On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:29:20AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >>That's not the question. The question as asked by management is "Why
> >>does ClamAV report it doesn't catch this virus while these others do?"
> >>and my answer is "I don't know - and the ClamAV people don't know,
> >>either".
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible
to answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for
this particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Christoph Cordes wrote:
> > Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > > I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible
> > > to answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for
> > > this particular problem if the article is to be believed.
> > >
> >
> > S
Christoph Cordes wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to
answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this
particular problem if the article is to be believed.
So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an infecte
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I already know the question is difficult, but it isn't impossible to
> answer as there are other AV vendors who have a solution for this
> particular problem if the article is to be believed.
>
So you want to know if the ClamAV Team monitors an infected system to
get hand
Noel Jones wrote:
At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
"It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV moving with
it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still don't know."
Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap box
available to another who may ha
At 10:54 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
"It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV
moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking.
I still don't know."
Apparently you don't know either, so please make the soap
box available to another who may have the answer.
T
Noel Jones wrote:
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
> >
> > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to
clamav is a bit
> > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask abou
On Fri, October 20, 2006 4:50 pm, Noel Jones wrote:
> At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> It is a morphing problem so the question is, is ClamAV
>> moving with it? I don't know and thought it worth asking. I still
>> don't know.
>
> Most likely no one had submitted a sample of that vi
At 05:50 PM 10/20/2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
> >
> > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found'
response next to clamav is a bit
> > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to
ask about it soon - any
>
>
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
> >
> > Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a
> > bit
> > worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon -
> > any
> > words of wisdom I can share regarding
Dennis Peterson wrote:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any
words of wisdom I can share regarding the ClamAV tools?
dp
Not surp
Pretty scary!
FB
2006/10/20, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru/
Is this hyperbole or ??? The 'no virus found' response next to clamav is a bit
worrying. Somebody in management is probably going to ask about it soon - any
words of wisdom I can sha
13 matches
Mail list logo
