Mark wrote:
Cleaning is one of the most needed functions I think.
I think the issue here is most people use ClamAV for scanning email, and
then just dropping infected files is fine. If you want to use it on your
local system, cleaning is a lot more important.
I don't know how much you have b
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 23:42:30 +0100
"Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not the problem but I think I send a mail directly to the
> developers(using the adresses I found in the doc).
> I got NO answer and NO answers means for me personaly no YES and no
> NO. It means for me "WE/I don't care..
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:43:09 +0100
"Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not from today to tomorrow or from nov to dec. But maybe in 6 or 8
> months there could be a scan-repair-engine in alphastate.
> I know my words sounds hard but I know also
No, they don't. A virus cleaning engine is rather simp
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:57 -0500 (EST)
Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it has been running for us for several months in a row under
> severe load... I'd call that pretty "stable" in my book. Besides,
> bug-fix or not, the current "stable" release (0.60) couldn't even stay
Oh, 0.6
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:57 -0500 (EST)
> Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, it has been running for us for several months in a row under
> > severe load... I'd call that pretty "stable" in my book. Besides,
> > bug-fix or not, the current
I think he might mean 'clean up a machine which is wormed/rooted.'
The answer, of course, is 'reformat, reinstall from original media, and
restore known good backups.'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antony
Stone
Sent: Monday, November 03, 20
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Tomasz Kojm
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:43:09 +0100
> "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> Now I have used clamav as for e-mail the last month and I think it's
> perfekt.
> Now I will use on my filserver as well. But I do not need Clamav to
> clean virus'.
> My policy is: "Find a file with a virus and it will be deleted!" That's
> it!
> No need for cleaning.
>
> Just my opinion.
I'm
now I'm try to use gcc...
When I use gcc 3.3.2, I get further but end up with the following error:
gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\&qu
00 (EST)
> Subject: Problems compiling ClamAV 20031104
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > Could you please report that errors with your compiler ?
>
> First problem trying to compile the snapshot with Sun's Forte compiler
> (cc) on Solaris 9 is that the follo
r/local/etc no matter what you specified for "./configure
> --prefix="!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ed
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ed Phillips wrote:
>
> > From: Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:43:36
Is there going to be a new snapshot version that will compile on Solaris
with gcc?
I get exactly the same pb with gcc on debian/linux i386.
I've resolve it by replacing the "virnum=0" by a "int virnum=0". It
compiles but I don't know if I produce a bug by adding that.
--
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:43:36 -0500 (EST)
Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First problem trying to compile the snapshot with Sun's Forte compiler
> (cc) on Solaris 9 is that the following files have ^M (carriage
> returns) in them and cc's preprocessor doesn't like them:
>
> ./libclamav/zzi
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:43, Mark wrote:
> I know it's hard but I know also it's possible.
> Not from today to tomorrow or from nov to dec. But maybe in 6 or 8 months
> there could be a scan-repair-engine in alphastate.
So go ahead and write it. I'm sure such a program, if open source and
working p
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 05:05, Mark wrote:
> Sorry but this answer if complete b***s***.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
> So what should my friend do?
> Should he delete the file and all copies?
Obviously yes.
> And then? He has to reinstall the OS couse ClamAV wa snot able to clean it.
ClamAV wasnt des
issue.
You've spotted the problem in server.c and clamd.c aswell. Breaks more
platforms than just Solaris.
The typo in clamscan.1 (--infected) still exists (one liner attached),
would be nice to fix before next stable...
--
Damien
diff -Nru clamav-devel-20031104.vanilla/database/Makefile.am
cla
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Lars Hansson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clean Viruses?
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 05:05, Mark wrote:
>
> > Sorry but this a
17 matches
Mail list logo
