Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] Second ClamAV 1.0.0 release candidate AND updated packages for 0.105.1

I thought there was an issue with v1.0 rc2, as a comparison with a previous installation (0.104.1) on the same machine showed massively increased scan times. After about an hour of digging and laboriously comparing output from clamscan --debug, as well as the man pages and clamd.conf, I finally

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate is here!

On 25/07/2021 06:17, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: Hi Gary, Ged, [SNIP announcement that ClamAV is effectively going non-portable] "So long, and thanks for all the fish". Cheers, GaryB-) ___ clamav-users mailing list c

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.103.0 released!

On 15.09.20 14:24, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > Well, that was entertaining. less of an adventure here (CentOS 7), but my spec file that has been working without modifications since clamav 0.9x needed some patching today, or else clamav-milter refused installation with: Error: Package: clamav-milte

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.103.0 released!

On 14/09/2020 23:36, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: https://blog.clamav.net/2020/09/clamav-01030-released.html ClamAV 0.103.0 released! Please visit the ClamAV Downloads page to get your copy now!

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> Franky Van Liedekerke > I won't go into the discussion of supporting "old" libraries on "old OS's" > again, > but for enterprise users (RHEL 6/7, Centos, Ubuntu LTS, ...) this is a bit of > a problem > Micah Snyder: > Perhaps there is something we can do to make it easier to statically link >

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

I'm always willing to test. However, I don't think freshclam and clamsubmit need newer libcurl versions, so I guess - if changes are need - that only clamonacc needs to be reviewed (for the linking part). With friendly regards, Franky Op Maandag, 07-10-2019 om 16:08 schreef Micah Snyder (micasnyd

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Perhaps there is something we can do to make it easier to statically link libcurl, specifically, with freshclam, clamsubmit, and clamonacc. Regards, Micah On 10/7/19, 9:22 AM, "clamav-users on behalf of Franky Van Liedekerke via clamav-users" wrote: Op Maandag, 07-10-2019 om 14:18 schree

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Op Maandag, 07-10-2019 om 14:18 schreef J.R. via clamav-users: > > This particular hard requirement (libcurl) affects the communication channel > > which is different than causing the code to fail to run at all. So the > > question > > is do the new libcurl requirements immediately break existing

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> This particular hard requirement (libcurl) affects the communication channel > which is different than causing the code to fail to run at all. So the > question > is do the new libcurl requirements immediately break existing systems that are > not yet updated with new libcurl functionality. It i

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Hi there, On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote: ... maybe with an faq page contributed by all of us ... Do safebrowsing.cdiff files *have* to be 20 megabytes? That's more than a quarter of the safebrowsing file size. Seems like something isn't quite right. Increme

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

This is super critical to the future of where ClamAV is headed. So, while I understand it’s a pain in the butt, we need to work out, as a community, maybe with an faq page contributed by all of us, how to get past this hurdle. Sent from my  iPhone > On Oct 5, 2019, at 09:41, Dennis Peterson

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

This particular hard requirement (libcurl) affects the communication channel which is different than causing the code to fail to run at all. So the question is do the new libcurl requirements immediately break existing systems that are not yet updated with new libcurl functionality. It is kind o

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Hi there, On Fri, 4 Oct 2019, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 03.10.19 11:05, Dennis Peterson wrote: Does this obsolete earlier versions of ClamAV? depending on what you exactly mean by obsoleting. older versions will work and will be supported for some time. but freshclam will warn about n

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

On 03.10.19 11:05, Dennis Peterson wrote: Does this obsolete earlier versions of ClamAV? depending on what you exactly mean by obsoleting. older versions will work and will be supported for some time. but freshclam will warn about newer version available. if you have installed clamav via any O

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Does this obsolete earlier versions of ClamAV? dp On 10/2/19 2:20 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users wrote: Ssl interaction with mirrors and ClamAV.net. Sent from my  iPhone On Oct 2, 2019, at 16:42, Rick Cooper wrote:  Not wanting to appear stuipid but exactly what important secur

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 has been released!

