On 2005-09-21 11:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> clamd is used by clamav-milter iff --external is used.
>
> If --external is NOT used, clamav-milter does its own scanning via
> libclamav. In which case, the question of virus definition update
> notification becomes important. How/when does
Hi All,
Zip files and exe files with the Worm.Bagz.D payload passing through
the clamav-milter.
I've saved the attachments from the infected messages and tried to
resend them. In this case clamav-milter recognize them.
On the other hand, if I forward or redirect the infected message, it
passes the
Nick Golder wrote:
> On 2005-09-21 09:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Are you using --external?
>
> Currenlty I am using LocalSocket. Using --external didn't make a
> difference.
Did you manually scan with clamscan or clamdscan? Try both ways.
> Is clamd, via LocalSocket, being used by c
On 2005-09-21 09:51 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you using --external?
Currenlty I am using LocalSocket. Using --external didn't make a
difference.
>
> How does clamav-milter know when new virus definitions are available?
> I assume freshclam doesn't notify clamav-milter threads.
Is c
Nick Golder wrote:
> I am consistently seeing zip files with the Worm.Bagle.Gen-* payload
> getting through the clamav-milter (clamav-0.87). The milter is at
> least partially working:
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on
> xxx.xxx.xxx X-Virus-Status: Clean
>
Are
