Hi there,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 Henrik Krohns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > >> The messages/hour is not a parameter one typically controls. Systems I
> > >> build are
> > >> build to handle estimated worst case loads.
> > >
> > > Maybe you can't
> Under the radar probably describes it best. Anyway, congrats
> on your good fortune - I should be so lucky. I'm seeing
> 50,000 dictionary attack posts/day typically, and they come
> in from a huge pool. I wish I were paying what they pay for
> bandwidth :)
>
> dp
Oh yeah...
Best,
--
A
After installing 0.92 version, I dont have any memory problem
- Original Message -
From: "Nigel Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ClamAV users ML"
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd memory use
> We anticipate t
We anticipate that 0.92 will use less memory. You can download a release
candidate (0.92rc2)
at www.clamav.net which will give you an insight into how much better it is
than 0.91.2.
-Nigel
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://w
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:53:54PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Henrik Krohns wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
The messages/hour is not a parameter one typically controls. Systems I
build are
build to handle esti
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> The messages/hour is not a parameter one typically controls. Systems I build
>> are
>> build to handle estimated worst case loads.
>
> Maybe you can't "control" it, but if the load is predictable, what's y
Henrik Krohns wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:55:09PM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
there is
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> I'd be real tempted to
>> farm out this function to a capable server via tcp/ip connections.
>
> Okay thanks, is there any guides to farm out such connections to help?
>
I use Sendmail and a milter, J-Chkmail which makes this trivial. It all d
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
>>> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
>>> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should
>>> be shac
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
>> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
>> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should be
>> shackled with 256 meg of memory.
>
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> You are running a very underpowered system for a virus scanner. That
> is the real shame. Memory is cheap even in third world nations -
> there is no reason an on-demand system like a virus scanner should be
> shackled with 256 meg of memory.
So... no chance of running cla
On Dec 10, 2007 11:07 PM, Jeffrey Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Is there any way to reduce/control the memory use of clamd?
Dennis is right. But to answer your question, use "ulimit -m" in your
initscript for clamd .
___
Help us build a c
Jeffrey Rice wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any way to reduce/control the memory use of clamd? I'm running
> a co-hosted VPS, so memory is at a premium. I have 256 Mb of RAM on the
> machine, and clamd is taking 95Mb of virtual, and has a 65Mb resident
> footprint! That seems excessive, to say th
13 matches
Mail list logo