Muhammad, Let's continue this conversation offline, as Mussels isn't available to everyone yet. Micah On 10/3/19, 6:31 AM, "clamav-devel on behalf of Muhammad Moosa Aslam" wrote: Dear Team, after running python -m pip install --user in the main directory at the below menti

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> Not wanting to appear stuipid but exactly what important security feature > does the new lincurl include that is so important to moving clamav forward? Shamelessly ripped from Micah's post the other week: Unlike clamdscan, which has the network socket code written by hand, clamonacc depends on

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> > > Rick > > From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf > Of Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 11:00 AM > To: ClamAV users ML > Cc: Joel Esler (jesler); J.R. > Subject: Re: [clamav-users]

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

: Tuesday, October 01, 2019 11:00 AM To: ClamAV users ML Cc: Joel Esler (jesler); J.R. Subject: Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available On Oct 1, 2019, at 10:29 AM, J.R. via clamav-users wrote: ClamAV isn't responsible for maintaining

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

On Oct 1, 2019, at 10:29 AM, J.R. via clamav-users mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>> wrote: ClamAV isn't responsible for maintaining spec files, those are DISTRO-SPECIFIC... Imagine if they were supposed to maintain packages for every distro out there... That would basically bring developm

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> I think you misunderstand me, I'm merely stating a fact here. > Epel won't do anything about libcurl, and redhat won't just backport new > features "because of". Even so, backport requests take a long time at redhat. > Maybe the epel guys will include a static version of libcurl for clamav, I >

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Op Maandag, 30-09-2019 om 15:27 schreef Franky Van Liedekerke via clamav-users: > Op Maandag, 30-09-2019 om 15:14 schreef J.R. via clamav-users: > > > While I applaud the re-use of existing components, requiring this > > > (minimum) version of libcurl will be a problem for redhat/centOS 7 > > > use

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Op Maandag, 30-09-2019 om 15:14 schreef J.R. via clamav-users: > > While I applaud the re-use of existing components, requiring this > > (minimum) version of libcurl will be a problem for redhat/centOS 7 > > users: everybody is still on RHEL7 (RHEL8 is "just" released and still > > lacks support fr

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

> While I applaud the re-use of existing components, requiring this > (minimum) version of libcurl will be a problem for redhat/centOS 7 > users: everybody is still on RHEL7 (RHEL8 is "just" released and still > lacks support from many vendors). > In RHEL/Centos, clamav is only packaged in EPEL, an

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Hi Micah,  While I applaud the re-use of existing components, requiring this (minimum) version of libcurl will be a problem for redhat/centOS 7 users: everybody is still on RHEL7 (RHEL8 is "just" released and still lacks support from many vendors). In RHEL/Centos, clamav is only packaged in EPEL,

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Hi Franky, Unlike clamdscan, which has the network socket code written by hand, clamonacc depends on libcurl for all of its network code to communicate with clamd. The specific feature that we used which bumps the libcurl version requirement to 7.45.0 is "CURLINFO_ACTIVESOCKET". See https:/

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R) blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

Franky, I'm not sure exactly what feature is the requirement from the version of Curl that's required, the blog only says, "...communication between clamonacc and clamd." So you might have to go browsing through the clamav source to see exactly what it's doing with Curl. There is always the slim p

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.102.0 Release Candidate is now available

I'm replying to this because of the blog entry concerning the new version: CURL (VERSION >= 7.45) REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION: This is only relevant if you are installing from source, but it is worth noting. It seems a new curl is needed, even on fully patched rhel7 servers. While this is not un

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.3 security patch release and 0.102.0-beta have been published

Yeah, we have to update that bit. Sent from my  iPad > On Aug 5, 2019, at 23:44, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > > On 06/08/2019 05:32, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>> >>> https://blog.clamav.net/2019/08/clamav-01013-security-patch-release-and.html >>> >>>

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.3 security patch release and 0.102.0-beta have been published

