On Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:51 PM [EST], Brian Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Well, heres the question - is this just a matter of setting the right env
> flags?  I could have sworn that cygwin works in unix line ending mode by
> default.  You also have the issue of either binary or ascii mount points
> (and cygwin IIRC does binary mount points by default too).  I guess I'll go
> documentation diving.
>
> This is what I [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] hate about Windows.  It does 
> literally EVERYTHING
> different from the rest of the world such to a point that even cygwin can't
> compensate all the time for it.
>
> The question is, should we force it into DOS LF mode, or UNIX LF mode?  I'd
> say for compatibility reasons, UNIX LF mode.
>


Ok, did some reading - cygwin is a big stickler for having the right flags
when opening a file.  It seems that the  O_BINARY  patch is gone in the
current version?




The people who are having problems with clamd/clamdscan, can you try accessing
the file that you were using to test in the following ways:

C:/path/to/file
C:\\path\\to\\file

and see if it properly scans this time?



-- 
Brian Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources
http://www.sosdg.org

The Abusive Hosts Blocking List
http://www.ahbl.org



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to