On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 11:17, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> First: Please _dont_ top-post...
Sorry.. Outlook via web *REALLY* sucks... All I had available at the
time though...
> From my personal experience freshclam is _very_ stable, and doesn't
> need to run through daemontools. Also you can always r
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:37, Sancho2k.net Lists wrote:
> The closest I could come is to getting a zombied instance of freshclam
> :( Here's the run script I used:
Same here... I believe it's because freshclam forks itself into the
background to daemonize... Which I don't believe is a bad thing,
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Because I like the way I can control qmail and clamd via daemontools...
And freshclam stopping is, to me, a major issue. If it stops and I'm unaware that it has stopped, then I run the risk of missing a vital virus definition update...
Try reading my posts again and you mig
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Because I like the way I can control qmail and clamd via
daemontools...
And freshclam stopping is, to me, a major issue. If it stops and I'm
unaware that it has stopped, then I run the risk of missing a vital
virus definition update...
If noone else has implemented this, then
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Because I like the way I can control qmail and clamd via
daemontools...
And freshclam stopping is, to me, a major issue. If it stops and I'm
unaware that it has stopped, then I run the risk of missing a vital
virus definition update...
If noone else has implemented this, the
Peter Bonivart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 2/18/2004 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam and Daemontools
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Why use daemontools to keep qmail or clamd running? T
Jason Frisvold wrote:
Why use daemontools to keep qmail or clamd running? There's always that
off chance that something might cause the daemon to die unexpectedly...
An obscure bug perhaps... And if it happens, I want to ensure that the
daemon is brought back up automatically. At least, I *thou
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:52, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> Running it in daemon mode and monitoring that the daemon is still
> running doesn't mean you're connected to the db servers at all time.
> Where did you get that from?
Agreed... I want to monitor the process itself, not keep it connected
to t
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 11:02, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Why do I feel that that would be outrageous? Are you saying that "you
> want freshclam permanently connected to the db servers"? How are you
> looking at it?
No, certainly not... I mean I want daemontools to monitor the freshclam daemon to
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
* Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040218 19:00]: wrote:
Hi all!
Is there a way to set up Daemontools to monitor and run freshclam?
Similar to how clamd is set up with daemontools? I want to ensure that
freshclam never dies for no apparent reason...
Why do I f
* Jason Frisvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040218 19:00]: wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Is there a way to set up Daemontools to monitor and run freshclam?
> Similar to how clamd is set up with daemontools? I want to ensure that
> freshclam never dies for no apparent reason...
Why do I feel that that
11 matches
Mail list logo
