Hi > I'm looking at implementing clamav for a somewhat large userbase. Due to that, I need to run multiple clamds on seperate machines so as not to eat all the resources on the main mail server. Think "spamd/spamc"...
On my server clamd is ways faster as spamc, maybe just because it only gets a filename, whereas spamc resends the whole file. I am quite source, you will place more load on you server for all that additional network traffic than for scanning all these mails on the local server. If you NEED to share the load, think about loadbalancing of the email-service as a whole. Having exim AND clamd on any server would also make the whole thing fault-tolerant. cu, Steffen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
