Re: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability

2004-04-02 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040402 23:24]: wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > * Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040402 20:12]: wrote: > >> Howdy list, > >> > >> We've been running CVS version devel-20040325 > >> for about a week with great success, but just > >> this mo

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability

2004-04-02 Thread Internet Helpdesk
- Original Message - From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability > > My mailserver doesn't reject any mail with only 5 threads. The high > MaxConnectionQ

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability

2004-04-02 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Just for fun I tried setting the max thread limit to 100, and it's still hanging > up every ten minutes or so like clockwork. This stinks. I'm running into a similar problem with 0.68 clamav-milter hanging up under heavy load. I had max threads at 40

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability

2004-04-02 Thread Brian Bruns
On Fri, April 2, 2004 4:29 pm, Jesse Guardiani said: > > Why would you want to run more than five threads concurrently on a single > processor box? Queue the remaining connections (and make sure your queue > is > large enough) and you'll run more efficiently by avoiding thread context > switching

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: ClamAV CVS version devel-20040325 instability

2004-04-02 Thread Todd Lyons
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 08:30, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > I there any chance this bug has been fixed in the > > latest CVS? > There must be some special email out there that triggers > this behavior. I've had to kill -9 the clamd process 3 > times since my first message about this problem to this >