ok thank you. On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Al Varnell <alvarn...@mac.com> wrote:
> By definition, there is no such thing as a False Positive PUA nor is PUA > considered to be infected. > <http://www.clamav.net/documents/potentially-unwanted-applications-pua>. > > Based on the description of CVE-2012-1461 > <https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-1461> I’d > guess it has something to do with the way that file was compressed that > might allow it to be bypass malware detection by a number of A-V scanners, > which simply makes it suspicious. > > I don’t see any errors here. > > -Al- > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 10:03 PM, P K wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I tried clamdscan with PUA enabled on go source code and seen an error. > > > > Below are error: > > > > clamdscan -v go1.4.2.src.tar.gz > > /home/punit/go1.4.2.src.tar.gz: PUA.File.Exploit.CVE_2012_1461 FOUND > > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml > _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
