Rich wrote:
Found this Googling, good tool too to monitor clamd ;-)
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/
Yes, it's good indeed. So is daemontools.
But when it comes to simplicity, clamdwatch is the simplest one.
Which is (I think) why clamdwatch is included on the default clamav
tarball package, r
Found this Googling, good tool too to monitor clamd ;-)
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/
- Original Message -
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
Lucas Albers wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha said:
Did you add the script to kill clamd and start it when clamdwatch says
clamd dead/hung?
What is clamdwatch, I have never heard of it?
Where do you get it?
It's a simple perl script to determine whether
clamd is dead, hung, or alive. http://mike
Fajar A. Nugraha said:
> Did you add the script to kill clamd and start it when clamdwatch says
> clamd dead/hung?
What is clamdwatch, I have never heard of it?
Where do you get it?
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State Univers
Rich wrote:
I tried softlimit but each clamscan process hangs :-/
clamscan should not have anything to do with clamd.
Did you mean clamdscan?
Did you also use clamdwatch?
Did you add the script to kill clamd and start it when clamdwatch says
clamd dead/hung?
Just using softlimit is not e
I tried softlimit but each clamscan process hangs :-/
- Original Message -
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
> Rich wrote:
>
> >
> >This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and if
> >there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
> >showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
> >2621 qscand15 0 815M 477M 352 S 0.5 47.4 462:01 1 clamd
>
> Update to 0.70.
T
Yes thanks. I did update to .70, everything's OK so far.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Niek
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
Rich wrote:
> This might be slig
Rich wrote:
This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and if
there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
2621 qscand15 0 815M 477M 352 S 0.5 47.4 462:01 1 clamd
Tia,
-Rich
Update to 0.
Rich wrote:
Is it advisable to use softlimits with clamd?
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qscand \
/usr/local/bin/softlimit -a 4000 /usr/local/sbin/clamd
An immediate solution would be to use softlimit and clamdwatch.
So,
clamd exceeds memory usage -> ulimit prevents allocationg memory ->
04 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamd Leaking?
>
> > This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and
if
> > there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
> > showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
>
> This might be slightly off-base here, but anyone know if clamd leaks and if
> there's any current patch? I'm running 0.70-rc. Below's the memory usage
> showing clamd eating up the mem resource.
> 2621 qscand15 0 815M 477M 352 S 0.5 47.4 462:01 1 clamd
Same problem here, on diff
Hmmm, test #8 got through. what have i misconfigured? "Test #8: Eicar
virus sent using BinHex encoding within a MIME segment "
Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, John Jolet wrote:
my bad. Turns out it's not clamd leaking. It's kde :)
Got clamd working with postfix via amavisd. works
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, John Jolet wrote:
> my bad. Turns out it's not clamd leaking. It's kde :)
> Got clamd working with postfix via amavisd. works great (i think,
> haven't been sent a virus yet).
>
The EICAR test virus is good for the purpose of testing an AV solution.
Grab it from here: htt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Jolet
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:55 AM
> To: clamav list
> Subject: [Clamav-users] clamd leaking
>
>
> my bad. Turns out it's not clamd leaking. It's kde :)
> Got clamd working with pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clamscan / ClamAV version 0.67
On Thursday 26 February 2004 10:21 am, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> John Jolet wrote:
> > has anyone noticed any problems with clamd leaking memory? I've
> > installed the rpm from crash-hat and it seems to be chewing up my swa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm going to watch it for a few days and see if it grows. might be a leak in
a shared library on fedora. I'm not too concerned about issuing a restart
each night. This is just a family mail server.
On Thursday 26 February 2004 10:16 am, Ralph Ang
John Jolet wrote:
has anyone noticed any problems with clamd leaking memory?
Not me.
I've installed the
rpm from crash-hat and it seems to be chewing up my swap quickly.
If this happens to me, I'd try building the latest CVS snapshot. I
suggest you do the same.
I'm running devel-20040203 o
John Jolet wrote:
has anyone noticed any problems with clamd leaking memory? I've installed the
rpm from crash-hat and it seems to be chewing up my swap quickly. I
uninstalled that and built from source and it does the same thing, just a bit
slower. I'll have to restart clamd nightly if i rea
John Jolet wrote:
> has anyone noticed any problems with clamd leaking memory? I've
> installed the rpm from crash-hat and it seems to be chewing up my swap
> quickly. I uninstalled that and built from source and it does the
> same thing, just a bit slower.
I cannot reproduce that:
vscan 3
20 matches
Mail list logo
