Hi Luis, I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
Regards, --------------------------- Dave B Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/14/2007 08:04 AM Please respond to ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> To ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> cc Subject Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan 0.88.7 & clamscan 0.90.3 Hello Luis, > v0.88.7 clamscan some_file.txt: 2 seconds. > v0.90.3 clamscan some_file.txt: 120 seconds. [snip] > > Why 0.90.x clamscan load time is slower than 0.88.x? > > Will clamscan load time be improved in future versions? This topic has been beated to death: upgrade to 0.91. Best regards -- Luca Gibelli (luca _at_ clamav.net) - ClamAV, a GPL anti-virus toolkit [Tel] +1 706 7054022 [Fax] +1 706 5345792 [IM] nervous/jabber.linux.it PGP key id 5EFC5582 @ key server || http://www.clamav.net/gpg/luca.gpg _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
