Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3

2007-07-15 Thread Thomas Spuhler
m glad I did. > > Regards, > --- > Dave B > > > > > > > Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 07/14/2007 08:04 AM > Please respond to > ClamAV users ML > > > To > ClamAV users ML > cc > > Subject

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3

2007-07-15 Thread Thomas Spuhler
m glad I did. > > Regards, > --- > Dave B > > > > > > > Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 07/14/2007 08:04 AM > Please respond to > ClamAV users ML > > > To > ClamAV users ML > cc > > Subject

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3

2007-07-15 Thread David Boltz
AIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/14/2007 08:04 AM Please respond to ClamAV users ML To ClamAV users ML cc Subject Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3 Hello Luis, > v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds. > v0.90.3 clamscan some_file.txt: 120 sec

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3

2007-07-14 Thread Luca Gibelli
Hello Luis, > v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds. > v0.90.3 clamscan some_file.txt: 120 seconds. [snip] > > Why 0.90.x clamscan load time is slower than 0.88.x? > > Will clamscan load time be improved in future versions? This topic has been beated to death: upgrade to 0.91. Best rega