Rich wrote:
This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and if
there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
2621 qscand15 0 815M 477M 352 S 0.5 47.4 462:01 1 clamd
Tia,
-Rich
Update to 0.
Yep! Solaris is mine too .. GCC is the compiler..
Thanks - I will check options.c
-t
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Alex V. Kovirshin wrote:
; On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:22:02PM +0300, turgut kalfaoglu wrote:
; > I haven;t had any problems with other compilations, but this time the
;
I have the same problem on Solaris, the LOG_AUTHPRIV and LOG_FTP facilities
aren't available on that platform - presumably they're Linux extensions ?
If you remove the lines in options.c which contain LOG_AUTHPRIV and LOG_FTP
then it should compile.
Andy
I found such definitions in 'output.c' n
I just changed the syslog facility flags to their nearest values in
output.c ; replacing LOG_AUTHPRIV with LOG_AUTH and LOG_FTP with
LOG_DAEMON.. It's still compiling but I think it will work.. -t
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleep
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 9:25 am, turgut kalfaoglu wrote:
> Yep! Solaris is mine too .. GCC is the compiler..
> Thanks - I will check options.c
This is being looked in to at the moment.
> -t
-n :=)
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 9:39 am, turgut kalfaoglu wrote:
> I just changed the syslog facility flags to their nearest values in
> output.c ; replacing LOG_AUTHPRIV with LOG_AUTH and LOG_FTP with
> LOG_DAEMON.. It's still compiling but I think it will work.. -t
Please update to the version in CVS
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Kevin Spicer wrote:
> My current thinking is to do it as automatically as possible, otherwise
> I'll just get bored / occupied doing something else and not keep the
> alias mapping up to date
Not to dis your excellent work, but has anyone contacted the corporate
anti-virus com
Yes thanks. I did update to .70, everything's OK so far.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niek
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
Rich wrote:
> This might be slightly off-b
Thanks for the help. The issue was the user which clamd
runs as. I now run qscanq as setuid 'clamav'.
- Steve Philson wrote:
> I believe the temporary files unpacked by qscanq
> (actually by whatever mime unpacker you use) are
> readable only by the owner, which is whatever owner
> is set up
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:05:24PM -0300, KlauX Anderson said:
Hello,
I'm using clamav 0.70, debian woody, kernel 2.4.18 and msg 'ERROR: You
must specify at least one database mirror.' is present.
with clamav 0.65 it was ok. I only made upgrade
What are the contents of
Jim Maul wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
I just upgraded my clamav RPMs from 0.70rc to 0.70 (from
http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/1/clamav/)
Since i am running qmail with qmail-scanner, i run clamav as
user qscand and
have to change /var/run/clamav, /var/log/clamav and /var/lib/clamav
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Frank Richter wrote:
> since my freshclam got daily 308 yesterday I've experiencing an unusual
> high load on my mail servers running clamd:
Ok, ok, it wasn't daily 308 at all ... it was the same time when
it arrived and trouble starts here.
Actually the reason were ill-for
Hi All.
I recently ran clamscan on my machine and th following is a
partial output.(Clamav 0.60)
I run RH9 on a dual boot m/c with Win98 in another partition.
//usr/bin/kmail: Exploit.Junksurf.A FOUND
//usr/lib/mozilla-1.2.1/chrome/comm.jar: Explo
Kelson Vibber said:
> As for what to put on new servers, we haven't decided yet here. I've had
> good experiences with Fedora Core 1 on workstations, but we'll probably
> avoid using it on servers for now. If you're interested, it's at
> http://fedora.redhat.com/ . FC1 really is Red Hat 10 renam
At 05:59 AM 5/12/2004, Marc wrote:
It could be that freshclam.conf is installed in /usr/local/etc (which is
the default for clamav) after installing clamav 0.70 manually.
Also, wherever it is, check the permissions on freshclam.conf and the path
leading to it. It should be readable by the user t
> >This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and if
> >there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
> >showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
> >2621 qscand15 0 815M 477M 352 S 0.5 47.4 462:01 1 clamd
>
> Update to 0.70.
T
I can’t seem to install the ClamAV perl module.
I’m running fedora core 1 and the install Mail::ClamAV
command gives thi error:
Starting "make" Stage
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/.cpan/build/Mail-ClamAV-0.08/_Inline/build/Mail/ClamAV'
/usr/bin/perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/ExtUti
On 2004-05-13, Shoval Tomer wrote:
>I can't seem to install the ClamAV perl module.
>
>I'm running fedora core 1 and the install Mail::ClamAV command gives thi
>error:
[...]
>LD_RUN_PATH="/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib" gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib
>ClamAV.o -o blib/arch/auto/Mail/ClamAV/ClamAV.so -l
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Shoval Tomer wrote:
> I can't seem to install the ClamAV perl module.
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lbz2
>
You need to install bzip2 with shared libs (and probably the devel
stuff)
Seems strange they'd be left out of a modern distro.
-S
>
--
Scott Call Router Geek,
Shoval,
The errors from your Mail::ClamAV installation indicate that you are
missing the package bzip2-devel. You should be able to find the RPM for
it on your local Redhat/Fedora mirror.
You can check if this is the case:
rpm -q bzip2-devel
After bzip2-devel is installed, Mail::ClamAV should bu
I tried softlimit but each clamscan process hangs :-/
- Original Message -
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
> Rich wrote:
>
> >Is it advisable to use softlimits wit
On Wed, 12 May 2004, N S Srikanth wrote:
> I recently ran clamscan on my machine and th following is a
> partial output.(Clamav 0.60)
>
> I run RH9 on a dual boot m/c with Win98 in another partition.
>
> //usr/bin/kmail: Exploit.Junksurf.A FOUND
[sn
Rich wrote:
I tried softlimit but each clamscan process hangs :-/
clamscan should not have anything to do with clamd.
Did you mean clamdscan?
Did you also use clamdwatch?
Did you add the script to kill clamd and start it when clamdwatch says
clamd dead/hung?
Just using softlimit is not e
Hello All,
For those who care,
There are new versions of these patches on my
http://www.jmaimon.com/clamav page
- clamav-devel.jm-pl4
OR
- max-child-wait - clamav-milter 0.70x (with the recent fix)
- streammaxlength - clamav-milter 0.70x
- ALLOC_CHECK - clamav-milter 0.70x
- vsnprintf_alloc
Jason,
I Googled my clamav problem (memory usage grows!) and found this thread.
I've had numerous OOM with my production box so I thought running
Softlimit+Clamd would be a good idea. The problem is I get get segmentation
fault error and all the clamd processes seems to hang.
You mentioned that y
25 matches
Mail list logo
