> I guess it's safe to conclude that new versions (mine is devel-20040204)
> looks for *.cvd in /, not in /database.
> However OLDER versions (in this case devel-20031125, the one used to
> make Win32 binary) seems to looks for *.cvd in /database,
> which would explain the "Verification: MD5 verif
>No ideas about how to solve this, but I get exactly the
same behavior running 0.65, as well as 20040203 devel version. Running on
Win32 as well (Windows 2k server) and CygWin.
>Tim McGarvey
I'm running here at
WinXP.
Ignasi
Prat
> > And after this 'freshclam' says that databases are updated. But if I
erase
> > anyone of the 'cvd' files the files 'freshclam' will download the file
in a
> > temp file at share/clamav. Is there anyway to catch the temp file before
> > freshclam erases the temp ? This way I could run the sigto
Ignasi Prat wrote:
Directly http (at avmirror2.prod.rxgsys.com/database/) downloaded files give
this beautiful result:
You know what, your post (and a recent short "fiasco" on my server) made
me try out most ClamAV mirrors. The result is quite surprising
As I recalled, there was an entry on
No
ideas about how to solve this, but I get exactly the same behavior running 0.65,
as well as 20040203 devel version. Running on Win32 as well (Windows 2k
server) and CygWin.
Tim
McGarvey
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ign
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 at 13:15:24 +0100, Ignasi Prat wrote:
> >
> > Yes, 'sigtool -i main.cvd ; sigtool -i daily.cvd'.
> >
> Directly http (at avmirror2.prod.rxgsys.com/database/) downloaded files give
> this beautiful result:
>
> C:\clamav-devel\bin>sigtool -i
> /cygdrive/c/clamav-devel/share/clama
> > Is MD5 signature packed with CVD files ? could I force a signature test
with
> > a downloaded file to try to separate a download problem of another kind
of
> > problem ?
>
> Yes, 'sigtool -i main.cvd ; sigtool -i daily.cvd'.
>
Directly http (at avmirror2.prod.rxgsys.com/database/) downloaded fi
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 at 11:52:35 +0100, Ignasi Prat wrote:
>
> > Back to your question:
> > try running freshclam with -v option. It'll show more details.
> >
>
> I did this! I had given the verbose mode before and the main change is the
> explicit IP reference of the server used.
>
> freshclam
> Please don't "top-post". Answer _below_ previous messages, not above
> them.
>
> Remove unneeded fragments of previous messages when quoting. Especially
> commercial footers, mailing list footers, big signatures.
>
> Note that I haven't removed them in this message deliberately - to show
> you ho
> I specifically delete all .cvd and adjust my mirros.txt again and it
> still works fine
>
> C:\clamav-devel\bin>freshclam
> ClamAV update process started at Thu Feb 5 16:57:43 2004
> Reading CVD header (main.cvd): OK
> Downloading main.cvd [*]
> main.cvd updated (version: 19, sigs: 19987, f-leve
Ignasi Prat wrote:
I'm running clamav on a Windows XP machine.
Same here
I've granted all rights to the user in all the clamav tree.
The ClamAV was downloaded yesterday, and the compilation seems the same
(isn't it ?):
C:\clamav-devel\bin>freshclam -V
freshclam / ClamAV version devel-2003112
I'm running clamav on a Windows XP machine.
I've granted all rights to the user in all the clamav tree.
The ClamAV was downloaded yesterday, and the compilation seems the same
(isn't it ?):
C:\clamav-devel\bin>freshclam -V
freshclam / ClamAV version devel-20031125
C:\clamav-devel\bin>freshclam
Ignasi Prat wrote:
Hi Clamav users:
I'm running the Clamav Win32 version and it is working pretty well
until I try to automatically update the database with freshclam.
If I update the database by downloading manually the .CVD files to the
"\share\clamav" dir everything is fine.
But when I
13 matches
Mail list logo
