Re: [Clamav-users] Determining the Current Virus DB Version / Date

2004-06-19 Thread Lee W
Ryan Moore wrote: Lee W wrote: Hi All, I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it, however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB files. The --version switch the freshclam only re

Re: [Clamav-users] Determining the Current Virus DB Version / Date

2004-06-19 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Saturday 19 June 2004 02:38 am, Lee W wrote: > Ryan Moore wrote: > > Lee W wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it, > >> however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find > >> an easy way of determining the current versio

RE: [Clamav-users] Sendmail pukes (more info)

2004-06-19 Thread Nigel Horne
> A list member suggested running clamd as root (temporarily, of course). > Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following error now... > > clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from clamd, got '' > sm-mta[17703]: i5J2IuTg017703: Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try >a

Re: AW: [Clamav-users] uncompressing/scanning Mac archives (i.e. .sit, .sitx, and .hqx)

2004-06-19 Thread Timo Schöler
after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks to all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status 'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually sent/received by Mac users)? Seems that amavisd-new (an "interface between MTA and virus sca

[Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Dan Egli
I've encountered this bug a few times: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls file1 file2 file3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# clamdscan file1 file2 file3 ERROR: Can't access file file1 file2 file3 fi

Re: [Clamav-users] Sendmail pukes

2004-06-19 Thread orv
You might want to update your ports collection and try the latest version of clamav. The latest is .73 Scott Rothgaber wrote: Good Morning! Some time ago I installed clamav from source on a FreeBSD 5.0 machine that was also running Sendmail 8.12.10 and SA 2.63. Sendmail immediately complained

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Steven Stern
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've encountered this bug a few times: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls >file1 file2 file3 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] t

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Dan Egli
Steven Stern wrote: On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've encountered this bug a few times: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls file1 file2 file3 [EMAIL P

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Jeff Smelser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote: > Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that > only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be > faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon d

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dan Egli wrote: Steven Stern wrote: On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've encountered this bug a few times: [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls file1 fil

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Stephen Gran
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:14:35AM -0600, Dan Egli said: > but I cannot scan a DIR either. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD > /root: Can't access the file ERROR > > --- SCAN SUMMARY --- > Infected files: 0 > Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s) > > > Can someone kindly explain w

Re: [Clamav-users] bug in clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Steven Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The same thing happens in 0.73. Reading the man page, it seems that it is a > WAD. > clamdscan [options] [file/directory] > clamdscan scans one file or one directory tree > clamscan works on multiple files. Have a look at the source :) - clamav-0.73/clamsca

[Clamav-users] problem with clamdscan

2004-06-19 Thread Steve Dimoff
Folks,       In my mail.log file, everything runs fine then all of a sudden I have been seeing “Requeuing: Maximum time exceeded. Something cannot handle this message. at /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl line 529.”  I have to shutdown clamd (kill -9 usually, it never dies dow

Re: [Clamav-users] Sendmail pukes (more info)

2004-06-19 Thread Scott Rothgaber
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:22:33 +0100 "Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A list member suggested running clamd as root >(temporarily, of course). > Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following >error now... > > clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from >clamd, got