On 06/08/2019 05:32, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: https://blog.clamav.net/2019/08/clamav-01013-security-patch-release-and.html ClamAV 0.101.3 security patch release and 0.102.0-beta have been published We are pleas

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On Monday 07 January 2019, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > > ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released I seen that systemd's unit files exist now for clamd and frashclam but this file isn't exist for clamav-milter. This is a small problem, but it may be should to add a file for uniformity. -- Regards

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On 11/01/2019 04:34, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: [SNIP] > Type casting to disable warnings sometimes only masks potential issues and should only be done with extreme care. This! This!! So many, many, many times this!!! Cheers, GaryB-) _

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

Hi Alan, I'm not sure which source files belong to that third party library. The two non-bogus warnings I got were: libclamunrar/arcread.cpp:32:3: warning: 'ReadSize' may be used uninitialized in this function libclamunrar/rijndael.cpp:101:21: warning: 'uKeyLenInBytes' may be used uninitialized

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

Joel wasn't aware, but we do actually test ClamAV builds on Solaris on a Sparc machine before each release because it's the only big-endian machine we have on hand. Our testing is limited to a manual cursory build and run-test though. We have limited access to the machine (it's in a shared envir

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On 09/01/2019 00:01, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: Solaris is definitely not one of the OSs in our build farm. Just FYI. Oh, I'm not surprised about that, I can't even attempt to justify you having an x64 VM set-up to build clamav, given that the set of Solaris clamav users may be no greater tha

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) wrote: > Hi Alan, > > It sounds like your system defaults to having the -Wall and -Wextra > compiler flags enabled. We do indeed still have a lot of work to > clean up warnings when building with -Wall and -Wextra, I certainly > want to clean up all th

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

Hi Alan, It sounds like your system defaults to having the -Wall and -Wextra compiler flags enabled. We do indeed still have a lot of work to clean up warnings when building with -Wall and -Wextra, I certainly want to clean up all the warnings long term, but the other remaining ones are, to my

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

If anyone is interested, on my system (Fedora 28) building ClamAV generates a ton of warning messages. Some of them are bogus, but a lot are valid. Things like: Variable may be used uninitialized; Variable defined but not used; Variable set but not used; Stat

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

Thanks for bring it up Gary and Scott. I'm sorry to see that slipped us. I put in a ticket to address it for the next patch release. Thank you, Micah Micah Snyder ClamAV Development Talos Cisco Systems, Inc. On Jan 8, 2019, at 1:12 AM, Scott Kitterman mailto:deb...@kitterman.com>> wrote: On

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

Solaris is definitely not one of the OSs in our build farm. Just FYI. > On Jan 8, 2019, at 1:05 AM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > > On 08/01/2019 05:33, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>> >>> https://blog.clamav.net/2019/01/clamav-01011-patch-has-been-released.html >>>

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On Tuesday, January 08, 2019 05:05:37 PM Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > On 08/01/2019 05:33, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > >> https://blog.clamav.net/2019/01/clamav-01011-patch-has-been-released.html > >> >> ml> > >> > >> ClamAV 0

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released

On 08/01/2019 05:33, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: https://blog.clamav.net/2019/01/clamav-01011-patch-has-been-released.html ClamAV 0.101.1 Patch has been released ClamAV 0.101.1 is an urgent patch release to address a

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released!

+1 Thanks, Pierre On 12 Apr 2018 at 13:39, SCOTT PACKARD wrote: Just wanted to wave to Gary, another Solaris 11.3 user. There aren't many of us left. Regards, Scott ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/c

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released!

Just wanted to wave to Gary, another Solaris 11.3 user. There aren't many of us left. Regards, Scott ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensiv

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released!

On 10/04/2018 04:48, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: https://blog.clamav.net/2018/04/clamav-01000-has-been-released.html ClamAV 0.100.0 has been released! Join us as we welcome ClamAV 0.100.0 to the family officially. You can grab it, as always, from the downloads page on ClamAV.net

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.5 beta has been posted!

