Re: [clamav-users] False positive on go source code using PUA

ok thank you. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > By definition, there is no such thing as a False Positive PUA nor is PUA > considered to be infected. > . > > Based on the description of CVE-2012-1461 >

Re: [clamav-users] False positive on go source code using PUA

On Wed, November 4, 2015 6:03 am, P K wrote: > Hi, > > > I tried clamdscan with PUA enabled on go source code and seen an error. > issue6550.gz: PUA.File.Exploit.CVE_2012_1461 https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/c809983cf1b4f11552a1880272e3002a963a39c453b4883bf47e5c2cfc8f2a47/analysis/1446632226/

Re: [clamav-users] False positive on go source code using PUA

By definition, there is no such thing as a False Positive PUA nor is PUA considered to be infected. . Based on the description of CVE-2012-1461 I’d guess it h

[clamav-users] False positive on go source code using PUA

Hi, I tried clamdscan with PUA enabled on go source code and seen an error. Below are error: clamdscan -v go1.4.2.src.tar.gz /home/punit/go1.4.2.src.tar.gz: PUA.File.Exploit.CVE_2012_1461 FOUND --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Infected files: 1 Time: 0.507 sec (0 m 0 s) Is it really infec