Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:48:07PM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote: > Where did you get that backport from? www.backports.org I'll wait for the "official" backport to catch up with the bugfix. -- Bruce --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCo

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Thomas Lamy
Bruce Richardson wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:59:42PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: Now, I understand this is due to a problem with the latest version of the database files, not with the Debian clamav backport. But it leaves me stuck, since I have no older version of the files. Is there so

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:59:42PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Now, I understand this is due to a problem with the latest version of > the database files, not with the Debian clamav backport. But it leaves > me stuck, since I have no older version of the files. Is there somwhere > I can down

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 at 14:59:42 +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > I have an interesting situation where my Debian/Sarge workstation is > happily running clamav and freshclam (version 0.60.x) but the > Debian/Woody boxes onto which I have just installed clamav (version > 0.65-1, backported) complain

Re: [Clamav-users] Older database version wanted

2004-02-09 Thread Thomas Lamy
Bruce Richardson wrote: I have an interesting situation where my Debian/Sarge workstation is happily running clamav and freshclam (version 0.60.x) but the Debian/Woody boxes onto which I have just installed clamav (version 0.65-1, backported) complain of an MD5 error and refuse to do anything. Now,