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Mark Allan wrote: > > On 9 Jul 2014, at 12:15 am, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > > > ClamAV 0.98.5 beta has been posted! > > The ClamAV team is proud to announce the availability of ClamAV 0.98.5 > beta ready for testing! > > > > http://blog.clamav.net/2014/07/clam

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Hi, I've asked the user to recompile with the options below and provide feedback. OS X uses llvm instead of gcc, which means using lldb instead of gdb, so hopefully I've given him the correct command to provide a stack trace! He said it's likely to be the weekend before he gets a chance to do

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Hi, It would help a lot and eliminate much guesswork if someone who has this problem could build a debug version of clamav, as in: ./configure --enable-debug [other flags] CFLAGS='-g -O0' and reproduce the problem with clamd running under gdb (sudo gdb clamd) with the clamd.conf statement: Fore

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

I think there may be some confusion here. There have been three users report crashed clamd with Thunderbird, but I believe the INBOX files concerned were all less than the 25MB limit at the time. In my case, I had never used Thunderbird and installed it simply for test purposes. So as the INB

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

On 2014/05/20 14:27, Mark Allan wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > By "the sample" do you mean the 1.15 GB file? If so, that's the user's > personal email mailbox so I can't imagine he'd be willing to share it. > > If you mean a 0.98.4-rc1 crash log, I've just asked him again, so hopefully > he'll be able

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Hi Shawn, By "the sample" do you mean the 1.15 GB file? If so, that's the user's personal email mailbox so I can't imagine he'd be willing to share it. If you mean a 0.98.4-rc1 crash log, I've just asked him again, so hopefully he'll be able to find it. Mark On 20 May 2014, at 02:14 pm, Sha

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV(R): ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Hey Mark, Is there a way you could get me the sample? Thanks, Shawn On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Mark Allan wrote: > I may have been a bit hasty with this. It appears there's another issue > with clamd. > > I'm receiving reports of clamd crashing when attempting to parse email in > an in

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

I may have been a bit hasty with this. It appears there's another issue with clamd. I'm receiving reports of clamd crashing when attempting to parse email in an incredibly large (1.15 GB) Thunderbird mailbox file. This particular report is from 0.98.3, but the user is reporting it still happe

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV®: ClamAV 0.98.4rc1 is now available!

Sent this the other day to the clamav-devel mailing list but it doesn't look like it came through. Mark On 16 May 2014, at 03:03 pm, Mark Allan wrote: > All works fine for me on OS X 10.6 - 10.9. > > For info, compiled on 10.9.2 with support for 10.6 onwards. > > CFLAGS="-O2 -g -D_FILE_OFFSE

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] Flashback

Is there an RSS we can subscribe to so we can keep up to speed on ClamXav changes? I have to admit, ClamXav is going become quite attractive to many people very soon... Don On Apr 9, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Joel Esler wrote: > Yes. I've written protection for all the current versions of Flashback

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] Flashback

Yes. I've written protection for all the current versions of Flashback that we know of. Cc'ed to the ClamAV-users list. On Apr 8, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Jeremy Neptune wrote: > Does ClamAV detect the Flashback malware? I have an old Mac (running > 10.4.11) and running clamxav. > > Am I protected?

Re: [clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] ClamAV Blog is back!

I'm "finchy" in IRC. So pester me all you want. ;) On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: > This is great news. I was pestering the guys in IRC about it every so > often. :) > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Joel Esler wrote: > > All -- > > > > Just wanted to give you all a quic

Re: [Clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] Webinar Recording

Dixit Jacek Zapala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (le Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:27:15 +0200) : » * Nigel Horne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080908 13:56] wrote: » > Folks, » > » > Edwin's Webinar given last week on the topic of 0.94 is now available » > for download » > from » > https://sourcefire.webex.com/sourcefire

Re: [Clamav-users] [Clamav-devel] Please review W32.Virut.Gen signatures since they are raising a lot of fp

