Steffen Heil wrote:
> I cannot prevent such things. I have no way to tell my customers: "you
> may not send each other executables or html-files with frames." They
> would go somewhere else immediately.
Just shifted the reply to this thread, Steffen. The iframe exploit, you
are already discrimin
Joe Maimon wrote:
> I may be in the minority here but I strenuously object to the "banned
> extensions" methodology. Especialy when implementing outside of the SMTP
> layer.
> For a service provider its a hassle for their customers. An internal
> corp. may be able to inflict such abuse on its us
