Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

Hi there, On Wed, 7 Jul 2021, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > https://marc.info/?l=clamav-users&m=162429486707369&w=2 I have no idea why Ged pointed you at the marc.info archive rather than https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-us

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

Hi there, On Wed, 7 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE notifying something about ClamAV. L

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

> Hi there, > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: >> > >> > > Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE >> > > notifying something about ClamAV. >> > >> > Looks li

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

Hi there, On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: > > > Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE > > notifying something about ClamAV. > > Looks like this is OpenSUSE's respo

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

> Hi there, > > On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: > >> Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE >> notifying something about ClamAV. >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:17:01 +0200 (CEST) >> From: opensuse-secur...@opensuse.

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: openSUSE-SU-2021:2242-1: important: Security update for clamav-database

Hi there, On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Paul Kosinski via clamav-users wrote: Just FYI: this is the first time I remember seeing openSUSE notifying something about ClamAV. Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 15:17:01 +0200 (CEST) From: opensuse-secur...@opensuse.org To: opensuse-security-an

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Freshclam ERROR: Initialization error! WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option

> Attn: G.W. Haywood > > I just received your reply. Thanks. I posted my fix before I received your > quick answer. I am a beginner at Clamav and have just begun to use it in the > terminal. Thanks again for your input. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Friday, July 2nd, 2021 at 2:07 P

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Freshclam ERROR: Initialization error! WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option

Hi there, On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, TH123 via clamav-users wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, G.W. Haywood wrote: > On Friday, July 2nd, 2021 at 1:06 PM, TH123 wrote: > > > > I'm having a problem with freshclam. > > > > $ sudo freshclam > > WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option SafeBrowsing at /etc/clamav/fre

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Freshclam ERROR: Initialization error! WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option

Thanks for any consideration of the problem, but I found the solution. sudo freshclam command is used for updating your antivirus database, which cannot be run while another instance (auto update) is already running. Stop auto uptade process: sudo /etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam stop Run manual up

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Freshclam ERROR: Initialization error! WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option

Hi there, On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, TH123 via clamav-users wrote: I'm having a problem with freshclam. $ sudo freshclam WARNING: Ignoring deprecated option SafeBrowsing at /etc/clamav/freshclam.conf:22 ERROR: /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log is locked by another process ERROR: Problem with internal lo

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: ClamAV HTML RealURL DisplayURL failed

Hi there, It has been a little difficult to make sense of your posts. Be aware that not everyone will be using the same kind of mail client and that on my screen things might not look the same as they do on yours. If your English is not sufficiently good to explain your problem, perhaps before

Re: [clamav-users] FW: How to programmatically determine if I have latest clamd software

You misunderstand what I meant, that was an example of how it works not an example to use in your dashboard. In my case if freshclam fails it sends me an email (another script trigger in the .conf file) and if it sees an outdated clam version it also sends me an email with the info from the log

Re: [clamav-users] FW: How to programmatically determine if I have latest clamd software

> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 19:42:18 -0500 > From: Cliff via clamav-users > > I also have a similar cron script that updates clam daily. > > What I’m looking for is a way to double check in case the script > encounters a problem and cannot notify. > > Unfortunately, your method using fre

Re: [clamav-users] FW:

When I tried to specify a limit beyond 4 GB using the "--max-filesize" or "--max-scansize" options, clamscan didn't allow it. Has that been fixed in the new ".100" release? On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:53:28 + Richard Tappenden wrote: > Hey guys - can you answer a couple of questions? > > Can w

Re: [clamav-users] FW:

El mié, 25-04-2018 a las 10:53 +, Richard Tappenden escribió: > Hey guys - can you answer a couple of questions?  > > Can we configure clamd to scan *any* file type/extension, or does it > only scan certain ones?  > > Can we increase max size beyond 4gb?  > > Is scanning on a mounted drive/n

Re: [clamav-users] FW:

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:53 AM, Richard Tappenden wrote: > Hey guys - can you answer a couple of questions? > > Can we configure clamd to scan *any* file type/extension, or does it only > scan certain ones? There are a very few that are excluded, those where infections have never been repor

Re: [clamav-users] FW:

