Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-12 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 Jason Haar wrote: > I was just concerned that this thread of conversation was not > about ClamAV and we were beginning to annoy other people :-) This thread is not annoying me. On the contrary, I find it very interesting. :) -- 73, Ged. __

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-11 Thread david
Hello, I'm following this thread. I am also considering HAVP. HTH, David. cas...@gmail.com wrote .. > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jason Haar wrote: > > cas...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Sorry if I was impolite or inconvenient. My english is not good. :-) > >> > >> Actually, I think I ha

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-11 Thread cas...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jason Haar wrote: > cas...@gmail.com wrote: >> Sorry if I was impolite or inconvenient. My english is not good. :-) >> >> Actually, I think I have to read more about HAVP and its >> interaction with Squid. >> > No - I'm sorry. I have re-read my reply and

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-11 Thread Jason Haar
cas...@gmail.com wrote: > Sorry if I was impolite or inconvenient. My english is not good. :-) > > Actually, I think I have to read more about HAVP and its > interaction with Squid. > > Thank you. > No - I'm sorry. I have re-read my reply and it does sound harsher than I meant. I

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-11 Thread cas...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Jason Haar wrote: >> Could you please tell me if you use delay pools? >> >> If afirmative, are they working fine in your setup? >> > That is such a loaded question :-) And it really belongs on the Squid > list. Needless to say, yes we use delay pools, bu

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-11 Thread John Horne
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:50 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > John Horne wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:17 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > > > >> We use the open source HAVP proxy. It supports clamav, sophie, trophie, > >> and several other commercial AV products and works very well. We still > >> use

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Jason Haar
da...@davidwbrown.name wrote: > Hello, I have been following this thread. I would just like to ask: the > bottom line is: you run HAVP behind Squid and no problems from each? I have > been reluctant to run HAVP because I don't want any issues with Squid and I > definitely do not want to quit usi

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread david
Hello, I have been following this thread. I would just like to ask: the bottom line is: you run HAVP behind Squid and no problems from each? I have been reluctant to run HAVP because I don't want any issues with Squid and I definitely do not want to quit using Squid. I want to run Squid and HAVP

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Jason Haar
cas...@gmail.com wrote: > Could you please tell me if you use delay pools? > > If afirmative, are they working fine in your setup? > That is such a loaded question :-) And it really belongs on the Squid list. Needless to say, yes we use delay pools, but they probably don't do what you

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Jason Haar
John Horne wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:17 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > >> We use the open source HAVP proxy. It supports clamav, sophie, trophie, >> and several other commercial AV products and works very well. We still >> use it in conjunction with Squid, as it is a pure "AV proxy" and does

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread John Horne
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:17 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > > We use the open source HAVP proxy. It supports clamav, sophie, trophie, > and several other commercial AV products and works very well. We still > use it in conjunction with Squid, as it is a pure "AV proxy" and doesn't > have all the other "

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:17:14 +1300 Jason Haar wrote: > Steve Holdoway wrote: > > > > running squid and clamd to provide a cleaned feed for html traffic. > > > > You still don't say what that means. You cannot actually run clamav > inside squid - there's no such thing. You must be using some t

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread cas...@gmail.com
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Jason Haar wrote: > We use the open source HAVP proxy. It supports clamav, sophie, trophie, > and several other commercial AV products and works very well. We still > use it in conjunction with Squid, as it is a pure "AV proxy" and doesn't > have all the other "bel

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Jason Haar
Steve Holdoway wrote: > > running squid and clamd to provide a cleaned feed for html traffic. > You still don't say what that means. You cannot actually run clamav inside squid - there's no such thing. You must be using some third-party addon (of which there are several) that does that integrat

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread Robert Schetterer
da...@davidwbrown.name schrieb: > Hello Steve, I found a .PDF @visolve.com that discusses Squid-cache > performance tuning guidelines. I don't have the link :-(. Regards, David. > > Steve Holdoway wrote .. >> As per title, it works, but it's just so slow... I've got a quad core xeon, >> 2GB >> a

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread david
Hello Steve, I found a .PDF @visolve.com that discusses Squid-cache performance tuning guidelines. I don't have the link :-(. Regards, David. Steve Holdoway wrote .. > As per title, it works, but it's just so slow... I've got a quad core xeon, > 2GB > and loads of disk space available. Can anyon

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-10 Thread reiner otto
>I am not aware of any other ways to integrate clamav and squid, but there must be some solutions that allow squid to download the file, have clamav scan it, and then decide whether or not to throw out the file. I can give no other information as I don't scan my http traffic at all.http://wiki.c

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-09 Thread Nathan Brink
Steve Holdoway wrote: > Hi Jason, good to know other locals're on the list. > > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:10:34 +1300 > Jason Haar wrote: > >> Steve Holdoway wrote: >>> As per title, it works, but it's just so slow... I've got a quad core xeon, >>> 2GB and loads of disk space available. Can any

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-09 Thread Steve Holdoway
Hi Jason, good to know other locals're on the list. On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:10:34 +1300 Jason Haar wrote: > Steve Holdoway wrote: > > As per title, it works, but it's just so slow... I've got a quad core xeon, > > 2GB and loads of disk space available. Can anyone point me to any resources > >

Re: [Clamav-users] squid + clamd performance pointers anyone

2009-02-09 Thread Jason Haar
Steve Holdoway wrote: > As per title, it works, but it's just so slow... I've got a quad core xeon, > 2GB and loads of disk space available. Can anyone point me to any resources > to help me get the best out of the server - google's not helping ): > Err - you don't actually say anything. What