Yes, the regular channel update will work fine to update to 0.100.3
I meant if you wanted to update to the latest 0.102.2 you will have to
roll your own...
> I was going to update via the software update tool!! Would that work???
>
>Jay
___
clamav-u
On 09.02.20 21:28, Jay Hart wrote:
I was going to update via the software update tool!! Would that work???
yes. he advised only if you want to upgrade manually.
Upgrading via distro-proposed solution (yum on centos) is much better.
I recommend doing that instead of manual upgrading due to pos
I was going to update via the software update tool!! Would that work???
Jay
> Jay,
>
> If you are going to upgrade to the newest version manually, I *highly*
> suggest using the EL6 source RPM as a template as it bundles &
> statically builds a newer version of zlib for use with ClamAV as a
> wo
Jay,
If you are going to upgrade to the newest version manually, I *highly*
suggest using the EL6 source RPM as a template as it bundles &
statically builds a newer version of zlib for use with ClamAV as a
workaround to prevent the "malformed database" errors.
https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.
Micah,
I'm still using Centos 6, still on a 32-bit platform. Its patched with the
exception of clamav.
Still running clamav-0.100.0-1.el6. I have the option of going to
0.100.3-1.el6.
I wouldn't say that clamav is working, but I can still send/receive email.
In your opinion, should I upgrade
Am 29.07.2018 um 19:23 schrieb Jay Hart:
> Just got notified that Clamav 0.100.1 is released for Centos 6.10. I'm
> wondering if I upgrade to
> that release, will my malformed database issue get resolved?
what about just update and report?
you need to update anyways for security reasons
___
Sorry, it will not.
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
On Jul 29, 2018, at 1:23 PM, Jay Hart mailto:jh...@kevla.org>>
wrote:
Hey,
Just got notified that Clamav 0.100.1 is released for Centos 6.10. I'm
wondering if I upgrade to
that release, will my malformed database
Hey,
Just got notified that Clamav 0.100.1 is released for Centos 6.10. I'm
wondering if I upgrade to
that release, will my malformed database issue get resolved?
Thanks,
Jay
> My apologies Jay,
>
> I tend to think of dependencies from a development perspective because I
> basically never tes
On 15.07.2018 23:05, Jay Hart wrote:
Hello and good afternoon,
Yessterday on a Centos 6.10 server I ran the software updater application which
indicated 134
packages needed to be updated, one of which was Clamav.
can you remove clamav (yum remove clamav ...)
and reboot, after this reinstall it
Oh, check your permissions on var/lib/clamav, see if clam has access to it
On 7/15/18, 8:05 PM, "clamav-users on behalf of Jay Hart"
wrote:
> Hey Jay,
>
>
> Not sure which it is referring to db wise, but deleting main.cvd, daily,
bytecode and mirror.dat
> should
> Hey Jay,
>
>
> Not sure which it is referring to db wise, but deleting main.cvd, daily,
> bytecode and mirror.dat
> should fix it after another freshclam.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Tom M
>
After I emptied the directory, and reran freshclam, I rebooted the box. Now
clamav is not running
due to
> Hey Jay,
>
>
> Not sure which it is referring to db wise, but deleting main.cvd, daily,
> bytecode and mirror.dat
> should fix it after another freshclam.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> Tom M
Tom,
I removed all files from /var/lib/clamav, reran freshclam (freshclam -v), and
it did not resolve
the iss
Hey Jay,
Not sure which it is referring to db wise, but deleting main.cvd, daily,
bytecode and mirror.dat should fix it after another freshclam.
Thank you,
Tom M
On 7/15/18, 5:05 PM, "clamav-users on behalf of Jay Hart"
wrote:
Hello and good afternoon,
Yessterday on a Cent
13 matches
Mail list logo