Gianluigi Tiesi wrote: > These signatures are matching a lot of legitimate c# dlls Hello lists, We got badly hit by Murphy's law today. A bunch of signatures, which were meant to extend the existing coverage provided by the W32.Virut.Gen.C set, were published without being properly checked. As so

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-latest

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:00:08PM +0300, Ejaz said: > exit0x3c > /usr/local/lib/libbz2.a(bzlib.o) Just at a guess, it looks like you're compiling against a static copy of lbz2. Can you build a shared copy and try again? -- ---

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20060922 & reload db failed

On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:59:52 +0500 "Roman Serbski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Restarting clamd is solving the problem until the next SelfCheck, so I > had to increase internal sanity check interval. We have another server > powered by FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE under the same load but with > clamav-

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV devel-20050317 - I am so impressed!!

Odhiambo Washington said: > > After creating a little fight over static zlib compilation on this list, You only created opportunities for clarification :-) It was an interesting discussion. And congrats on your successes! dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

Dale Walsh said: > > On Mar 17, 2005, at 00:03, Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Dale Walsh said: >>> >>> On Mar 16, 2005, at 19:33, Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> Dale Walsh said: > >> >> Where are the archives of this list, like for last week? I remember >> someone mentioned how

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

On Mar 17, 2005, at 00:03, Dennis Peterson wrote: Dale Walsh said: On Mar 16, 2005, at 19:33, Dennis Peterson wrote: Dale Walsh said: Where are the archives of this list, like for last week? I remember someone mentioned how to do what I want to do and I think I am almost right in how I was doing

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

Dale Walsh said: > > On Mar 16, 2005, at 19:33, Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Dale Walsh said: >>> >> Where are the archives of this list, like for last week? I remember someone mentioned how to do what I want to do and I think I am almost right in how I was doing it... I don't in

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

On Mar 16, 2005, at 19:33, Dennis Peterson wrote: Dale Walsh said: Where are the archives of this list, like for last week? I remember someone mentioned how to do what I want to do and I think I am almost right in how I was doing it... I don't intent to install zlib-1.2.2 over my system's zlib!

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

Dale Walsh said: > >> >> Where are the archives of this list, like for last week? I remember >> someone mentioned how to do what I want to do and I think I am almost >> right in how I was doing it... I don't intent to install zlib-1.2.2 >> over my system's zlib! >> >> >> >> -Wash > > I guess you d

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

On Mar 16, 2005, at 14:08, Odhiambo Washington wrote: * Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050316 19:40]: wrote: On Mar 16, 2005, at 10:24, Odhiambo Washington wrote: I am trying to statically compile zlib-1.2.2 into my clamav installation on FreeBSD 4.11. cd zlib-1.2.2 && ./configure && make cd ../

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

* Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050316 19:40]: wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2005, at 10:24, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > >I am trying to statically compile zlib-1.2.2 into my clamav > >installation > >on FreeBSD 4.11. > > > >cd zlib-1.2.2 && ./configure && make > > > >cd ../clamav-devel > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel (20050316) and zlib-1.2.2

On Mar 16, 2005, at 10:24, Odhiambo Washington wrote: I am trying to statically compile zlib-1.2.2 into my clamav installation on FreeBSD 4.11. cd zlib-1.2.2 && ./configure && make cd ../clamav-devel ./configure --with-zlib=../zlib-1.2.2 [other opts] This is obviously wrong and wont give you the

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV devel, and email formats (was: Re: 0.75.1 not detecting many more viruses :-( )

Jesse wrote: > 2.) I'm thinking of writing a general purpose Email module for the OCaml > programming language. However, I think the ClamAV project is PROOF > that there are more ways to package email than any one person can > count. ASCII, Unicode, MIME, TNEF, UPX, Base64, etc... the

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV devel, and email formats (was: Re: 0.75.1 not detecting many more viruses :-( )

