Jenn wrote:
[...]
2) Maybe I'm using the online scanner incorrectly? What I do is save the
message (using my MS Outlook) as an HTML file and then submit that file?
You should extract the raw message (headers and body), otherwise you
miss important parts.
I recommend using a tool like SpamGr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:23 PM
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9
> Good wiki food?
> http://wiki.clamav.net/
Thank you!
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
> "create" your own signature database, by taking the official clamav
> signature database and removing the phishing signatures from it.
>
> We're currently doing this, and I'm willing to share the scripts and
> configs to do it, if there is interest.
Good wiki food?
http
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Pieter Cornet
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:56 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing - ClamAV and version 0.9
>
> No, you can also do that with the current version. You'll just have to
> "c
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 05:20:37PM -0500, Jenn wrote:
> So, to be sure I understand, clamav 0.9
> is what I would need if I wanted to turn off
> the detection of "Phishing" by ignoring the currently
> existing 500 (or so) "Phishing" signatures?
No, you can also do that with the current version.
At 04:20 PM 1/6/2006, Jenn wrote:
So, to be sure I understand, clamav 0.9
is what I would need if I wanted to turn off
the detection of "Phishing" by ignoring the currently
existing 500 (or so) "Phishing" signatures?
Right, 0.9 has this feature, 0.9 isn't released yet. I
think the feature ex
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:53:11 -0500
"Jenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone help me to better understand the details regarding anti-phishing
> support.
The option to control the phishing detection is currently available in
the CVS version only (DetectPhishing yes/no).
--
oo.
> The clamav virus database currently has about 500
> "Phishing" signatures to detect this type of
> mail. Whenever clamav 0.9 is released, it will have the
> ability to ignore admin-specified signatures. I don't
> believe a timeline has been released of when to expect 0.9.
> The archive con
At 03:53 PM 1/6/2006, Jenn wrote:
This is # 13 taken from the FAQ:
Q - Can phishing be considered one kind of spam? ClamAV
should not detect it
as some kind of malware.
A - Starting from release 0.90, ClamAV allows you to
choose whether to
detect phish as some kind of malware or not. This sh
