On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote:
; Has anyone made it through the market-speak and glad-handing to actually
; figure out what it does? The best I can gather from it is that it's a
; generic content-filtering "protocol" geared towards cache boxes and other
; expensive hardware I don't
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Chris Meadors wrote:
> International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the
> new version of ClamAV be doing? :)
Hopefully it will work well enough that no one will have to modify their
drinking habits.
> Maybe http://www.i-cap.org/home.html?
Has anyone mad
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 18:41, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:51:52 -0500 (EST)
> Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting; do you have any info on "ICAP"? Will the old network
>
> www.icap.org
International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:51:52 -0500 (EST)
> Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting; do you have any info on "ICAP"? Will the old network
>
> www.icap.org
Should be www.i-cap.org .
--sazli
[ http://sazli.surfopen.com |cd /op
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting; do you have any info on "ICAP"? Will the old network
www.icap.org
> interface still work or not? I've noticed on 0.67-1 that the
It will.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:37:13 -0500 (EST)
> Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due
>
> Please defer it for some time - an initial implementation of the ICAP
> pr
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 19:37:13 -0500 (EST)
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due
Please defer it for some time - an initial implementation of the ICAP
protocol should be available in this month.
--
oo
Hi
> I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due to
that, I need to run multiple clamds on seperate machines so as not to eat
all the resources on the main mail server. Think "spamd/spamc"...
On my server clamd is ways faster as spamc, maybe just because it only gets
a
