On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:08:57 -0500 (EST) Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it has been running for us for several months in a row under
> severe load... I'd call that pretty "stable" in my book. Besides,
> bug-fix or not, the current "stable" release (0.60) couldn't even stay
Oh, 0.60 is not very stable but the new stable version will be available
on Thursday/Friday (this week) !
> running for a few hours under the same load... which I call
> "ridiculously unstable". The current snapshot is giving us compiler
> grief... yet more gcc-isms... doesn't want to compile with Sun
> Forte...
Could you please report that errors with your compiler ?
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo ..... http://www.clamav.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
(\/)\......... 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
\..........._ Tue Nov 4 13:39:20 CET 2003
//\ /\
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
