Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-03-01 Thread shuttlebox
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-03-01 00:08, shuttlebox wrote: >> I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11: > > Please open a bugreport about this, and attach your config.log, and > clamav-config.h. Done. Bug #1439. -- /peter __

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-03-01 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-03-01 00:08, shuttlebox wrote: > I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11: > > source='netcode.c' object='netcode.o' libtool=no \ > DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ > /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. >

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-03-01 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-03-01 04:53, Dennis Peterson wrote: > When I use the OEM console terminal on my Mac it sends \033OP when pressing > F1. > It doesn't do anything in clamdtop. It does work when using Mac's X11 Xterm > app > but I haven't looked up what is sent with it. > > Perhaps the clamdtop author kno

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: > Nathan Brink wrote: >> Gary L Burnore wrote: That is correct, no X. >>> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >>> >>> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >>> >>> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not alread

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: > Gary L Burnore wrote: >>> That is correct, no X. >>> >> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >> >> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >> >> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your >> shell). If

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Nathan Brink wrote: > Gary L Burnore wrote: >>> That is correct, no X. >>> >> Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. >> >> Make sure some sort of display variable is set. >> >> (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your >> shell). If

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Gary L Burnore wrote: >> >> That is correct, no X. >> > > Get yourself a copy of Xming (free) and set it up. You'll have X. > > Make sure some sort of display variable is set. > > (The ssh -X merely enables X connections if it's not already part of your > shell). If xclock or xterm aren't i

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Gary L Burnore
> -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of > Bill Landry > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 6:51 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9 &g

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:50:39 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > > I think no GUI means no X. > > That is correct, no X. > > Bill Sorry, I sort of expected that you'd have an X server running on your local workstation... you don't need one running on the remote machine. Steve -- Steve Holdoway http:

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Nathan Brink wrote: > Steve Holdoway wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 >> Bill Landry wrote: >> >>> I am not running any GUI, > I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from > vt1, not using X at all. >>> I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and >>> F1

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Nathan Brink
Steve Holdoway wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 > Bill Landry wrote: > >> I am not running any GUI, I'm pretty sure this means that he is logging in and running ssh from vt1, not using X at all. >> I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and >> F1 is just ignored. Do I need to

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Steve Holdoway
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:38:04 -0800 Bill Landry wrote: > I am not running any GUI, I ssh into the server and launch clamdtop, and > F1 is just ignored. Do I need to be on the server in GUI mode to see > any F1 results? ssh -X server may help ( no I haven't a clue whether it will, but that way a

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> Bill Landry wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >> should look l

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread shuttlebox
I get this when compiling 0.95rc1 on Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11: source='netcode.c' object='netcode.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/bash ../config/depcomp \ /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../clamd -I../libclamav -I../shared -I.. -I/opt

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 21:18, Bill Landry wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Bill Landry wrote: >>> Török Edwin wrote: > There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it > should look like (screenshot from an earlier

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Bill Landry wrote: >>> Török Edwin wrote: There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 >>> On Fedora

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Bill Landry wrote: >> Török Edwin wrote: >>> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >>> should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): >>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 >> On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Denn

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bill Landry wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it >> should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): >> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 > > On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the "F1 - hel

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
Török Edwin wrote: > > There is something wrong with the background color, this is how it > should look like (screenshot from an earlier version): > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=769 On Fedora 10, mine looks the same as Dennis' - oh, and the "F1 - help" key appears to do noth

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Török Edwin wrote: >> >> >>> Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open >>> to suggestions, if you want some additional features. >>> BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it,

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 20:22, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > > >> Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open >> to suggestions, if you want some additional features. >> BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it >> should automatic

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > > Well you already built it, didn't you? What is your impression? I'm open > to suggestions, if you want some additional features. > BTW you can ./configure --disable-clamdtop if you don't want it, and it > should automatically get disabled if ncurses is not available. I vie

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 18:53, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: >> >>> Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> >>> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect this to be the only surprise.

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: >> Dennis Peterson wrote: >> >>> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect >>> this to be the only surprise. >>> >>> > > I removed the stdint.h include now. > I only tested clamdtop on Sola

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-28 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-02-28 03:20, Nathan Brink wrote: > Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect >> this to be the only surprise. >> >> I removed the stdint.h include now. I only tested clamdtop on Solaris 10/x86, I don't have Solaris

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Nathan Brink
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect > this to be the only surprise. > stdint.h and other includes like stdio.h, unistd.h all define things found in the standard C library. GCC always links your program against the standard C li

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
Gary L Burnore wrote: > You can use inttypes.h instead, but you'd do well to just upgrade to > Solaris 10 as there are MANY good reasons to do so. > > Look up ZFS. > > > Gary L. Burnore > gburn...@databasix.com > There are not enough reasons to do so - it's a very big job to drag a lot of u

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Gary L Burnore
mav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of > Dennis Peterson > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 6:46 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9 > > Dennis Peterson wrote: > > There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I > disabled

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.95 rc1 in Solaris 9

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dennis Peterson wrote: > There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I disabled the > #include > in the clamdtop.c code and it built and linked. Not sure what it might fail > to > do later. > > $ gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 > > It built fine in RedHat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL, 32