> So, with that in mind, is there a document, or a group of > documents > out there that I can read (gimme RFCs, non-official > standards, ANYTHING) > that describe the plethora of standards ClamAV uses or > plans to use > in the future? Or maybe just a general list of what's >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-devel vs. clamav-0.75

> > > Trog wrote: > > >On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 04:07, Albert Whale wrote: > > > > > >Whats your point? > > > >I'd be worried if the development version caught *less* viruses. > > > >The development version has more features, hence it catches more > >viruses. > > > >-trog > > > > > > > My point

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-devel vs. clamav-0.75

On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 13:15, Albert Whale wrote: > Trog wrote: > > >On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 04:07, Albert Whale wrote: > > > > > >Whats your point? > > > >I'd be worried if the development version caught *less* viruses. > > > >The development version has more features, hence it catches more > >vir

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-devel vs. clamav-0.75

Trog wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 04:07, Albert Whale wrote: Whats your point? I'd be worried if the development version caught *less* viruses. The development version has more features, hence it catches more viruses. -trog My point is two fold. First, the 0.75 release was made on 072204, s

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-devel vs. clamav-0.75

On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 04:07, Albert Whale wrote: > Just attempted a trial with clamav-0.75 here are the results: > > clamscan --mbox * > Notification: OK > Virus-Sample.070104: OK > VirusSample.072504: OK > VirusSample2.txt: Worm.SomeFool.Gen-1 FOUND > VirusSample3.txt: Worm.SomeFool.P FOUND > Vir

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040215 : automake build error on Fedora Core 1

Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: automake-1.6 --gnu Makefile aclocal.m4:4200: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.6.3, but aclocal.m4 aclocal.m4:4200: was generated for Automake 1.6.1. You should recreate aclocal.m4:4200: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make: *** [Ma

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040215 : automake build error on Fedora Core 1

Tomasz Kojm wrote: automake-1.6 --gnu Makefile aclocal.m4:4200: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.6.3, but aclocal.m4 aclocal.m4:4200: was generated for Automake 1.6.1. You should recreate aclocal.m4:4200: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. make: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1 F

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040217 working in windows here

On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 5:03 AM [EST], Ignasi Prat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi devel comunity: > > Only to say to win testers that clamav-devel-20040217 solved all problems I > had with CYGWIN version of clamav in all the computers I have tested (5 so > far). > > In case anyone knows: ho

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040217 working in windows here

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:03:59 +0100 "Ignasi Prat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi devel comunity: > > Only to say to win testers that clamav-devel-20040217 solved all > problems I had with CYGWIN version of clamav in all the computers I > have tested (5 so far). > > In case anyone knows: how was

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040215 : automake build error on Fedora Core 1

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:24:55 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > automake-1.6 --gnu Makefile > aclocal.m4:4200: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.6.3, but > aclocal.m4 aclocal.m4:4200: was generated for Automake 1.6.1. You > should recreate aclocal.m4:4200: aclocal.m4 with

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040216 for windows

Ignasi Prat wrote: Hi everyone at Clamav: The today's CVS downloaded at http://clamav.or.id/ is does not give an MD5 verification error but gives this error: Seems I replied your previous post too early :) C:\clamav-devel-latest\bin>freshclam -v [snip] STATUS_ILLEGAL_INSTR UCTION 7543 [main

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

http://www.sosdg.org The Abusive Hosts Blocking List http://www.ahbl.org - Original Message - From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:13 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows This

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:51:14 -0500 "Brian Bruns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:35 PM [EST], Fajar A. Nugraha > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Brian Bruns wrote: > > > >> running Cygwin 1.5.7 in *UNIX line ending mode*. > >> > > Which, I think, is why neither of

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

On Saturday, February 14, 2004 6:05 PM [EST], Cedric Foll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The people who are having problems with clamd/clamdscan, can you try >> accessing the file that you were using to test in the following ways: >> >> C:/path/to/file >> C:\\path\\to\\file >> >> and see if it prop

