RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-20 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch > (WebCob) > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Jeff Ramsey
On Apr 19, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Riccardo Ghiglianovich wrote: hi, I also have some "NetSky.q.2" not dtected; They are detected by some PC Antiviruses Moreover, Clamav Virus database Search http://clamav-du.securesites.net/cgi-bin/clamgrok does not contains nothing named Netsky* RIc Because Som

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Maul > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 11:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > hi, > > I also have some "NetSky.q.2" not dtected; They are detecte

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 at 12:03:03 -0400, Pad Hosmane wrote: [...] > My XP w/s is loaded > with symantec anti virus and it detected the virus but it did not clean > either, yes it Quarantined. When I see virus history log, I see it as > file called swimmingpool.txt.scr. Looks like it's a new virus whi

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Riccardo > Ghiglianovich > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 19 April 2004 5:10 pm, Riccardo Ghiglianovich wrote: > Moreover, Clamav Virus database Search > http://clamav-du.securesites.net/cgi-bin/clamgrok does not contains > nothing named Netsky* Please can we put a big notice on the ClamAV website telling people that NetSky is SomeFool? We c

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Riccardo Ghiglianovich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 19/apr/04, alle 16:42, Odhiambo Washington ha scritto: * Pad Hosmane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040419 17:30]: wrote: Hi, Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running clamav-0.07-rc. Hmm, 'cleaning' is not an option, unles

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Pad Hosmane
> Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running > clamav-0.07-rc. > > PAd > re-check your db $sigtool --list-sigs |grep SomeFool Hi, Here is the output of sigtool command # /usr/local/clamav70/bin/sigtool --list-sigs |grep SomeFool Worm.SomeFool Worm.SomeFool.B Wo

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Pad Hosmane
* Pad Hosmane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040419 17:30]: wrote: > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running > clamav-0.07-rc. Hmm, 'cleaning' is not an option, unless I am behind the news, but detection should work. But I think this virus is called Worm.Somefool.XX (I'

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Abel Lucano
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Pad Hosmane wrote: > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running > clamav-0.07-rc. > > PAd > re-check your db $sigtool --list-sigs |grep SomeFool Worm.SomeFool Worm.SomeFool.B <- Worm.SomeFool.B.2 <- Worm.SomeFool.D W

RE: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Jim Maul
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pad > Hosmane > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] not removed > > > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I a

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Pad Hosmane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040419 17:30]: wrote: > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running > clamav-0.07-rc. Hmm, 'cleaning' is not an option, unless I am behind the news, but detection should work. But I think this virus is called Worm.Somefool.XX (I'

Re: [Clamav-users] W32.Netsky.B@mm not removed

2004-04-19 Thread Antony Stone
On Monday 19 April 2004 2:34 pm, Pad Hosmane wrote: > Hi, > Clamav is not detecting or cleaning [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am running > clamav-0.07-rc. That's the name I see F-Prot using for what ClamAV identifies as Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2 Are you seeing other varieties which aren't picked up, or is yo