -- could this be people who PGP-sign their messages ? > > Yes, inline signing would probably fix that issue.
In my last message, I see:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc"
Content-Disposition: inline
It is an inline, gpg signed message. I had no idea how many broken
MUA's there are out there :) My girlfriend tells me that she has to
jump through hoops to open a signed message in Outlook, but I didn't
think that would be the case with *nix mailers for the most part.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Gran | If your aim in life is nothing, you |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | can't miss. |
| http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpIsbrgZIe0i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