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

The people who are having problems with clamd/clamdscan, can you try accessing the file that you were using to test in the following ways: C:/path/to/file C:\\path\\to\\file and see if it properly scans this time? Same problem. C:\Documents and Settings\cedric>clamdscan c:\\clamav-devel\\test

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

What's your system spec? e.g : - CPU, OS Pentium IV with HT. Windows XP. - Do you have Cygwin, what version No. --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

On Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:51 PM [EST], Brian Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, heres the question - is this just a matter of setting the right env > flags? I could have sworn that cygwin works in unix line ending mode by > default. You also have the issue of either binary or ascii

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

On Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:35 PM [EST], Fajar A. Nugraha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Bruns wrote: > >> running Cygwin 1.5.7 in *UNIX line ending mode*. >> > Which, I think, is why neither of us has problems with freshclam.exe. > > I tried my build on non-cygwin Win2k's, and they have

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

Brian Bruns wrote: running Cygwin 1.5.7 in *UNIX line ending mode*. Which, I think, is why neither of us has problems with freshclam.exe. I tried my build on non-cygwin Win2k's, and they have MD5 verification error too. I still can't figure out why Ignasi Pratt's build has handle_exceptions

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

On Saturday, February 14, 2004 8:14 AM [EST], Fajar A. Nugraha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, it does that. I don't know how to fix it. However, clamscan > handles absoulte path correctly. > If you WANT to use clamd, don't use clamdscan. > > Look at contrib/Windows/ directory on Clamav's SOUR

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

Cedric Foll wrote: I have an other problem with absolute path of files: C:\clamav-devel\test>clamdscan c:\clamav-devel\test\test1 /cygdrive/c/clamav-devel/test/c:\clamav-devel\test\test1: Can't access the file ERROR Yes, it does that. I don't know how to fix it. However, clamscan handles absou

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

Brian Bruns wrote: Ok, I finished it up quickly and uploaded, so enjoy. http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/clamav-devel.exe Major changes in this version are cygwin 1.5.7 DLLs which fixes some version mismatch issues, latest CVS source used to build the binary. Give it a try, if theres problems,

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel 20040213 for windows

Brian Bruns wrote: Ok, I finished it up quickly and uploaded, so enjoy. http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/clamav-devel.exe Major changes in this version are cygwin 1.5.7 DLLs which fixes some version mismatch issues, latest CVS source used to build the binary. Give it a try, if theres problems,

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel build error

On Saturday, February 07, 2004 3:28 AM [GMT-5=EST], Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Bruns wrote: > >> Heya all, >> >> CVS update as of about 40 seconds ago fails when running configure. >> >> >> config.status: error: cannot find input file: clamav-config.h.in >> >> Missing file in t

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel build error

Brian Bruns wrote: Heya all, CVS update as of about 40 seconds ago fails when running configure. config.status: error: cannot find input file: clamav-config.h.in Missing file in the CVS tree? Yes, although you can rebuild that one yourself if you have the "autoconf" and "automake" packages ins

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-devel-20040125 : cltypes.h: No such file or directory {Scanned}

Quoting Jo Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Dear All, > > I just (09:00 hrs GMT, Mon 26th Jan 2004) downloaded the latest > tarball to try out the OLE2 / VBA stream stuff on our file server. > /configure seemed to go OK, I then tried "make" and got: > > > > > In file included from scanners.c:39: >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-devel massive memory leaks

At 01:37 PM 1/21/2004, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Since clamd in 0.65 is much too unstable here (stops responding within minutes), we have been running several development snapshots here. all the snapshots from the last 14 days or so seem to massivily leak memory. typically our mailrelays do ru

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-devel for Windows installer

g The AHBL - http://www.ahbl.org - Original Message - From: "Tomasz Kojm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:57 PM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-devel for Windows installer --

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-devel for Windows installer

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:50:04 -0500 "Brian Bruns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heya all, > > Being somewhat bored this afternoon, I decided to begin work on making > clamav more Windows friendly. I've got a simple GUI in development, > though its not nearly ready yet. I put together a simple, wo

  1   2   >