ClamAV can scan any type of file. That said, it can unpack certain kinds of archives and scan the files inside. Also, ClamAV signatures can be written for specific kinds of files (PE files, text, etc) and they will only be used for those types. I haven’t tried increasing the size beyond that so

Re: [clamav-users] FW: ClamAV - Open Source License

The first sentence on the the "About" page on clamav.net, which is the first response when googling "clamAV license": "ClamAV ® is an open source (GPL) anti-virus engine" From: "Peggy Anstett" To: "clamav-users" Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:57:33 PM Subject: [clamav-users] FW: C

Re: [clamav-users] FW: Problem with setup

On 05/25/2016 11:06 AM, Philip Andersson wrote: I got some new information. The test files came from cybercom and all other test files they sent to us was blocked. I think that clamd removes the virus and reports OK back and translates the stream from PDF 1.4 to PDF 1.5. Because if I open

Re: [clamav-users] FW: Problem with setup

I got some new information. The test files came from cybercom and all other test files they sent to us was blocked. I think that clamd removes the virus and reports OK back and translates the stream from PDF 1.4 to PDF 1.5. Because if I open the two files in hexeditors their headers is not th

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: important message

On 2016-01-28 19:50, Al Varnell wrote: Yet another malware site. Can we get this guy off the list please. + add sanesecurity sigs to maillist server could help even more ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/cla

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: important message

Yet another malware site. Can we get this guy off the list please. -Al- On Jan 28, 2016, at 10:40 AM, li...@kratzt.net wrote: > Hello! > > > > New message, please read > > > > li...@kratzt.net smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: important message

WARNING! VirusTotal check of URL shows that Avira and BitDefender detect it as a Malware Site and download is detected by Kaspersky as HEUR:Trojan.Script.Generic

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: RE: Re: clamdscan t...

On Mon, November 23, 2015 4:18 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > seems that someone with ***idiotic antispam rules** has subscribed to this > list... aka how to let a user down gently... :) Cheers, Steve Web : sanesecurity.com Blog: sanesecurity.blogspot.com _

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Freshclam: Error creating socket

Thanks for letting us know how you fixed it. Surprising how many people don't do that! -- Joel Esler Senior Research Engineer, VRT OpenSource Community Manager Sourcefire On Thursday, March 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Massimo Rossi wrote: > Dott. Massimo Rossi > > Via Meucci 22 – Fraz. Ospedaletto

Re: [clamav-users] FW: Virus/worm detection missed

W dniu 04/13/12 21:00, donald.daw...@bakerbotts.com pisze: > Hi, > > I am new to the mail list. We have used Clamav for many years via > MailScanner. > > Today we have received 172 emails from various addresses and relays with > subject line examples: > > Subject: Your order N13340 for helic

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On 3/29/11 11:39 AM, "Tomasz Kojm" wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:06:09 -0700 Al Varnell wrote: > >> I know clamav (freshclam) needs bzip2 to decompressing signature database >> .cvd files. The scanners undoubtedly use it to decompress .bz2 files they >> encounter. If any of these files are

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:38 PM, TR Shaw wrote: > The problem is that the make for dynamic libraries doesn't work out of the > box so even if you compile the static version clam will link with the old > dynamic lib. Can I "tell" clam where to get the bzip2 stuff? I know I am not using the right t

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:06:09 -0700 Al Varnell wrote: >> If bzip2 is not updated, will clamd be unstable? >> > I know clamav (freshclam) needs bzip2 to decompressing signature database > .cvd files. The scanners undoubtedly use it to decompress .bz2 files they > encounter. If any of these files

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Russ Tyndall wrote: > For older machines (10.4) what is the best way to update bzip2? > > Do I need to put MacPorts on every machine? It looks like MacPorts requires the Developer Tools be installed, which makes that deployment method a lot less practical. -

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

> > I can't think of any reason you couldn't just download and compile the > > source from and install all the files for v1.0.6. i can't speak for MacOS, but that procedure worked for me with solaris 10 and failed for solaris 9. i waited for the vendor patches. rp __

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > On 3/29/11 6:29 AM, "Russ Tyndall" wrote: > >> >> On Mar 27, 2011, at 2:31 AM, Al Varnell wrote: >> >>> Some Mac users will recall that several months back we discussed the bzip2 >>> bug and I filed a bug report with Apple when it wasn't includ

