On Thu, 8 May 2003, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
> Too slow is relative. Well, Solaris is generally slow but I believe speed
> is mostly determined by disk I/O, CPU speed and Memory so if you have high
> end machine it should be fine, no???
Yes, I thought- Apache to Squid in comparison to this same
I have attempted this and spent much time hacking away also hopeing to
do what trend claims to do but alas this is only a claim the big problem
is that the scanner does not pass traffic back to the browser until the
file is scanned this is where the wheels fall off as there is a
potential for a bro
* Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030508 12:24]: wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2003, Fajar Arief Nugraha wrote:
>
> > I use httpd-2.0.44 on Solaris 8+gcc 3.2.2, it compiles and works fine. I
> > haven't tested the security, but so far it has not been hacked yet :)
>
> OK, THX for info.
>
> >
On Thu, 8 May 2003, Fajar Arief Nugraha wrote:
> I use httpd-2.0.44 on Solaris 8+gcc 3.2.2, it compiles and works fine. I
> haven't tested the security, but so far it has not been hacked yet :)
OK, THX for info.
> I wonder if using apache as proxy server is a fast solution though. I
> have used
* Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030508 11:32]: wrote:
> On 8 May 2003, Matt wrote:
>
> > Apache can be used as a proxy server, so if you proxy your connections through it,
> > you will be protecting yourself from virii on OTHER servers :)
>
> OK, this sound nice, say me please - do y
I use httpd-2.0.44 on Solaris 8+gcc 3.2.2, it compiles and works fine.
I haven't tested the security, but so far it has not been hacked yet :)
I wonder if using apache as proxy server is a fast solution though. I
have used it with apache 1.3 iand it is VEEERY SLOW compared to Squid.
Piotr Kas
On 8 May 2003, Matt wrote:
> Apache can be used as a proxy server, so if you proxy your connections through it,
> you will be protecting yourself from virii on OTHER servers :)
OK, this sound nice, say me please - do you have experiences with Apache2
on Sun servers (compilation, working, securit
On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 01:39, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2003, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
>
> > Apache2 + Clamav for virus filtering - http://software.othello.ch/mod_clamav/
>
> If I have Apache with clamav I'm protecting OTHERS against viruses,
> which can be on MY server! Please s
On Wed, 7 May 2003, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote:
> Apache2 + Clamav for virus filtering - http://software.othello.ch/mod_clamav/
If I have Apache with clamav I'm protecting OTHERS against viruses,
which can be on MY server! Please say, Am I good thinking?
I have understood. There is seeking a tool
On 7 May 2003, Robert Gabriel wrote:
> Does anyone know how to possibly setup
> Squid working with Clam AV as the virus
> scanner?
I don't know but this seems to be VERY good question, which
was in our "community" already discussed. So, the marriage
clamav with squid will enable to protect comput
* Robert Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030507 17:49]: wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to possibly setup
> Squid working with Clam AV as the virus
> scanner?
>
> We know it's possible with Trend & other solutions
> but we're hoping to use Clam as it's free.
>
> I searched Google for 'squid clam'
Thomas Lamy wrote:
> [something]
Sorry for leaving return-receipts on in my last post
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Gabriel wrote:
Does anyone know how to possibly setup
Squid working with Clam AV as the virus
scanner?
We know it's possible with Trend & other solutions
but we're hoping to use Clam as it's free.
I searched Google for 'squid clam' but only got
back a bunch of seafood recipes (which sounded
Does anyone know how to possibly setup
Squid working with Clam AV as the virus
scanner?
We know it's possible with Trend & other solutions
but we're hoping to use Clam as it's free.
I searched Google for 'squid clam' but only got
back a bunch of seafood recipes (which sounded very tasty) :-)
An
14 matches
Mail list logo