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On 3/29/11 6:29 AM, "Russ Tyndall" wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2011, at 2:31 AM, Al Varnell wrote: > >> Some Mac users will recall that several months back we discussed the bzip2 >> bug and I filed a bug report with Apple when it wasn't included in their >> previous updates back in November. They ac

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On Mar 27, 2011, at 2:31 AM, Al Varnell wrote: > Some Mac users will recall that several months back we discussed the bzip2 > bug and I filed a bug report with Apple when it wasn't included in their > previous updates back in November. They acknowledged they were working on > it and promised it

Re: [clamav-users] FW: APPLE-SA-2011-03-21-1 Mac OS X v10.6.7 and Security Update 2011-001

On 3/27/2011 2:31 AM, Al Varnell wrote: For those of you who chose to update to a third party bzip2 1.0.6 in the interim...I don't know what to tell you. They're likely to be fine. If they installed their build of libbz2 under /usr/local/lib, and setup $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH to find it (or passed

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: [clamav-virusdb] Update (daily: 10917) --about Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c

On 5/4/2010 10:32 PM, eric wrote: I send email attached .xls file which infected X97M.Escape, but clamd didn`t find it. My server : postfix+MailScanner+clamd Eric Please submit missed samples here. http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/sendvirus/ ___ H

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: [clamav-virusdb] Update (daily: 10917) --about Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c

, May 05, 2010 11:17 AM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] FW: [clamav-virusdb] Update (daily: 10917) --about Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c On 5/4/10 8:01 PM, eric wrote: > > Strange, clamav has been update, but still cannt found Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c > , Any idea will be appreciate

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: [clamav-virusdb] Update (daily: 10917) --about Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c

On 5/4/10 8:01 PM, eric wrote: Strange, clamav has been update, but still cannt found Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c , Any idea will be appreciate. It's there. It isn't called Virus.MSExcel.Agent.c: X97M.Escape:0:*:74696d6576616c7565{-14}22737461727475702e786c732179636f7022*6f6e2e73746172747570 dp _

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: Problem downloading 0.95.3 from website

-Original Message- From: Kaplan, Andrew H. Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:08 PM To: 'chupacerv...@gmail.com' Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Problem downloading 0.95.3 from website Hi there -- I have, and that file is zero bytes in size. Following a suggestion that was posted, I a

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: How to Uninstall ClamAV?

Mac Carter wrote: > Recently, I attempted to un-install ClamXav as part of an effort to diagnose > some kernel panics that have been happening on my MacBook Pro (OS 10.5.5). A > search shows there are NO files on my computer with the name ³clam² (partial > or whole). However, I still get regular Co

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: How to Uninstall ClamAV?

ClamXav installs clamav into /usr/local/clamXav/ by default. Also, make sure in your startup items freshclam is not set to run. Simon Hollingshead [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages sent from this email are digitally signed by Thawte. Please do not be worried if you see an attachment named smime.p7s

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: Please help me

: ccordes) - Original Message - From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ClamAV users ML" Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:18 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: Please help me > Mohammed Ejaz wrote: >> - Original Message - >> From:

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: Please help me

Mohammed Ejaz wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Mohammed Ejaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jose Alf." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 6:16 AM > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Please help me > > > >> Jose, >> >> Today morning i have tried to upgrade my clamav as I me

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Mimedefang] [PATCH] Mimedefang and clamd/clamav 0.90

Hello Bill, > I received this from the mimedefang list and I've applied the patch. Now pdfs > can be > sent and received OK. > > This is only a workaround, but it may help others until it gets sorted out. Thanks, I added a reference on http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes090 I also encour

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: malware acl condition: unable to connect to sophie UNIX socket (/var/run/sophie). errno=2

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:07:38 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Cannot get my clamav intergrated with EXIM - whenever I enable clamd > scanning via. EXIM4s ACL I get a "451 Temporary local problem - > please try later" error from EXIM. As soon as I comment out the > followin

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:24:17AM -0500, Jon Roland said: > B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: > >I've seen a message to this list about a GUI to maintain Clamav. > > What I'm calling for is not just a GUI to set up and maintain clamav, > but a more comprehensive setup/maintenance utility for the complete

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

Doubtful. There will always be diversity in computing, and as long as users don't care one way or the other, Windows will always exist and probably will hold the desktop for a LNG time. Which is fine. The user only asks if he/she can do whatever needed on the OS that runs on the deskt

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

Bart Silverstrim wrote: On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Jon Roland wrote: As for Linux and Windows, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it be Linux or its descendant. As for Chevy and Ford, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it be Chevy or its descendant. Operating systems are m

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

On Apr 22, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Jon Roland wrote: As for Linux and Windows, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it be Linux or its descendant. As for Chevy and Ford, eventually "there can be only one". I prefer it be Chevy or its descendant. Doubtful. There will always be diversity in

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: This goes well beyond the perpose of this list. Would be nice if you want to use Linux on the desktop. Perhaps you can create a sort of windows installer look-alike and have it install everything needed. So, if you have some time left.. Not beyond the purpose of this lis

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

At 02:24 22-04-2004 -0500, you wrote: B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: I've seen a message to this list about a GUI to maintain Clamav. What I'm calling for is not just a GUI to set up and maintain clamav, but a more comprehensive setup/maintenance utility for the complete package of MUA (Mozilla by defau

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

Jon Roland wrote: If members of this list are serious about getting Linux to displace Windows, this is critical. IMHO, I don't think this is what we're discussing in this list. -- Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office attachments. See http://www.newsforge.com/software/04/03/27/0134204.shtml

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

B. van Ouwerkerk wrote: I've seen a message to this list about a GUI to maintain Clamav. What I'm calling for is not just a GUI to set up and maintain clamav, but a more comprehensive setup/maintenance utility for the complete package of MUA (Mozilla by default), fetchmail, sendmail, procmail, m

Re: [Clamav-users] Fw: [Bug 105169] Filter for Attachments

At 14:49 21-04-2004 -0500, you wrote: FYI. This is my last submission to the Mozilla Bugzilla that partially addresses the needs of newbies who want a user-friendly gui or wizard to set up and configure everything, requiring the user only to make choices among easily-understood menu options. I'v

Re: [Clamav-users] FW: Freshclam bad viruses.db2 db checksum

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 at 15:48:42 +0100, Spicer, Kevin wrote: > Theres a thread over on the MailScanner mailing list which suggests there may be a problem with the viruses.db2 file on clamav.elektrapro.com. I've included part of the thread below... > [...] It's already corrected. MD5 sum was wron

RE: [clamav-users] FW: ezmlm warning

For the record, I know what's happening, just don't like it !!! -Original Message- From: Stefke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 24 juni 2003 17:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [clamav-users] FW: ezmlm warning Help Stefaan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Fw: Fw: En: Uma Fabula do Cotidiano

Tomasz, I'm sorry. Please, forget the previous message. I don't know how the virus passed throught the anti-virus, but, when I tryed to send you, the anti-virus blocked the message. May by it was in the mail queue before I update the database. Ronan On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:11:32 -0300 Ronan Luci

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Fw: Fw: En: Uma Fabula do Cotidiano

Tomasz, On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:16:46 +0200 (CEST) Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I often receiving this virus, today and my viruses.db > > is updated. > > No, your database isn't up to date. Thank you very much, after I update the viruses database, it started detecti

Re: [clamav-users] Fw: Fw: Fw: En: Uma Fabula do Cotidiano

> Hello, > > I often receiving this virus, today and my viruses.db > is updated. No, your database isn't up to date. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.konarski.edu.pl/~zolw \..._ I nie zapomnij kliknac w

Re: [clamav-users] FW: failure notice

Just an install should do it, qmail-scanner needs it to handle attachments correctly. BR, Daniel Wiberg tech mail wrote: sorry, found reformine in 1.52...but now what? just an install of Maildrop? or do you just do something with reformine? -Original Message- From: tech mail [mailto:[EM

RE: [clamav-users] FW: failure notice

sorry, found reformine in 1.52...but now what? just an install of Maildrop? or do you just do something with reformine? -Original Message- From: tech mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 5:02 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [clamav-users] FW: failure notice